Edge Systems LLC

General

Total Cases13
Active Cases3
Patents4
TypeOperating Company
Elite Ratings
--

Ratings

Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
L1
C
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
08/26/24
REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Edge Systems LLC, HYDRAFACIAL LLC. (Razai, Ali) (Entered: 08/26/2024)
08/26/24
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, identifying Beauty Health Co.. (Razai, Ali) (Entered: 08/26/2024)
08/26/24
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by PLAINTIFF Edge Systems LLC, HYDRAFACIAL LLC. (Razai, Ali) (Entered: 08/26/2024)
08/26/24
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by PLAINTIFF Edge Systems LLC, HYDRAFACIAL LLC. (Razai, Ali) (Entered: 08/26/2024)
08/26/24
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by PLAINTIFF Edge Systems LLC, HYDRAFACIAL LLC. (Razai, Ali) (Entered: 08/26/2024)
08/26/24
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Edge Systems LLC, HYDRAFACIAL LLC. (Razai, Ali) (Entered: 08/26/2024)
08/26/24
COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-38098472 - Fee: $405, filed by PLAINTIFF HYDRAFACIAL LLC, Edge Systems LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1-23) (Attorney Ali Razai added to party Edge Systems LLC(pty:pla), Attorney Ali Razai added to party HYDRAFACIAL LLC (pty:pla))(Razai, Ali) (Entered: 08/26/2024)
02/02/24
ORDER granting 109 Joint MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(ByronThomas, 4) (Entered: 02/02/2024)
02/02/24
Joint MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice by Edge Systems LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/23/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Morico, Paul) (Entered: 02/02/2024)
10/24/23
Minute Order for Motion Hearing held on 10/24/2023 before Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione: Murray for Plaintiff; Tepera, Keyko for Defendant. Defendant's Letter MOTION to Compel 103 is denied as untimely. Defendant has not demonstrated good cause for filing a discovery motion well over a year after the close of discovery. To the extent that Defendant seeks updated information from Plaintiff's expert about his fees and expenses to date, such information can be obtained via a trial subpoena so Plaintiff should have its expert begin preparing that information for disclosure. (AT&T (12:40 - 12:55).) (LV) (Entered: 10/24/2023)