David Austin Roses Ltd
General
Total Cases3
Active Cases--
Patents95
--
--
--
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 01/28/25 | MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART GCM Ranch's [27] Motion to Dismiss. Specifically, the Court GRANTS the Motion with respect to Count I of David Austin's Amended Complaint but DENIES the Motion with respect to Counts II, III, and IV of the Amended Complaint. Therefore, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Count I of David Austin's Amended Complaint. David Austin may file an amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days of this Order. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 1/28/2025) (agc) (Entered: 01/28/2025) | |
| 08/19/24 | REPLY filed by GCM Ranch LLC, Mio Ren re: [27] Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Ye, Jingjing) (Entered: 08/19/2024) | |
| 08/06/24 | ELECTRONIC ORDER: vacating 30 Order. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 8/6/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 08/06/2024) | |
| 08/06/24 | ***VACATED PER 31 Electronic Order*** ELECTRONIC ORDER finding as moot [27] Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 8/6/2024) (Judge Jane J Boyle) Modified on 8/6/2024 (kcr). (Entered: 08/06/2024) | |
| 08/05/24 | RESPONSE filed by David Austin Roses Limited re: [27] Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (LaValle, Amy) (Entered: 08/05/2024) | |
| 07/26/24 | ELECTRONIC ORDER: In light of [26] Amended Complaint, Defendants GCM Ranch LLC and Mio Ren's [17] Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is denied as moot. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 7/26/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 07/26/2024) | |
| 07/15/24 | Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by GCM Ranch LLC, Mio Ren with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Ye, Jingjing) (Entered: 07/15/2024) | |
| 07/12/24 | Copy of AO 120 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Patent or Trademark emailed to Patent and Trademark Office on this date. (REK) (Entered: 07/12/2024) | |
| 07/11/24 | CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's Order filed July 11, 2024, judgment of dismissal with prejudice is entered. Defendants, including all their agents, servants, successors, and assigns, are permanently restrained and enjoined directly and indirectly as set forth in the Settlement Agreement, with neither Party deemed as the prevailing party. (DXD) (Entered: 07/11/2024) | |
| 07/11/24 | ORDER granting 26 Motion for Permanent Injunction and Motion to Dismiss. Defendants, including all their agents, servants, successors and assigns, are permanently restrained and enjoined from directly and indirectly as discussed herein. Each Party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs associated with the Action, with the exception of payments set forth in the Settlement Agreement, with neither Party deemed as the prevailing party. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1 ) is dismissed with prejudice. The Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 7/19/24 at 1:30 PM (Doc. 25 ) is vacated. All deadlines are vacated. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 7/10/24. (DXD) (Entered: 07/11/2024) |