Dynaenergetics GmbH Co

General

Total Cases2

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsS.D. Texas

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

PTAB

dynaenergetics.com

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

L2

B

PTAB

L5

A

CAFC

L2

D

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
04/18/23	Dynaenergetics Europe GmbH v. Huntin 4:17-CV-03784 ( S.D. TX )	Mail Returned Undeliverable as to attorney Brian Craft as to DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH re: 108 Order, filed. Order was re-noticed. (RebeccaBecknal, 4) (Entered: 04/18/2023)
03/28/23	Dynaenergetics Europe GmbH v. Huntin 4:17-CV-03784 ( S.D. TX )	Mail Returned Undeliverable as to attorney Brian Craft as to DynaEnergetics US, Inc. re: 108 Order. Address updated and document renoticed., filed. (JacquelineMata, 4) (Entered: 03/28/2023)
03/06/23	Dynaenergetics Europe GmbH v. Huntin 4:17-CV-03784 ( S.D. TX )	ORDER - The Parties filed a 109 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice stipulating to the dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The parties have further stipulated to the dismissal of Defendants' counterclaims without prejudice Accordingly, this Court accepts the stipulation and this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendant's counterclaims and DISMISSED with prejudice against all remaining claims.Each party will bear its own costs...* Case terminated on 3/6/23.. * STAYED flag cleared. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) (Main Document 110 replaced on 3/6/2023) (sanderson, 4). (Entered: 03/06/2023) ORDER - The Parties filed a 109 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice stipulating to the dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The parties have further stipulated to the dismissal of Defendants' counterclaims without prejudice Accordingly, this Court accepts the stipulation and this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendant's counterclaims and DISMISSED with prejudice against all remaining claims.Each party will bear its own costs...* Case terminated on 3/6/23.. * STAYED flag cleared. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) (Main Document 110 replaced on 3/6/2023) (sanderson, 4). (Entered: 03/06/2023)
03/03/23	Dynaenergetics Europe GmbH v. Huntin 4:17-CV-03784 ( S.D. TX )	STIPULATION of Dismissal by DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH, DynaEnergetics US, Inc., filed.(Moore, Megan) (Entered: 03/03/2023)
02/23/23	Dynaenergetics Europe GmbH v. Huntin 4:17-CV-03784 ( S.D. TX )	ORDER - the Parties shall file a Joint Status Report by March 3, 2023, regardingthe status of this matter. ( Status Report due by 3/3/2023 )(Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) (Entered: 02/23/2023)
01/27/23	Dynaenergetics Europe GmbH v. Huntin 4:17-CV-03784 ( S.D. TX )	STATUS REPORT by DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH, DynaEnergetics US, Inc., filed.(Moore, Megan) (Entered: 01/27/2023)
10/26/22	Dynaenergetics Europe GmbH v. Huntin 4:17-CV-03784 ( S.D. TX )	STATUS REPORT by DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH, DynaEnergetics US, Inc., filed. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Moore, Megan) (Entered: 10/26/2022)
07/16/21	Dynaenergetics Europe GmbH v. Huntin 4:17-CV-03784 ( S.D. TX )	MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the reasons stated in § II, Plaintiff's 57 Opposed Motion for Reconsideration of Order Consolidating 4:20-2123 and 4:17-3784 is GRANTED, and that portion of Order, Docket Entry No. 55, that consolidated Civil Action No. H-20-2123 with Civil Action No. H-17-3784 is VACATED. Civil Action No. 20-2123 and Civil Action No. H-17-3784 will now proceed under their individual case numbers. This court will retain jurisdiction over both cases. For the reasons stated in § III, Plaintiffs' 67 SEALED MOTION for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. Plaintiffs' counsel will submit by July 22, 2021, a proposed patent case scheduling order with dates that are based on the date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. The proposed scheduling order should include a date requiring mediation within thirty (30) days of the court's Markman ruling. For the reasons stated in § IV, Defendant's 81 SEALED EMERGENCY MOTION FOR CONTEMPT AND TO ENFORCE STAY is DENIED. ( Notice of Compliance due by 7/22/2021 - Proposed Scheduling Order due) * 97 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-reply