Eyelight Inc

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases1

Patents--

CourtsC.D. California

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
03/28/22	Elt Sight Inc v. Eyelight Inc 2:19-CV-05545 ( C.D. CA )	REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Counter-Claim [227] filed by Counter Defendant Elliot Friedman. (Attachments: # [1] Response to Counter-Claimants' Additional Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law, # [2] Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Derek Meyer in Support of Counter-Claimants Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment, # [3] Declaration of Steven Bledsoe in support of Reply, # [4] Exhibit X, # [5] Exhibit Y, # [6] Exhibit Z, # [7] Exhibit AA, # [8] Exhibit BB, # [9] Exhibit CC, # [10] Proposed Order re Evidentiary Objections to Declaration of Derek Meyer)(Bledsoe, Steven) REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Counter-Claim [227] filed by Counter Defendant Elliot Friedman. (Attachments: # [1] Response to Counter-Claimants' Additional Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law, # [2] Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Derek Meyer in Support of Counter-Claimants Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment, # [3] Declaration of Steven Bledsoe in support of Reply, # [4] Exhibit X, # [5] Exhibit Y, # [6] Exhibit Z, # [7] Exhibit AA, # [8] Exhibit BB, # [9] Exhibit CC, # [10] Proposed Order re Evidentiary Objections to Declaration of Derek Meyer)(Bledsoe, Steven)
03/04/22	Elt Sight Inc v. Eyelight Inc 2:19-CV-05545 ( C.D. CA )	Additional Statement of Uncontroverted Facts re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Counter-Claim [227] filed by Counter Claimant Michael S. Berlin. (Attachments: # [1] Genuine Disputes of Material Fact)(Meyer, Derek)
03/04/22	Elt Sight Inc v. Eyelight Inc 2:19-CV-05545 ( C.D. CA )	DECLARATION of Derek J. Meyer In Support of Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Counter-Claim [227] filed by Counter Claimant Michael S. Berlin. (Attachments: # [1] Declaration of Dr. Michael S. Berlin (Exhibit 1), # [2] Declaration of Stanley Miele (Exhibit 2), # [3] Exhibit 3, # [4] Exhibit 4, # [5] Exhibit 5, # [6] Exhibit 6, # [7] Exhibit 7, # [8] Exhibit 8, # [9] Exhibit 9, # [10] Exhibit 10, # [11] Exhibit 11, # [12] Exhibit 12, # [13] Exhibit 13, # [14] Exhibit 14, # [15] Exhibit 15, # [16] Exhibit 16, # [17] Exhibit 17, # [18] Exhibit 18, # [19] Exhibit 19, # [20] Exhibit 20, # [21] Exhibit 21, # [22] Exhibit 22, # [23] Exhibit 23, # [24] Exhibit 24, # [25] Exhibit 25, # [26] Exhibit 26, # [27] Exhibit 27, # [28] Exhibit 28, # [29] Exhibit 29, # [30] Exhibit 30, # [31] Exhibit 31, # [32] Exhibit 32, # [33] Exhibit 33, # [34] Exhibit 34, # [35] Exhibit 35, # [36] Exhibit 36, # [37] Exhibit 37, # [38] Exhibit 38, # [39] Exhibit 39, # [40] Exhibit 40, # [41] Exhibit 41, # [42] Exhibit 42, # [43] Exhibit 43, # [44] Exhibit 44, # [45] Exhibit 45, # [46] Exhibit 46, # [47] Exhibit 47, # [48] Exhibit 48, # [49] Exhibit 49, # [50] Exhibit 50, # [51] Exhibit 51, # [52] Exhibit 52, # [53] Exhibit 53, # [54] Exhibit 54, # [55] Exhibit 55, # [56] Exhibit 56, # [57] Exhibit 57, # [58] Exhibit 58, # [59] Exhibit 59, # [60] Exhibit 60, # [61] Exhibit 61)(Meyer, Derek) DECLARATION of Derek J. Meyer In Support of Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Counter-Claim [227] filed by Counter Claimant Michael S. Berlin. (Attachments: # [1] Declaration of Dr. Michael S. Berlin (Exhibit 1), # [2] Declaration of Stanley Miele (Exhibit 2), # [3] Exhibit 3, # [4] Exhibit 4, # [5] Exhibit 5, # [6] Exhibit 6, # [7] Exhibit 7, # [8] Exhibit 8, # [9] Exhibit 9, # [10] Exhibit 10, # [11] Exhibit 11, # [12] Exhibit 12, # [13] Exhibit 13, # [14] Exhibit 14, # [15] Exhibit 15, # [16] Exhibit 16, # [17] Exhibit 17, # [18] Exhibit 18, # [19] Exhibit 19, # [20] Exhibit 20, # [21] Exhibit 21, # [22] Exhibit 22, # [23] Exhibit 23, # [24] Exhibit 24, # [25] Exhibit 25, # [26] Exhibit 26, # [27] Exhibit 27, # [28] Exhibit 28, # [29] Exhibit 29, # [30] Exhibit 30, # [31] Exhibit 31, # [32] Exhibit 32, # [33] Exhibit 33, # [34] Exhibit 34, # [35] Exhibit 35, # [36] Exhibit 36, # [37] Exhibit 37, # [38] Exhibit 38, # [39] Exhibit 39, # [40] Exhibit 40, # [41] Exhibit 41, # [42] Exhibit 42, # [43] Exhibit 43, # [44] Exhibit 44, # [45] Exhibit 45, # [46] Exhibit 46, # [47] Exhibit 47, # [48] Exhibit 48, # [49] Exhibit 49, # [50] Exhibit 50, # [51] Exhibit 51, # [52] Exhibit 52, # [53] Exhibit 53, # [54] Exhibit 54, # [55] Exhibit 55, # [56] Exhibit 56, # [57] Exhibit 57, # [58] Exhibit 58, # [59] Exhibit 59, # [60] Exhibit 60, # [61] Exhibit 61)(Meyer, Derek)
