Fuchi Pharmaceutical Co Ltd

General

Total Cases2

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsD. Delaware

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
01/23/25	Vitaworks IP LLC v. Glanbia Nutritionals Na Inc 1:21-CV-00327 ( D. DE )	ORAL ORDER: In light of the Court's order to stay this case, (D.I. 295), the Court hereby ORDERS that each of the following pending motions is DENIED without prejudice to renew, if and when the stay is lifted: (a) Defendants' Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Disputes, (D.I. [233] ); and (b) Defendants' Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Disputes, (D.I. [258] ). Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 01/23/2025. (smg) (Entered: 01/23/2025) ORAL ORDER: In light of the Court's order to stay this case, (D.I. 295), the Court hereby ORDERS that each of the following pending motions is DENIED without prejudice to renew, if and when the stay is lifted: (a) Defendants' Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Disputes, (D.I. [233] ); and (b) Defendants' Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Disputes, (D.I. [258] ). Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 01/23/2025. (smg) (Entered: 01/23/2025)
01/14/25	Vitaworks IP LLC v. Glanbia Nutritionals Na Inc 1:21-CV-00327 ( D. DE )	Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Kasey H. DeSantis regarding Parties positions on whether the Court may enter an order formally permitting withdrawal of Fox Rothschild LLP as counsel to Plaintiffs - re 294 Oral Order,,. (DeSantis, Kasey) (Entered: 01/14/2025)
01/14/25	Vitaworks IP LLC v. Glanbia Nutritionals Na Inc 1:21-CV-00327 ( D. DE )	ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the Suggestion of Bankruptcy filed regarding Plaintiffs Vitaworks IP, LLC and Vitaworks LLC (collectively Plaintiffs) (D.I. [293] ), hereby ORDERS as follows: (1) This case is STAYED pursuant to the provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 362 and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pending further order of the Court; and (2) the parties are ORDERED to provide a joint status report by no later than July 10, 2025 regarding the status of the bankruptcy proceeding and whether the stay of this case should remain in effect. Any party can move to lift the stay at any time if events warrant; if a party wishes to do so, it should file a one-page letter with the Court indicating this, and the Court will order further briefing if needed. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 1/14/2025. (ceg) (Entered: 01/14/2025) ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the Suggestion of Bankruptcy filed regarding Plaintiffs Vitaworks IP, LLC and Vitaworks LLC (collectively Plaintiffs) (D.I. [293] ), hereby ORDERS as follows: (1) This case is STAYED pursuant to the provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 362 and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pending further order of the Court; and (2) the parties are ORDERED to provide a joint status report by no later than July 10, 2025 regarding the status of the bankruptcy proceeding and whether the stay of this case should remain in effect. Any party can move to lift the stay at any time if events warrant; if a party wishes to do so, it should file a one-page letter with the Court indicating this, and the Court will order further briefing if needed. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 1/14/2025. (ceg) (Entered: 01/14/2025)
01/10/25	Vitaworks IP LLC v. Glanbia Nutritionals Na Inc 1:21-CV-00327 ( D. DE )	Oral Order: The Court, having reviewed Defendants' January 9, 2025 letter, (D.I. [292] ), and Plaintiffs' Suggestion of Bankruptcy, (D.I. [293] ), and in light of the automatic stay in this case under 11 U.S.C. Section 362, hereby ORDERS that, by no later than January 14, 2025, the parties shall jointly file a letter, not to exceed two (2) single-spaced pages, informing the Court as to their view on whether, even in light of the stay, the Court may enter an order formally permitting withdrawal of Fox Rothchild LLP as Plaintiff's counsel, as the Court indicated its intent to do in its December 5, 2024 Order, (D.I. 290 ). Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 01/10/2025. (smg) (Entered: 01/10/2025) Oral Order: The Court, having reviewed Defendants' January 9, 2025 letter, (D.I. [292] ), and Plaintiffs' Suggestion of Bankruptcy, (D.I. [293] ), and in light of the automatic stay in this case under 11 U.S.C. Section 362, hereby ORDERS that, by no later than January 14, 2025, the parties shall jointly file a letter, not to exceed two (2) single-spaced pages, informing the Court as to their view on whether, even in light of the stay, the Court may enter an order formally permitting withdrawal of Fox Rothchild LLP as Plaintiff's counsel, as the Court indicated its intent to do in its December 5, 2024 Order, (D.I. 290 ). Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 01/10/2025. (smg) (Entered: 01/10/2025)