is moot pursuant to the ruling on Deft's 81 Sealed Emergency Motion for Contempt and to Enforce Stay (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) (Entered: 07/16/2021) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the reasons stated in § II, Plaintiff's 57 Opposed Motion for Reconsideration of Order Consolidating 4:20-2123 and 4:17-3784 is GRANTED, and that portion of Order, Docket Entry No. 55, that consolidated Civil Action No. H-20-2123 with Civil Action No. H-17-3784 is VACATED. Civil Action No. 20-2123 and Civil Action No. H-17-3784 will now proceed under their individual case numbers. This court will retain jurisdiction over both cases. For the reasons stated in § III, Plaintiffs' 67 SEALED MOTION for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. Plaintiffs' counsel will submit by July 22, 2021, a proposed patent case scheduling order with dates that are based on the date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. The proposed scheduling order should include a date requiring mediation within thirty (30) days of the court's Markman ruling. For the reasons stated in § IV, Defendant's 81 SEALED EMERGENCY MOTION FOR CONTEMPT AND TO ENFORCE STAY is DENIED. ( Notice of Compliance due by 7/22/2021 - Proposed Scheduling Order due) 97 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-reply is moot pursuant to the ruling on Deft's 81 Sealed Emergency Motion for Contempt and to Enforce Stay *(Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) (Entered: 07/16/2021)
07/16/21	Dynaenergetics Europe GmbH v. Huntin 4:17-CV-03784 ( S.D. TX )	*** Copy of Order (Doc #105) entered in 4:20-cv-2123 under Doc #50, filed. (sanderson, 4) (Entered: 07/16/2021)
07/16/21	Dynaenergetics Europe GmbH v. Huntin 4:17-CV-03784 ( S.D. TX )	MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the reasons stated in Â§ II, Plaintiff's 57 Opposed Motion for Reconsideration of Order Consolidating 4:20-2123 and 4:17-3784 is GRANTED, and that portion of Order, Docket Entry No. 55, that consolidated Civil Action No. H-20-2123 with Civil Action No. H-17-3784 is VACATED. Civil Action No. 20-2123 and Civil Action No. H-17-3784 will now proceed under their individual case numbers. This court will retain jurisdiction over both cases. For the reasons stated in Â§ III, Plaintiffs' 67 SEALED MOTION for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. Plaintiffs' counsel will submit by July 22, 2021, a proposed patent case scheduling order with dates that are based on the date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. The proposed scheduling order should include a date requiring mediation within thirty (30) days of the court's Markman ruling. For the reasons stated in Â§ IV, Defendant's 81 SEALED EMERGENCY MOTION FOR CONTEMPT AND TO ENFORCE STAY is DENIED. ( Notice of Compliance due by 7/22/2021 - Proposed Scheduling Order due) * 97 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-reply is moot pursuant to the ruling on Deft's 81 Sealed Emergency Motion for Contempt and to Enforce Stay (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) (Entered: 07/16/2021) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the reasons stated in Â§ II, Plaintiff's 57 Opposed Motion for Reconsideration of Order Consolidating 4:20-2123 and 4:17-3784 is GRANTED, and that portion of Order, Docket Entry No. 55, that consolidated Civil Action No. H-20-2123 with Civil Action No. H-17-3784 is VACATED. Civil Action No. 20-2123 and Civil Action No. H-17-3784 will now proceed under their individual case numbers. This court will retain jurisdiction over both cases. For the reasons stated in Â§ III, Plaintiffs' 67 SEALED MOTION for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. Plaintiffs' counsel will submit by July 22, 2021, a proposed patent case scheduling order with dates that are based on the date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. The proposed scheduling order should include a date requiring mediation within thirty (30) days of the court's Markman ruling. For the reasons stated in Â§ IV, Defendant's 81 SEALED EMERGENCY MOTION FOR CONTEMPT AND TO ENFORCE STAY is DENIED. ( Notice of Compliance due by 7/22/2021 - Proposed Scheduling Order due) 97 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-reply is moot pursuant to the ruling on Deft's 81 Sealed Emergency Motion for Contempt and to Enforce Stay *(Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) (Entered: 07/16/2021)