03/04/22	Elt Sight Inc v. Eyelight Inc 2:19-CV-05545 ( C.D. CA )	MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Counter-Claim [227] filed by Counter Claimant Michael S. Berlin. (Meyer, Derek)
03/03/22	Elt Sight Inc v. Eyelight Inc 2:19-CV-05545 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER RE: STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [245] by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Stipulation is APPROVED as follows: (1) Counter-Claimants shall have until March 3, 2022 to file their response to the Motion for Summary Judgment. (2) Friedman shall have until March 28, 2022 to file his reply. (lom)
03/01/22	Elt Sight Inc v. Eyelight Inc 2:19-CV-05545 ( C.D. CA )	STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response and Reply as to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Counter-Claim [227] filed by Counter-Claimant Michael S. Berlin. (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order)(Meyer, Derek)
02/28/22	Elt Sight Inc v. Eyelight Inc 2:19-CV-05545 ( C.D. CA )	RESPONSE filed by Defendant Michael S. Berlinto APPLICATION to file document Motion for Summary Judgment, Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law, Exhibit B, Exhibit C, Exhibit F, Exhibit G, Exhibit H, Exhibit I, Exhibit J, Exhibit K, Exhibit L, Exhibit M, Exhibit O, Exhibit P, [228] SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MATERIALS UNDER SEAL [DKT. 228] (Bisbikis, John) RESPONSE filed by Defendant Michael S. Berlinto APPLICATION to file document Motion for Summary Judgment, Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law, Exhibit B, Exhibit C, Exhibit F, Exhibit G, Exhibit H, Exhibit I, Exhibit J, Exhibit K, Exhibit L, Exhibit M, Exhibit O, Exhibit P, [228] SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MATERIALS UNDER SEAL [DKT. 228] (Bisbikis, John)
02/17/22	Elt Sight Inc v. Eyelight Inc 2:19-CV-05545 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER RE: STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [242] by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED as follows: (1) Counter-Claimants shall have until February 28, 2022 to file their response to the Motion for Summary Judgment. (2) Friedman shall have until March 14, 2022 to file his reply. (3) The same dates shall apply with respect to additional briefing on Friedman's Application for Leave to File Materials Under Seal in Connection with Counter-Defendant Friedmans Motion for Summary Judgement. (4) Counter-Claimants further response brief with declaration in support of sealing shall be due February 28, 2022. And (5) Friedmans optional reply shall be due March 14, 2022. (jp) ORDER RE: STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [242] by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED as follows: (1) Counter-Claimants shall have until February 28, 2022 to file their response to the Motion for Summary Judgment. (2) Friedman shall have until March 14, 2022 to file his reply. (3) The same dates shall apply with respect to additional briefing on Friedman's Application for Leave to File Materials Under Seal in Connection with Counter-Defendant Friedmans Motion for Summary Judgement. (4) Counter-Claimants further response brief with declaration in support of sealing shall be due February 28, 2022. And (5) Friedmans optional reply shall be due March 14, 2022. (jp)
01/31/22	Elt Sight Inc v. Eyelight Inc 2:19-CV-05545 ( C.D. CA )	SEALED DOCUMENT MODIFIED EXHIBIT C re APPLICATION to file document Motion for Summary Judgment, Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law, Exhibit B, Exhibit C, Exhibit F, Exhibit G, Exhibit H, Exhibit I, Exhibit J, Exhibit K, Exhibit L, Exhibit M, Exhibit O, Exhibit P, [228] , Order, [240] filed by Counter Defendant Elliot Friedman.(Bledsoe, Steven)
01/28/22	Elt Sight Inc v. Eyelight Inc 2:19-CV-05545 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER RE: STIPULATION RE: MODIFICATION OF EXHIBIT C TO THE DECLARATION OF STEVEN E. BLEDSOE IN SUPPORT OF COUNTER DEFENDANT ELLIOT FRIEDMAN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [239] by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. Counter-Defendant shall modify and refile with the Court Dkt. No. 229-4 so that only the portions of the deposition transcript cited and relied upon byCounter-Defendant in his Motion for Summary Judgment are included in Exhibit C. (jp) ORDER RE: STIPULATION RE: MODIFICATION OF EXHIBIT C TO THE DECLARATION OF STEVEN E. BLEDSOE IN SUPPORT OF COUNTER DEFENDANT ELLIOT FRIEDMAN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [239] by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. Counter-Defendant shall modify and refile with the Court Dkt. No. 229-4 so that only the portions of the deposition transcript cited and relied upon byCounter-Defendant in his Motion for Summary Judgment are included in Exhibit C. (jp)