Epic Games Inc
General
Total Cases17
Active Cases3
Patents16
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
L4
B
CAFC
--
--
--
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
---|---|---|
08/22/24 | REPORT & RECOMMENDATION re: [27] MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Epic Games, Inc. Because Plaintiff has not plausibly alleged that Defendant's products infringe, the Motion to Dismiss should be GRANTED and the Amended Complaint dismissed with prejudice. V. FILING OF OBJECTIONS TO THIS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties shall have fourteen days from service of this Report to file written objections. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Such objections, and any responses to objections shall be filed with the Clerk of Court and on ECF. Any requests for an extension of time for filing objections must be directed to Judge Woods. Failure to file objections within fourteen days will result in a waiver of objections and will preclude appellate review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Cephas v. Nash, 328 F.3d 98, 107 (2d Cir. 2003). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to close Dkt. No. 27. SO ORDERED. (Objections to R&R due by 9/4/2024.) Motions terminated: [27] MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Epic Games, Inc. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer E. Willis on 8/21/2024) (mml) (Entered: 08/22/2024) | |
08/22/24 | REPORT & RECOMMENDATION re: 27 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Epic Games, Inc. Because Plaintiff has not plausibly alleged that Defendant's products infringe, the Motion to Dismiss should be GRANTED and the Amended Complaint dismissed with prejudice. V. FILING OF OBJECTIONS TO THIS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties shall have fourteen days from service of this Report to file written objections. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Such objections, and any responses to objections shall be filed with the Clerk of Court and on ECF. Any requests for an extension of time for filing objections must be directed to Judge Woods. Failure to file objections within fourteen days will result in a waiver of objections and will preclude appellate review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Cephas v. Nash, 328 F.3d 98, 107 (2d Cir. 2003). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to close Dkt. No. 27. SO ORDERED. (Objections to R&R due by 9/4/2024.) Motions terminated: 27 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Epic Games, Inc. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer E. Willis on 8/21/2024) (mml) (Entered: 08/22/2024) | |
08/06/24 | NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a STATUS CONFERENCE proceeding held on 3/13/2024 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days....(js) (Entered: 08/06/2024) | |
08/06/24 | TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: STATUS CONFERENCE held on 3/13/2024 before Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Adrienne Mignano, (212) 805-0300. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/27/2024. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/6/2024. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/4/2024. (js) (Entered: 08/06/2024) | |
04/08/24 | CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND REPORT OF RULE 26(f) MEETING: Last date to join other parties: August 1, 2024. The parties have discussed the possibility of settlement. The parties request a settlement conference by no later than March 27, 2026. The parties anticipate that this case will be ready for trial by September 16, 2026. The parties anticipate that the trial of this case will require 4 days. The parties request a jury trial. The parties do not consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction at this time. The parties are advised that they may consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction at any time during the case pursuant to 28 USC Section 636(c). To consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction for all purposes or specific dispositive motions, please utilize the consent form on Judge Willis's Individual Practices Webpage. SO ORDERED. Joinder of Parties due by 8/1/2024. Deposition due by 12/12/2025. Expert Discovery due by 3/27/2026. Ready for Trial by 9/16/2026. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer E. Willis on 4/8/2024) (tg) (Entered: 04/08/2024) | |
04/08/24 | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jennifer E. Willis: Case Management Conference held on 3/13/2024. (cda) (Entered: 04/08/2024) | |
03/20/24 | REPLY to Response to Motion re: [27] MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. . Document filed by Epic Games, Inc...(Welsh, Margaret) (Entered: 03/20/2024) | |
03/20/24 | REPLY to Response to Motion re: 27 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. . Document filed by Epic Games, Inc...(Welsh, Margaret) (Entered: 03/20/2024) | |
03/14/24 | ORDER granting [38] Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re [38] LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to [23] Amended Complaint addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from William P. Ramey, III dated 03/13/2024. Application granted. Plaintiff's post hoc March 13, 2024 request for an extension of time to file its opposition to defendants motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 38, is granted. Plaintiff's opposition, already filed on March 13, 2024 at Dkt. No. 37, is accepted as part of the briefing on the motion. Defendant's reply, if any, is due one week following the date of service of Plaintiff's opposition. Counsel are reminded to comply in the future with the Court's Individual Rule 1(E), which requires requests for extensions of time to be made at least two business days prior to the original due date. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 38. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 3/13/24) (yv) (Entered: 03/14/2024) | |
03/14/24 | ORDER granting 38 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 38 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 23 Amended Complaint addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from William P. Ramey, III dated 03/13/2024. Application granted. Plaintiff's post hoc March 13, 2024 request for an extension of time to file its opposition to defendants motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 38, is granted. Plaintiff's opposition, already filed on March 13, 2024 at Dkt. No. 37, is accepted as part of the briefing on the motion. Defendant's reply, if any, is due one week following the date of service of Plaintiff's opposition. Counsel are reminded to comply in the future with the Court's Individual Rule 1(E), which requires requests for extensions of time to be made at least two business days prior to the original due date. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 38. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 3/13/24) (yv) (Entered: 03/14/2024) |