Flick Intelligence LLC

General

Total Cases13

Active Cases--

Patents6

CourtsW.D. Texas N.D. California C.D. California

TypeNPE

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

L2

E

PTAB

L4

E

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
01/17/25	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	APPLICATION for Default Judgment against Defendant EON Reality, Inc. filed by Plaintiff Flick Intelligence, LLC. (Attachments: # [1] Declaration of Susan S.Q. Kalra, # [2] Exhibit A, # [3] Proposed Order) (Kalra, Susan) (Entered: 01/17/2025)
12/27/24	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: On December 6, 2024, the Court issued an Order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution [24] . On December 11, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Response [25] . For the reasons stated in the Response [25] , the court continued the deadline to the Order to Show Cause to December 26, 2024 26 . On December 20, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Request for Clerk to Enter Default [27] . Default was subsequently entered [28] . In light of this responsive filing, the Court hereby orders the OSC discharged. The court DIRECTS Plaintiff(s) to file a motion for default judgment on or before January 17, 2025. Failure to file a motion for default judgment or seek other appropriate relief by the courts deadline may result in dismissal without further order or notice from the court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629 (1962) (The authority of a federal trial court to dismiss a plaintiffs action with prejudice because of his failure to prosecute cannot seriously be doubted.); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) ([C]ourts may dismiss under Rule 41(b) sua sponte, at least under certain circumstances.); Ash v. Cvetkov, 739 F.2d 493, 496 (9th Cir. 1984) (It is within the inherent power of the court to sua sponte dismiss a case for lack of prosecution.). THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 12/27/2024) (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: On December 6, 2024, the Court issued an Order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution [24] . On December 11, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Response [25] . For the reasons stated in the Response [25] , the court continued the deadline to the Order to Show Cause to December 26, 2024 26 . On December 20, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Request for Clerk to Enter Default [27] . Default was subsequently entered [28] . In light of this responsive filing, the Court hereby orders the OSC discharged. The court DIRECTS Plaintiff(s) to file a motion for default judgment on or before January 17, 2025. Failure to file a motion for default judgment or seek other appropriate relief by the courts deadline may result in dismissal without further order or notice from the court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629 (1962) (The authority of a federal trial court to dismiss a plaintiffs action with prejudice because of his failure to prosecute cannot seriously be doubted.); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) ([C]ourts may dismiss under Rule 41(b) sua sponte, at least under certain circumstances.); Ash v. Cvetkov, 739 F.2d 493, 496 (9th Cir. 1984) (It is within the inherent power of the court to sua sponte dismiss a case for lack of prosecution.). THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 12/27/2024)
12/27/24	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Defendant Eon Reality, Inc. (jp) (Entered: 12/27/2024)
12/20/24	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant, EON Reality, Inc. Eon Reality, Inc. filed by Plaintiff Flick Intelligence, LLC. (Kalra, Susan) (Entered: 12/20/2024)
12/12/24	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter CONTINUING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: On December 6, 2024, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution [24] . On December 11, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Response to the court's Order [25] . In light of Plaintiff's response and the reasons contained therein, the Court hereby continues the deadline to December 26, 2024. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiffs is due.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 12/12/2024) (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter CONTINUING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: On December 6, 2024, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution [24] . On December 11, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Response to the court's Order [25] . In light of Plaintiff's response and the reasons contained therein, the Court hereby continues the deadline to December 26, 2024. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiffs is due.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 12/12/2024)
12/11/24	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Flick Intelligence, LLCto Order to Show Cause, [24] (Kalra, Susan) (Entered: 12/11/2024)
12/06/24	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause in writing, no later than 12/11/2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. See document for further information. (jp) (Entered: 12/06/2024)
10/08/24	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Flick Intelligence, LLC, upon Defendant Eon Reality, Inc., served on 10/1/2024, answer due 10/22/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by serving Registered Agent upon Mats Johansson, individual accepting as Agent. (Kalra, Susan). Modified on 12/27/2024 (jp). (Entered: 10/08/2024) PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Flick Intelligence, LLC, upon Defendant Eon Reality, Inc., served on 10/1/2024, answer due 10/22/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by serving Registered Agent upon Mats Johansson, individual accepting as Agent. (Kalra, Susan). Modified on 12/27/2024 (jp). (Entered: 10/08/2024)
08/21/24	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO SERVE [20] AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE OF PROCESS [21] by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. Accordingly, the court DENIES the Motion for Alternative Service WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling with adequate support for the requested relief. The court EXTENDS the deadline for Plaintiff to serve Defendant in this case to and including December 2, 2024. Finally, the orders set forth in the court's July 19, 2024, Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution (Dkt. 15) are CONTINUED to and including December 2, 2024. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm) (Entered: 08/21/2024) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO SERVE [20] AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE OF PROCESS [21] by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. Accordingly, the court DENIES the Motion for Alternative Service WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling with adequate support for the requested relief. The court EXTENDS the deadline for Plaintiff to serve Defendant in this case to and including December 2, 2024. Finally, the orders set forth in the court's July 19, 2024, Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution (Dkt. 15) are CONTINUED to and including December 2, 2024. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm) (Entered: 08/21/2024)
08/14/24	Flick Intelligence LLC v. Eon Reality Inc 8:24-CV-00841 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to for Alternative Service filed by Plaintiff Flick Intelligence, LLC. (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order) (Kalra, Susan) (Entered: 08/14/2024)