Durgamritha T Sundaram

General

Total Cases7

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsS.D. New York C.D. California S.D. Florida

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
03/14/23	Sundaram v. Belk Inc 1:22-CV-03258 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE THIS CAUSE came before the Court on a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice filed on March 13, 2023. Being fully advised, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. This matter is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. 2. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. 3. This case is CLOSED, DONE AND ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 3/14/2023) (jca) (Entered: 03/14/2023) ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE THIS CAUSE came before the Court on a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice filed on March 13, 2023. Being fully advised, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. This matter is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. 2. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. 3. This case is CLOSED, DONE AND ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 3/14/2023) (jca) (Entered: 03/14/2023)
03/13/23	Sundaram v. Belk Inc 1:22-CV-03258 ( S.D. NY )	PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Durgamritha T. Sundaram..(Autz, Lindsay) (Entered: 03/13/2023)
03/13/23	Sundaram v. Belk Inc 1:22-CV-03258 ( S.D. NY )	*NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney Lindsay Autz. RE-FILE Document No. 50 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): (1) the Proposed Order was not filed separately; (2) the wrong event type was used to file the voluntary dismissal; (3) the stipulation of voluntary dismissal was not physically signed by all parties who have appeared. Modify the document(PDF) and Re-file the document using the event type Proposed Stipulation and Order found under the event list Proposed Orders or Re-file the Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal separately for the Proposed Order - select the correct filer/filers - select the correct party/parties the voluntary dismissal is against - and attach the correct signed (scanned ink signature image) PDF. (tp) (Entered: 03/13/2023) *NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney Lindsay Autz. RE-FILE Document No. 50 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): (1) the Proposed Order was not filed separately; (2) the wrong event type was used to file the voluntary dismissal; (3) the stipulation of voluntary dismissal was not physically signed by all parties who have appeared. Modify the document(PDF) and Re-file the document using the event type Proposed Stipulation and Order found under the event list Proposed Orders or Re-file the Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal separately for the Proposed Order - select the correct filer/filers - select the correct party/parties the voluntary dismissal is against - and attach the correct signed (scanned ink signature image) PDF. (tp) (Entered: 03/13/2023)
03/10/23	Sundaram v. Belk Inc 1:22-CV-03258 ( S.D. NY )	FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Belk Ecommerce LLC, Belk, Inc., Durgamritha T. Sundaram and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Durgamritha T. Sundaram. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Autz, Lindsay) Modified on 3/13/2023 (tp). (Entered: 03/10/2023) FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Belk Ecommerce LLC, Belk, Inc., Durgamritha T. Sundaram and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Durgamritha T. Sundaram. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Autz, Lindsay) Modified on 3/13/2023 (tp). (Entered: 03/10/2023)
11/28/22	Sundaram v. Belk Inc 1:22-CV-03258 ( S.D. NY )	ANSWER to 42 Counterclaim. Document filed by Durgamritha T. Sundaram..(Autz, Lindsay) (Entered: 11/28/2022)
11/16/22	Sundaram v. Belk Inc 1:22-CV-03258 ( S.D. NY )	NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jacob Steven Wharton, I on behalf of Belk Ecommerce LLC, Belk, Inc...(Wharton, Jacob) (Entered: 11/16/2022)
11/15/22	Sundaram v. Belk Inc 1:22-CV-03258 ( S.D. NY )	CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER: All parties do not consent to conducting all further proceedings before a magistrate judge, including motions and trial. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). This is to be tired to a jury. Counsel for the parties have conferred and their present best estimate of the length of trial is: 4 days. Deposition due by 3/7/2023. Fact Discovery due by 3/7/2023. Expert Discovery due by 5/5/2023. Case Management Conference set for 3/29/2023 at 02:00 PM before Judge Analisa Torres. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 11/15/2022) (kv) (Entered: 11/15/2022) CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER: All parties do not consent to conducting all further proceedings before a magistrate judge, including motions and trial. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). This is to be tired to a jury. Counsel for the parties have conferred and their present best estimate of the length of trial is: 4 days. Deposition due by 3/7/2023. Fact Discovery due by 3/7/2023. Expert Discovery due by 5/5/2023. Case Management Conference set for 3/29/2023 at 02:00 PM before Judge Analisa Torres. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 11/15/2022) (kv) (Entered: 11/15/2022)
11/15/22	Sundaram v. Belk Inc 1:22-CV-03258 ( S.D. NY )	CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER: All parties do not consent to conducting all further proceedings before a magistrate judge, including motions and trial. 28 U.S.C. Â§ 636(c). This is to be tired to a jury. Counsel for the parties have conferred and their present best estimate of the length of trial is: 4 days. Deposition due by 3/7/2023. Fact Discovery due by 3/7/2023. Expert Discovery due by 5/5/2023. Case Management Conference set for 3/29/2023 at 02:00 PM before Judge Analisa Torres. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 11/15/2022) (kv) (Entered: 11/15/2022) CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER: All parties do not consent to conducting all further proceedings before a magistrate judge, including motions and trial. 28 U.S.C. Â§ 636(c). This is to be tired to a jury. Counsel for the parties have conferred and their present best estimate of the length of trial is: 4 days. Deposition due by 3/7/2023. Fact Discovery due by 3/7/2023. Expert Discovery due by 5/5/2023. Case Management Conference set for 3/29/2023 at 02:00 PM before Judge Analisa Torres. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 11/15/2022) (kv) (Entered: 11/15/2022)
11/15/22	Sundaram v. Belk Inc 1:22-CV-03258 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER granting 44 Motion for Jacob S. Wharton to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Analisa Torres)(Text Only Order) (CP) (Entered: 11/15/2022)
11/10/22	Sundaram v. Belk Inc 1:22-CV-03258 ( S.D. NY )	>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. 44 MOTION for Jacob S. Wharton to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26939736. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sgz) (Entered: 11/10/2022)