Electronic Theatre Controls Inc

General

Total Cases10

Active Cases1

Patents179

CourtsS.D. New York C.D. California N.D. California

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

electronic-theatre

electronic-theatre

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
01/31/25	Electronic Theatre Controls Inc v. Elation Lighting Inc 2:25-CV-00852 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Electronic Theatre Controls, Inc.. (Pagnanelli, Karin) (Entered: 01/31/2025)
01/31/25	Electronic Theatre Controls Inc v. Elation Lighting Inc 2:25-CV-00852 ( C.D. CA )	CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Electronic Theatre Controls, Inc. identifying that Electronic Theatre Controls, Inc. (a private non-governmental party) certifies that, as of this date, it has no corporate parents, affiliates, and/or subsidiaries with a pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case and there is no parent corporation or publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of its stock as Corporate Parent. (Pagnanelli, Karin) (Entered: 01/31/2025) CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Electronic Theatre Controls, Inc. identifying that Electronic Theatre Controls, Inc. (a private non-governmental party) certifies that, as of this date, it has no corporate parents, affiliates, and/or subsidiaries with a pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case and there is no parent corporation or publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of its stock as Corporate Parent. (Pagnanelli, Karin) (Entered: 01/31/2025)
01/31/25	Electronic Theatre Controls Inc v. Elation Lighting Inc 2:25-CV-00852 ( C.D. CA )	Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) [1] filed by Plaintiff Electronic Theatre Controls, Inc.. (Pagnanelli, Karin) (Entered: 01/31/2025)
01/31/25	Electronic Theatre Controls Inc v. Elation Lighting Inc 2:25-CV-00852 ( C.D. CA )	CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Electronic Theatre Controls, Inc.. (Pagnanelli, Karin) (Entered: 01/31/2025)
01/31/25	Electronic Theatre Controls Inc v. Elation Lighting Inc 2:25-CV-00852 ( C.D. CA )	COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-39018475 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Electronic Theatre Controls, Inc.. (Attorney Karin G. Pagnanelli added to party Electronic Theatre Controls, Inc.(pty:pla))(Pagnanelli, Karin) (Entered: 01/31/2025)
07/30/24	Harman Professional Inc v. Electronic Theatre Controls Inc 2:24-CV-02815 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (bm) (Entered: 07/30/2024)
07/30/24	Harman Professional Inc v. Electronic Theatre Controls Inc 2:24-CV-02815 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (bm) (Entered: 07/30/2024)
07/30/24	Harman Professional Inc v. Electronic Theatre Controls Inc 2:24-CV-02815 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (bm) (Entered: 07/30/2024)
07/30/24	Harman Professional Inc v. Electronic Theatre Controls Inc 2:24-CV-02815 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 34 : Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), the above-caption action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety. The District Court shall retain jurisdiction over resolution of any disputes arising out of the Parties' settlement agreement. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm) (Entered: 07/30/2024) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 34 : Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), the above-caption action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety. The District Court shall retain jurisdiction over resolution of any disputes arising out of the Parties' settlement agreement. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm) (Entered: 07/30/2024)
07/30/24	Harman Professional Inc v. Electronic Theatre Controls Inc 2:24-CV-02815 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 34 : Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), the above-caption action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety. The District Court shall retain jurisdiction over resolution of any disputes arising out of the Parties' settlement agreement. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm) (Entered: 07/30/2024) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 34 : Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), the above-caption action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety. The District Court shall retain jurisdiction over resolution of any disputes arising out of the Parties' settlement agreement. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm) (Entered: 07/30/2024)