Epic Systems Corp

General

Total Cases24

Active Cases1

Patents48

CourtsE.D. Texas S.D. Florida W.D. Wisconsin

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

L2

B

PTAB

L2

C

CAFC

L2

B

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
07/30/24	Epic Systems Corp v. Decapolis Systems LLC 9:22-CV-80173 ( S.D. FL )	ORDER granting in part 82 Motion for Bill of Costs; granting in part 88 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 97 Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 7/30/2024. See attached document for full details. (drz) (Entered: 07/30/2024)
06/07/24	Epic Systems Corp v. Decapolis Systems LLC 9:22-CV-80173 ( S.D. FL )	REPLY to Response to Motion re 104 Motion for Leave to File/Supplement Motion for Attorneys' Fees filed by Epic Systems Corporation. (Edson, Kelli) (Entered: 06/07/2024)
05/31/24	Epic Systems Corp v. Decapolis Systems LLC 9:22-CV-80173 ( S.D. FL )	RESPONSE in Opposition re 104 Motion for Leave to File/Supplement Motion for Attorneys' Fees filed by Decapolis Systems, LLC. Replies due by 6/7/2024. (Kesten, Marc) (Entered: 05/31/2024)
05/30/24	Epic Systems Corp v. Decapolis Systems LLC 9:22-CV-80173 ( S.D. FL )	PAPERLESS ORDER granting 109 Defendant's Motion for Leave to File its opposition brief. On May 2, 2024, Plaintiff moved to supplement its pending Motion for attorneys' fees with the fees it incurred in appealing this matter. (DE 104 ). The certificate of conferral represented that Defendant did not object to Plaintiff's ability to supplement its Motion, but that Defendant objected to the merits of Plaintiff's entitlement to fees and the fee amount. Accordingly, I entered a paperless order (DE 106 ) and informed the Parties that I would consider Plaintiff's supplemental material but allowed Defendant the standard two-week period, or until May 17, 2024, to file a response in opposition to the amount that Plaintiff represented it had incurred on appeal. Defendant failed to timely file a response. Now, Defendant seeks to file its response brief (DE [109-1]) to Plaintiff's supplemental information. I note that Defendant wholly fails to provide any explanation whatsoever as to why it failed to submit a response by the Court-ordered deadline. This is unacceptable. Nevertheless, because the relief is unopposed by Plaintiff, and because I believe any forthcoming order ruling on the merits of Plaintiff's Motion for attorneys' fees can only benefit from full briefing as to all incurred fees and costs, I will grant Defendant's Motion. Defendant has until May 31, 2024, to separately file its attached brief in opposition to Plaintiff's supplement. I remind the Parties that despite this being a closed case, failure to comply with Court orders is possible grounds for sanctions. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 5/30/2024. (mjn) (Entered: 05/30/2024) PAPERLESS ORDER granting 109 Defendant's Motion for Leave to File its opposition brief. On May 2, 2024, Plaintiff moved to supplement its pending Motion for attorneys' fees with the fees it incurred in appealing this matter. (DE 104 ). The certificate of conferral represented that Defendant did not object to Plaintiff's ability to supplement its Motion, but that Defendant objected to the merits of Plaintiff's entitlement to fees and the fee amount. Accordingly, I entered a paperless order (DE 106 ) and informed the Parties that I would consider Plaintiff's supplemental material but allowed Defendant the standard two-week period, or until May 17, 2024, to file a response in opposition to the amount that Plaintiff represented it had incurred on appeal. Defendant failed to timely file a response. Now, Defendant seeks to file its response brief (DE [109-1]) to Plaintiff's supplemental information. I note that Defendant wholly fails to provide any explanation whatsoever as to why it failed to submit a response by the Court-ordered deadline. This is unacceptable. Nevertheless, because the relief is unopposed by Plaintiff, and because I believe any forthcoming order ruling on the merits of Plaintiff's Motion for attorneys' fees can only benefit from full briefing as to all incurred fees and costs, I will grant Defendant's Motion. Defendant has until May 31, 2024, to separately file its attached brief in opposition to Plaintiff's supplement. I remind the Parties that despite this being a closed case, failure to comply with Court orders is possible grounds for sanctions. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 5/30/2024. (mjn) (Entered: 05/30/2024)
05/24/24	Epic Systems Corp v. Decapolis Systems LLC 9:22-CV-80173 ( S.D. FL )	MOTION for Leave to File by Decapolis Systems, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Opposition to Motion re Supplemental Attorney Fees, # 2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Kesten, Marc) (Entered: 05/24/2024)
05/21/24	Synkloud Tech LLC v. Epic Systems Corp 3:24-CV-00030 ( W.D. WI )	Report on Filing of Patent or Trademark Action. Copy provided to the US Patent and Trademark Office electronically. (Attachments: # 1 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal) (jat) (Entered: 05/21/2024)
05/21/24	Synkloud Tech LLC v. Epic Systems Corp 3:24-CV-00030 ( W.D. WI )	Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), this case is closed without further order of the court. (jat) (Entered: 05/21/2024)
05/20/24	Synkloud Tech LLC v. Epic Systems Corp 3:24-CV-00030 ( W.D. WI )	STIPULATION of Dismissal (Myers, Gregory) (Entered: 05/20/2024)
05/14/24	Epic Systems Corp v. Decapolis Systems LLC 9:22-CV-80173 ( S.D. FL )	MANDATE of USCA for the Federal Circuit (certified copy). AFFIRMED Order/Judgment of the district court with USCA court's opinion re 81 Notice of Appeal, filed by Decapolis Systems, LLC; Date Issued: 5/13/2024; USCA for the Federal Circuit Case Number: 23-1302. (apz) (Entered: 05/14/2024)
05/14/24	Epic Systems Corp v. Decapolis Systems LLC 9:22-CV-80173 ( S.D. FL )	Clerk's Notice of Docket Correction re 103 USCA Mandate. Document Restricted Due to Error; The correct document has been filed at DE 107 . (apz) (Entered: 05/14/2024)