GCP Applied Technologies Inc
General
Total Cases1
Active Cases--
Patents--
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
L2
A
PTAB
L2
C
CAFC
--
--
--
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 03/07/22 | SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF filed by Defendant AVM Industries Inc. . regarding Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, [192] . (Muehlhauser, Douglas) | |
| 03/07/22 | Supplemental BRIEF filed by Plaintiff GCP Applied Technologies Inc. . Supplemental Briefing Pursuant to Dkt. [192] regarding Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, [192] . (Matthias, Michael) | |
| 03/03/22 | SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. On the Court's own motion, all pending dates and deadlines are vacated. The Court will reset dates, if needed, after it rules on the parties' pending motions for summary judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rs) TEXT ONLY ENTRY | |
| 03/02/22 | SCHEDULING NOTICE and ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Pursuant to General Order 21-08, Order of the Chief Judge 21-124, and Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, the Court finds DEFENDANT AVM INDUSTRIES, INC.'S MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND TRIAL DATE [185] appropriate for submission on the papers without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set on this motion for March 7, 2022 is vacated and taken off calendar. If the Court determines that a hearing is necessary, one will be reset at a later date. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rs) TEXT ONLY ENTRY | |
| 02/18/22 | REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to AMEND Scheduling Order [113] [185] filed by Defendant AVM Industries Inc. . (Muehlhauser, Douglas) | |
| 02/17/22 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Court ORDERS the parties to file supplemental briefing on the claim interpretation issue described above. The parties should include all relevant authorities that support their positions. The supplemental briefs shall not exceed five pages and the briefs must be submitted on or before March 7, 2022. (iv) | |
| 02/16/22 | MINUTES OF VTC MOTION NO.1 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,713,879 FOR INDEFINITENESS [116] . MOTION NO. 2 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,713,879 [119] . MOTION NO. 3 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF U.S PATENT NO. 8,713,879 [122] . MOTION NO. 4 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF UNENFORCEABILITY OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,713, 879 [125] . MOTION NO. 5. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO NON-ENTITLEMENT TO LOST PROFITS [128] . MOTION NO 6. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT FINDING NO INFRINGEMENT IN RELATION TO INTERNATIONAL SHIPMENTS [129] . MOTION NO. 7 FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT FINDING NO BASIS FOR ENHANCED DAMAGES NOR ATTORNEY FEES [130] . MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO ANTICIPATION AND NO OBVIOUSNESS OF DEPENDENT CLAIMS [134] . MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INFRINGEMENT OF CERTAIN ACCUSED PRODUCTS [135] . MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INEQUITABLE CONDUCT [136] . MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE INADVERTENTLY NOT TIMELY FILED IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION NOS. 5 AND 7 FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [139] . UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR GCP TO FILE A SUR-REPLY TO AVM'S REPLY MEMORANDUM REGARDING ITS MOTION TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE UNTIMELY FILED [178] held before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Case called, and counsel make their appearance. The Court invites counsel to present their oral arguments. Arguments by counsel are heard. For the reasons stated on the record, the Court takes the matter under submission. An order will issue. Court Reporter: Amy Diaz. (iv) | |
| 02/15/22 | NOTICE of Lodging Presentation Slides for Summary Judgment Hearing filed by Defendant AVM Industries Inc. . (Attachments: # [1] Presentation No. 1, # [2] Presentation No. 2, # [3] Presentation No. 3, # [4] Presentation No. 4, # [5] Presentation No. 5, # [6] Presentation No. 6, # [7] Presentation No. 7)(Muehlhauser, Douglas) | |
| 02/14/22 | MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to AMEND Scheduling Order [113] [185] Memorandum of Points & Authorities in Opposition to AVM's Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order and Trial Date filed by Plaintiff GCP Applied Technologies Inc. . (Attachments: # [1] Declaration of Phillip D. Wolfe in Support of GCP's Memorandum of Points & Authorities in Opposition to AVM's Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order and Trial Date, # [2] Exhibit A to Phillip D. Wolfe's Declaration)(Matthias, Michael) | |
| 02/09/22 | ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Robert Curcio to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant AVM Industries Inc. , designating Douglas Muehlhauser as local counsel [187] . (iv) |