Eagleview Technologies Inc

General

Total Cases37

Active Cases12

Patents63

CourtsW.D. Washington D. New Jersey D. Utah

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

eagleview-technologies

eagleview-technologies

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

L3

E

PTAB

L5

A

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
09/10/24	Eagle View Technologies v. Nearmap 2:21-CV-00283 ( D. UT )	MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO SEAL RELATED TO EAGLEVIEW'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OR INSPECTION OF ACCUSED CAMERA SYSTEMS - granting in part and denying in part [380] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [386] Motion to Seal; granting [389] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [407] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [411] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting [413] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 9/9/24. (jrj) (Entered: 09/10/2024) MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO SEAL RELATED TO EAGLEVIEW'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OR INSPECTION OF ACCUSED CAMERA SYSTEMS - granting in part and denying in part [380] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [386] Motion to Seal; granting [389] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [407] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [411] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting [413] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 9/9/24. (jrj) (Entered: 09/10/2024)
09/10/24	Eagle View Technologies v. Nearmap 2:21-CV-00283 ( D. UT )	MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO SEAL RELATED TO EAGLEVIEW'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OR INSPECTION OF ACCUSED CAMERA SYSTEMS - granting in part and denying in part [380] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [386] Motion to Seal; granting [389] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [407] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [411] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting [413] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 9/9/24. (jrj) (Entered: 09/10/2024) MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO SEAL RELATED TO EAGLEVIEW'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OR INSPECTION OF ACCUSED CAMERA SYSTEMS - granting in part and denying in part [380] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [386] Motion to Seal; granting [389] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [407] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [411] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting [413] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 9/9/24. (jrj) (Entered: 09/10/2024)
09/10/24	Eagle View Technologies v. Nearmap 2:21-CV-00283 ( D. UT )	MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO SEAL RELATED TO NEARMAP'S DISCOVERY MOTION REGARDING OPENSOLAR AND CORELOGIC AGREEMENTS - granting in part and denying in part [350] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [357] Motion to Seal; granting in part and denying in part [377] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [394] Motion to Seal. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 9/9/24. (jrj) (Entered: 09/10/2024) MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO SEAL RELATED TO NEARMAP'S DISCOVERY MOTION REGARDING OPENSOLAR AND CORELOGIC AGREEMENTS - granting in part and denying in part [350] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [357] Motion to Seal; granting in part and denying in part [377] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [394] Motion to Seal. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 9/9/24. (jrj) (Entered: 09/10/2024)
09/10/24	Eagle View Technologies v. Nearmap 2:21-CV-00283 ( D. UT )	MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO SEAL RELATED TO NEARMAP'S DISCOVERY MOTION REGARDING OPENSOLAR AND CORELOGIC AGREEMENTS - granting in part and denying in part [350] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [357] Motion to Seal; granting in part and denying in part [377] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [394] Motion to Seal. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 9/9/24. (jrj) (Entered: 09/10/2024) MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO SEAL RELATED TO NEARMAP'S DISCOVERY MOTION REGARDING OPENSOLAR AND CORELOGIC AGREEMENTS - granting in part and denying in part [350] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [357] Motion to Seal; granting in part and denying in part [377] Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting in part and denying in part [394] Motion to Seal. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 9/9/24. (jrj) (Entered: 09/10/2024)
07/18/24	Eagle View Technologies v. Nearmap 2:21-CV-00283 ( D. UT )	NOTICE of Status of Patent Trial and Appeal Board Proceedings by Nearmap Australia, Nearmap LTD, Nearmap US (Hatch, Brent) (Entered: 07/18/2024)
07/18/24	Eagle View Technologies v. Nearmap 2:21-CV-00283 ( D. UT )	NOTICE of Status of Patent Trial and Appeal Board Proceedings by Nearmap Australia, Nearmap LTD, Nearmap US (Hatch, Brent) (Entered: 07/18/2024)
05/17/24	Eagle View Technologies v. Nearmap 2:21-CV-00283 ( D. UT )	DOCKET TEXT ORDER denying 415 Nearmap's Motion for Sanctions. Nearmap requests an award of fees and expenses incurred in responding to: (1) EagleView's motion to compel 379, and (2) EagleView's objections 406 to the order denying that motion. Pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court declines to award expenses to Nearmap because EagleView's position in the motion to compel and objection was substantially justified. Therefore, Nearmap's motion for sanctions is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 5/17/2024. No attached document. (med) (Entered: 05/17/2024) DOCKET TEXT ORDER denying 415 Nearmap's Motion for Sanctions. Nearmap requests an award of fees and expenses incurred in responding to: (1) EagleView's motion to compel 379, and (2) EagleView's objections 406 to the order denying that motion. Pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court declines to award expenses to Nearmap because EagleView's position in the motion to compel and objection was substantially justified. Therefore, Nearmap's motion for sanctions is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 5/17/2024. No attached document. (med) (Entered: 05/17/2024)
05/17/24	Eagle View Technologies v. Nearmap 2:21-CV-00283 ( D. UT )	DOCKET TEXT ORDER denying 415 Nearmap's Motion for Sanctions. Nearmap requests an award of fees and expenses incurred in responding to: (1) EagleView's motion to compel 379, and (2) EagleView's objections 406 to the order denying that motion. Pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court declines to award expenses to Nearmap because EagleView's position in the motion to compel and objection was substantially justified. Therefore, Nearmap's motion for sanctions is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 5/17/2024. No attached document. (med) (Entered: 05/17/2024) DOCKET TEXT ORDER denying 415 Nearmap's Motion for Sanctions. Nearmap requests an award of fees and expenses incurred in responding to: (1) EagleView's motion to compel 379, and (2) EagleView's objections 406 to the order denying that motion. Pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court declines to award expenses to Nearmap because EagleView's position in the motion to compel and objection was substantially justified. Therefore, Nearmap's motion for sanctions is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 5/17/2024. No attached document. (med) (Entered: 05/17/2024)
05/16/24	Eagle View Technologies v. Nearmap 2:21-CV-00283 ( D. UT )	MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTION TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGES ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION AND INSPECTION - re 406 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 5/16/24. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
05/16/24	Eagle View Technologies v. Nearmap 2:21-CV-00283 ( D. UT )	MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTION TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGES ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION AND INSPECTION - re 406 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 5/16/24. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)