Far Uv Technologies Inc

General

Total Cases7

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsW.D. Missouri N.D. Texas

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

PTAB

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

L4

A

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
10/27/22	S Edward Neister v. Far Uv Technologies 3:22-CV-00280 ( N.D. TX )	The following patents were Instituted by PTAB: Patent US8975605 in IPR2022-00682
08/15/22	S Edward Neister v. Far Uv Technologies 3:22-CV-00280 ( N.D. TX )	The following patents were Instituted by PTAB: Patent US9700642 in IPR2022-00381
04/04/22	S Edward Neister v. Far Uv Technologies 3:22-CV-00280 ( N.D. TX )	ORDER granting 74 Joint MOTION to Extend Time to Conduct Claim Construction Exchanges. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 4/4/2022) (jmg) (Entered: 04/04/2022)
03/25/22	S Edward Neister v. Far Uv Technologies 3:22-CV-00280 ( N.D. TX )	SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Far UV Technologies filed by High Energy Ozone LLC, S Edward Neister. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) 1, # 2 Exhibit(s) 2, # 3 Exhibit(s) 3, # 4 Exhibit(s) 4, # 5 Exhibit(s) 5, # 6 Exhibit(s) 6, # 7 Exhibit(s) 7, # 8 Exhibit(s) 8, # 9 Exhibit(s) 9, # 10 Exhibit(s) 10, # 11 Exhibit(s) 11, # 12 Exhibit(s) 12, # 13 Exhibit(s) 13) (Ray, Brent) (Entered: 03/25/2022) SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Far UV Technologies filed by High Energy Ozone LLC, S Edward Neister. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) 1, # 2 Exhibit(s) 2, # 3 Exhibit(s) 3, # 4 Exhibit(s) 4, # 5 Exhibit(s) 5, # 6 Exhibit(s) 6, # 7 Exhibit(s) 7, # 8 Exhibit(s) 8, # 9 Exhibit(s) 9, # 10 Exhibit(s) 10, # 11 Exhibit(s) 11, # 12 Exhibit(s) 12, # 13 Exhibit(s) 13) (Ray, Brent) (Entered: 03/25/2022)
03/25/22	S Edward Neister v. Far Uv Technologies 3:22-CV-00280 ( N.D. TX )	ORDER: Before the Court are a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (ECF No. 22) and a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 24) filed by Far UV Technologies. The Motions are rendered moot by the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 39) and therefore are DENIED. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 3/25/2022) (jmg) (Entered: 03/25/2022)
03/25/22	S Edward Neister v. Far Uv Technologies 3:22-CV-00280 ( N.D. TX )	ORDER: Before the Court is Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaints Against Defendants Far UV Technologies and Eden Park Illumination, Inc. (ECF No. 69 ). The Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiffs should promptly file their Second Amended Complaint against Defendant Far UV and their First Amended Complaint against Defendant Eden Park. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 3/25/2022) (jmg) (Entered: 03/25/2022) ORDER: Before the Court is Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaints Against Defendants Far UV Technologies and Eden Park Illumination, Inc. (ECF No. 69 ). The Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiffs should promptly file their Second Amended Complaint against Defendant Far UV and their First Amended Complaint against Defendant Eden Park. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 3/25/2022) (jmg) (Entered: 03/25/2022)
03/25/22	S Edward Neister v. Far Uv Technologies 3:22-CV-00280 ( N.D. TX )	The following PTAB cases were filed: Patent US8975605 in IPR2022-00682
03/08/22	S Edward Neister v. Far Uv Technologies 3:22-CV-00280 ( N.D. TX )	ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES: Member cases 3:22-cv-425 and 3:22-cv-280 consolidated with lead case 3:21-cv-1166 for pretrial matters. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 3/8/2022) (mla) (Entered: 03/08/2022)
03/07/22	S Edward Neister v. Far Uv Technologies 3:22-CV-00280 ( N.D. TX )	ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn for all further proceedings. Judge David C Godbey no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 3/7/2022) (ndt) (Entered: 03/07/2022)
02/22/22	S Edward Neister v. Far Uv Technologies 3:22-CV-00280 ( N.D. TX )	Joint STATUS REPORT filed by High Energy Ozone LLC. (Parsons, Abby) (Entered: 02/22/2022)