Dongguan Deego Trading Co Ltd

General

Total Cases1
Active Cases1
Patents3
TypeOperating Company
Elite Ratings
--
--
--
--

Ratings

Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
12/23/24
MAILED Patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (jh, ) (Entered: 12/23/2024)
12/19/24
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:The plaintiff's motion for a TRO [7] is denied without prejudice. While the plaintiff's declaration asserts that "[e]ach Defendant stood ready, willing, and able to sell and ship their Infringing Products to the State of Illinois" and that "Plaintiff also purchased the Infringing Products from the Amazon Defendants, and Defendants indeed sold and shipped the products to Illinois," not all defendants used Amazon for a sales platform. To establish personal jurisdiction over all defendants, even those not using Amazon, and to demonstrate some likelihood of success on the merits, the plaintiff must show actual evidence of the defendants' willingness and ability to ship to Illinois, rather than offer a conclusory declaration that such evidence exists. In addition, should the plaintiff choose to re-file its motion, it will also be required to submit a supplemental document (1) analyzing which ornamental components are shared between each accused product and the asserted design patent, and (2) analyzing which of those shared features are not present in the prior art. This requires a product-by-product analysis. In other words, the plaintiff must provide, for each of the accused defendants' allegedly infringing products, an analysis of which components are shared or not shared with specified design patent as well as with the prior art. See ABC Corp. I v. Schedule A, 52 F.4th 934, 942-43 (district courts are "required to conduct the ordinary observer analysis" for design patents "through the lens of the prior art"). However, the plaintiff's motion for alternative service [8] and motion to seal [9] are granted. Mailed notice (air, ) (Entered: 12/19/2024)
12/18/24
MOTION by Plaintiff Dongguan Deego Trading Co., Ltd. to seal documents (Lei, Ge) (Entered: 12/18/2024)
12/18/24
MOTION by Plaintiff Dongguan Deego Trading Co., Ltd. for Alternative Service (Attachments: # [1] Supplement, # [2] Exhibit)(Lei, Ge) (Entered: 12/18/2024)
12/18/24
SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff Dongguan Deego Trading Co., Ltd. for Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order, including a temporary injunction, temporary asset restraint, and limited expedited discovery (Attachments: # [1] Supplement, # [2] Declaration, # [3] Declaration, # [4] Exhibit, # [5] Exhibit, # [6] Exhibit, # [7] Exhibit, # [8] Exhibit)(Lei, Ge) (Entered: 12/18/2024)
12/18/24
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Dongguan Deego Trading Co., Ltd. (Lei, Ge) (Entered: 12/18/2024)
12/17/24
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Dongguan Deego Trading Co., Ltd. Sealed Complaint (Attachments: # [1] Appendix, # [2] Declaration, # [3] Declaration, # [4] Exhibit, # [5] Exhibit, # [6] Exhibit, # [7] Exhibit, # [8] Exhibit)(Lei, Ge) (Entered: 12/17/2024)
12/17/24
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dongguan Deego Trading Co., Ltd. by Ge Lei (Lei, Ge) (Entered: 12/17/2024)
12/17/24
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Lei, Ge) (Entered: 12/17/2024)
12/17/24
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dongguan Deego Trading Co., Ltd. Schedule A regarding complaint [1] (Lei, Ge) (Entered: 12/17/2024)