Domino S Pizza Inc
General
Total Cases16
Active Cases2
Patents--
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
L1
C
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 11/18/21 | CLERK`S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is in favor of Domino`s Pizza, Inc. against Ameranth, Inc. Dominos is awarded fees and costs in this matter in the total amount of $2,786,185.29 under Section 285, as set forth in the Courts Order on Dominos Request for Fees and Costs 169 . Judgment is entered in favor of Dominos on its counterclaim for patent ineligibility of claims 1, 6-9, 11, and 13-18, only, of the `077 Patent, and on all claims of the 850, 325, and 733 Patents other than claim 14 of the 325 Patent. Domino`s other counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice. Case is closed. (zda) (Entered: 11/18/2021) | |
| 11/18/21 | CLERK`S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is in favor of Domino`s Pizza, Inc. against Ameranth, Inc. Dominos is awarded fees and costs in this matter in the total amount of $2,786,185.29 under Section 285, as set forth in the Courts Order on Dominos Request for Fees and Costs 169 . Judgment is entered in favor of Dominos on its counterclaim for patent ineligibility of claims 1, 6-9, 11, and 13-18, only, of the `077 Patent, and on all claims of the 850, 325, and 733 Patents other than claim 14 of the 325 Patent. Domino`s other counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice. Case is closed. (zda) (Entered: 11/18/2021) | |
| 11/18/21 | Order Granting Ameranths Motion for Issuance of a Final and Appealable Amended Judgment 177 Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b). Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 11/18/2021. (zda) (Entered: 11/18/2021) | |
| 11/18/21 | Order Granting Ameranths Motion for Issuance of a Final and Appealable Amended Judgment 177 Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b). Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 11/18/2021. (zda) (Entered: 11/18/2021) | |
| 11/18/21 | Final Civil Docket 11-18-2021 | |
| 11/18/21 | Final Civil Docket 11-18-2021 | |
| 09/20/21 | Order re: Oral Argument 177 . The Court has reviewed the parties` briefs, and finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). Accordingly, the 9/24/21 hearing is vacated. Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 9/20/21.(jmo) (Entered: 09/20/2021) | |
| 09/20/21 | Order re: Oral Argument 177 . The Court has reviewed the parties` briefs, and finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). Accordingly, the 9/24/21 hearing is vacated. Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 9/20/21.(jmo) (Entered: 09/20/2021) | |
| 09/17/21 | REPLY to Response to Motion re 177 MOTION for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b) filed by Ameranth, Inc.. (Caldarelli, William) (jmo). (Entered: 09/17/2021) | |
| 09/17/21 | REPLY to Response to Motion re 177 MOTION for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b) filed by Ameranth, Inc.. (Caldarelli, William) (jmo). (Entered: 09/17/2021) |