01/09/25	Vitaworks IP LLC v. Glanbia Nutritionals Na Inc 1:21-CV-00327 ( D. DE )	SUGGESTION OF BANKRUPTCY Upon the Record by Vitaworks IP, LLC, Vitaworks, LLC. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit A)(DeSantis, Kasey) (Entered: 01/09/2025)
01/09/25	Vitaworks IP LLC v. Glanbia Nutritionals Na Inc 1:21-CV-00327 ( D. DE )	Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Anne Shea Gaza regarding Plaintiffs' Chapter 7 Voluntary Petitions for Bankruptcy. (Gaza, Anne) (Entered: 01/09/2025)
12/13/24	Vitaworks IP LLC v. Glanbia Nutritionals Na Inc 1:21-CV-00327 ( D. DE )	NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Mark Consilvio as co-counsel.. (Wilson, Samantha) (Entered: 12/13/2024)
12/05/24	Vitaworks IP LLC v. Glanbia Nutritionals Na Inc 1:21-CV-00327 ( D. DE )	ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed Fox Rothschild LLP’s (“Fox Rothschild”) Amended Motion to Withdraw as Attorney (“Motion”), (D.I. [282] ), and the briefing related thereto, (D.I. [265] ; D.I. [268] ; D.I. [271] ; D.I. [282] ; D.I. [283] ), having held a videoconference hearing regarding the Motion on December 3, 2024, and having considered relevant factors applicable to such motions set out in cases like Rasquinha v. O’Boyle, Civil No. 19-19846 (KSH), 2023 WL 199005, at 3 (D.N.J. Jan. 17, 2023), appeal dismissed sub nom., 2023 WL 9688354 (3d Cir. Sept. 29, 2023) and Ohntrup v. Makina ve Kimya Endustrisi Kurumu, 760 F.3d 290, 294-95 (3d Cir. 2014), hereby ORDERS that the Motion is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART in the manner and for the reasons that follow: (1) To the extent that Plaintiffs wish to obtain new counsel in this matter, any new counsel shall enter their appearance by no later than January 3, 2025. This will provide Plaintiffs with nearly 60 days to have searched for and to have obtained counsel, dating from the point when Fox Rothschild’s initial motion to withdraw was filed in this case. (See D.I. [265] ) Under all of the circumstances here, and for the reasons the Court noted during the videoconference, this amount of time provides Plaintiffs with an appropriate span in which to attempt to find new counsel, while not unduly prejudicing Defendants, who understandably wish for a timely resolution to this long-running matter.; (2) As the Court advised during the videoconference, the case schedule is hereby STAYED until further order of the Court.; (3) If new counsel does not enter an appearance for Plaintiffs by January 3, 2025, then absent further order of the Court, by no later than January 10, 2025, Defendants shall file any motion for default that they wish to file in the case, since Plaintiffs could not proceed with litigating this matter in the absence of retained counsel. See Dettmering v. VBit Techs. Corp., Civil Action No. 22-1482-CFC-SRF, 2023 WL 3790717, at 2 (D. Del. June 2, 2023); Medicolegal & Literary Works LLC v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for the Dist. of Del., C.A. No. 10-864-LPS, 2011 WL 4501041, at 2 (D. Del. Sept. 28, 2011) (citing cases). And in that circumstance, by no later than January 10, 2025, absent further order of the Court, Defendants shall also file any other motion relevant to the pendency of Plaintiffs’ affirmative claims.; (4) Fox Rothschild will remain as Plaintiffs’ counsel of record until further order of the Court. Among other things, this will permit Plaintiffs to communicate with the Court through counsel between now and January 3, 2025, if necessary. The Court anticipates ordering that Fox Rothschild will be permitted to withdraw as counsel to Plaintiffs as of January 10, 2025, in light of the reasons for withdraw set out in the Motion. See Fastxchange Inc. v. Inventure Inc., No. Civ.A. 03-782KAJ, 2004 WL 234659, at 1 (D. Del. Feb. 6, 2004) (permitting counsel’s withdrawal since the defendant "failed to cooperate in the preparation and presentation of its [case] and ha[d] ‘not expressed or demonstrated a willingness to satisfy its obligations’ to pay its legal fees and expenses”) (internal citation omitted); Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau v. Nat’l Collegiate Master Student Tr., Civil Action No. 17-1323-SB, D.I. 79-80 (D. Del. 2019) (granting counsel’s motion to withdraw, which explained that counsel was owed substantial legal fees and the client was unable to pay them, and where the client was permitted sufficient notice to identify and retain replacement counsel).; and (5) In light of Defendants’ understandable concerns regarding the preservation of certain relevant case-related evidence during this time period, the Court has so ordered the parties’ related stipulation, (D.I. [289] ), which will remain in effect until further order of the Court. