Eon Reality Inc

General

Total Cases2

Active Cases1

Patents7

CourtsC.D. California E.D. Texas

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
01/30/25	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT [34] AND DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT [30] by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The court, hereby ORDERS that: 1. The Clerk's entry of default against Defendant Eon Reality, Inc. ("Defendant"), (Dkt. [28] ), is SET ASIDE. 2. Defendant's Answer, (Dkt. 32), filed on January 29, 2025, is ACCEPTED AS FILED; and 3. Plaintiff's Application for Default Judgment, (Dkt. [30] ), is DENIED AS MOOT, and the February 20, 2025, hearing associated with the Application for Default Judgment is VACATED. (es) (Entered: 01/30/2025) ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT [34] AND DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT [30] by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The court, hereby ORDERS that: 1. The Clerk's entry of default against Defendant Eon Reality, Inc. ("Defendant"), (Dkt. [28] ), is SET ASIDE. 2. Defendant's Answer, (Dkt. 32), filed on January 29, 2025, is ACCEPTED AS FILED; and 3. Plaintiff's Application for Default Judgment, (Dkt. [30] ), is DENIED AS MOOT, and the February 20, 2025, hearing associated with the Application for Default Judgment is VACATED. (es) (Entered: 01/30/2025)
01/30/25	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: Scheduling Conference is set for 4/10/2025 at 9:00 a.m. Counsel shall review full Order for details. (rrp) (Entered: 01/30/2025)
01/29/25	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	STIPULATION to Set Aside Default as to EON Reality, Inc. filed by Defendant Eon Reality, Inc.. (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order)(Dallmann, Andrew) (Entered: 01/29/2025)
01/29/25	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Eon Reality, Inc., (Dallmann, Andrew) (Entered: 01/29/2025)
01/29/25	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) [1] with JURY DEMAND , COUNTERCLAIM against Eon Reality, Inc. filed by Defendant Eon Reality, Inc..(Attorney Andrew S. Dallmann added to party Eon Reality, Inc.(pty:dft))(Dallmann, Andrew) (Entered: 01/29/2025)
01/21/25	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: On January 17, 2025, Plaintiff Flick Intelligence, LLC filed an "Application for Entry of Default Judgment" ("Motion") but failed to include a written notice of motion or select a hearing date. See L.R. 6 ("Every motion shall be presented by written notice of motion... and filed with the Clerk not later than twenty-eight (28) days before the date set for hearing."). Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, SETS the Motion for hearing on February 20, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. PST in Courtroom 10D. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rrp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 01/21/2025) SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: On January 17, 2025, Plaintiff Flick Intelligence, LLC filed an "Application for Entry of Default Judgment" ("Motion") but failed to include a written notice of motion or select a hearing date. See L.R. 6 ("Every motion shall be presented by written notice of motion... and filed with the Clerk not later than twenty-eight (28) days before the date set for hearing."). Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, SETS the Motion for hearing on February 20, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. PST in Courtroom 10D. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rrp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 01/21/2025)
01/17/25	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	APPLICATION for Default Judgment against Defendant EON Reality, Inc. filed by Plaintiff Flick Intelligence, LLC. (Attachments: # [1] Declaration of Susan S.Q. Kalra, # [2] Exhibit A, # [3] Proposed Order) (Kalra, Susan) (Entered: 01/17/2025)
12/27/24	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: On December 6, 2024, the Court issued an Order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution [24] . On December 11, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Response [25] . For the reasons stated in the Response [25] , the court continued the deadline to the Order to Show Cause to December 26, 2024 26 . On December 20, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Request for Clerk to Enter Default [27] . Default was subsequently entered [28] . In light of this responsive filing, the Court hereby orders the OSC discharged. The court DIRECTS Plaintiff(s) to file a motion for default judgment on or before January 17, 2025. Failure to file a motion for default judgment or seek other appropriate relief by the courts deadline may result in dismissal without further order or notice from the court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629 (1962) (The authority of a federal trial court to dismiss a plaintiffs action with prejudice because of his failure to prosecute cannot seriously be doubted.); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) ([C]ourts may dismiss under Rule 41(b) sua sponte, at least under certain circumstances.); Ash v. Cvetkov, 739 F.2d 493, 496 (9th Cir. 1984) (It is within the inherent power of the court to sua sponte dismiss a case for lack of prosecution.). THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 12/27/2024) (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: On December 6, 2024, the Court issued an Order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution [24] . On December 11, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Response [25] . For the reasons stated in the Response [25] , the court continued the deadline to the Order to Show Cause to December 26, 2024 26 . On December 20, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Request for Clerk to Enter Default [27] . Default was subsequently entered [28] . In light of this responsive filing, the Court hereby orders the OSC discharged. The court DIRECTS Plaintiff(s) to file a motion for default judgment on or before January 17, 2025. Failure to file a motion for default judgment or seek other appropriate relief by the courts deadline may result in dismissal without further order or notice from the court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629 (1962) (The authority of a federal trial court to dismiss a plaintiffs action with prejudice because of his failure to prosecute cannot seriously be doubted.); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) ([C]ourts may dismiss under Rule 41(b) sua sponte, at least under certain circumstances.); Ash v. Cvetkov, 739 F.2d 493, 496 (9th Cir. 1984) (It is within the inherent power of the court to sua sponte dismiss a case for lack of prosecution.). THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 12/27/2024)
12/27/24	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Defendant Eon Reality, Inc. (jp) (Entered: 12/27/2024)
12/20/24	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant, EON Reality, Inc. Eon Reality, Inc. filed by Plaintiff Flick Intelligence, LLC. (Kalra, Susan) (Entered: 12/20/2024)