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/5/2024. (smg) (Entered: 12/05/2024) ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed Fox Rothschild LLP’s (“Fox Rothschild”) Amended Motion to Withdraw as Attorney (“Motion”), (D.I. [282] ), and the briefing related thereto, (D.I. [265] ; D.I. [268] ; D.I. [271] ; D.I. [282] ; D.I. [283] ), having held a videoconference hearing regarding the Motion on December 3, 2024, and having considered relevant factors applicable to such motions set out in cases like Rasquinha v. O’Boyle, Civil No. 19-19846 (KSH), 2023 WL 199005, at 3 (D.N.J. Jan. 17, 2023), appeal dismissed sub nom., 2023 WL 9688354 (3d Cir. Sept. 29, 2023) and Ohntrup v. Makina ve Kimya Endustrisi Kurumu, 760 F.3d 290, 294-95 (3d Cir. 2014), hereby ORDERS that the Motion is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART in the manner and for the reasons that follow: (1) To the extent that Plaintiffs wish to obtain new counsel in this matter, any new counsel shall enter their appearance by no later than January 3, 2025. This will provide Plaintiffs with nearly 60 days to have searched for and to have obtained counsel, dating from the point when Fox Rothschild’s initial motion to withdraw was filed in this case. (See D.I. [265] ) Under all of the circumstances here, and for the reasons the Court noted during the videoconference, this amount of time provides Plaintiffs with an appropriate span in which to attempt to find new counsel, while not unduly prejudicing Defendants, who understandably wish for a timely resolution to this long-running matter.; (2) As the Court advised during the videoconference, the case schedule is hereby STAYED until further order of the Court.; (3) If new counsel does not enter an appearance for Plaintiffs by January 3, 2025, then absent further order of the Court, by no later than January 10, 2025, Defendants shall file any motion for default that they wish to file in the case, since Plaintiffs could not proceed with litigating this matter in the absence of retained counsel. See Dettmering v. VBit Techs. Corp., Civil Action No. 22-1482-CFC-SRF, 2023 WL 3790717, at 2 (D. Del. June 2, 2023); Medicolegal & Literary Works LLC v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for the Dist. of Del., C.A. No. 10-864-LPS, 2011 WL 4501041, at 2 (D. Del. Sept. 28, 2011) (citing cases). And in that circumstance, by no later than January 10, 2025, absent further order of the Court, Defendants shall also file any other motion relevant to the pendency of Plaintiffs’ affirmative claims.; (4) Fox Rothschild will remain as Plaintiffs’ counsel of record until further order of the Court. Among other things, this will permit Plaintiffs to communicate with the Court through counsel between now and January 3, 2025, if necessary. The Court anticipates ordering that Fox Rothschild will be permitted to withdraw as counsel to Plaintiffs as of January 10, 2025, in light of the reasons for withdraw set out in the Motion. See Fastxchange Inc. v. Inventure Inc., No. Civ.A. 03-782KAJ, 2004 WL 234659, at 1 (D. Del. Feb. 6, 2004) (permitting counsel’s withdrawal since the defendant "failed to cooperate in the preparation and presentation of its [case] and ha[d] ‘not expressed or demonstrated a willingness to satisfy its obligations’ to pay its legal fees and expenses”) (internal citation omitted); Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau v. Nat’l Collegiate Master Student Tr., Civil Action No. 17-1323-SB, D.I. 79-80 (D. Del. 2019) (granting counsel’s motion to withdraw, which explained that counsel was owed substantial legal fees and the client was unable to pay them, and where the client was permitted sufficient notice to identify and retain replacement counsel).; and (5) In light of Defendants’ understandable concerns regarding the preservation of certain relevant case-related evidence during this time period, the Court has so ordered the parties’ related stipulation, (D.I. [289] ), which will remain in effect until further order of the Court. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/5/2024. (smg) (Entered: 12/05/2024)
12/05/24	Vitaworks IP LLC v. Glanbia Nutritionals Na Inc 1:21-CV-00327 ( D. DE )	SO ORDERED, D.I. [289] Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Preservation of Evidence filed by Jiangyin Huachang Food Additive Co., Ltd., Glanbia Nutritionals (NA), Inc., Fuchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. d/b/a Hubei Grand Life Science and Technology Co., Ltd. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/5/2024. (smg) (Entered: 12/05/2024)
12/03/24	Vitaworks IP LLC v. Glanbia Nutritionals Na Inc 1:21-CV-00327 ( D. DE )	STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Regarding Preservation of Evidence by Jiangyin Huachang Food Additive Co., Ltd., Fuchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. d/b/a Hubei Grand Life Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Glanbia Nutritionals (NA), Inc.. (Wilson, Samantha) Modified on 12/5/2024 (smg). (Entered: 12/03/2024)