Genetec Inc
General
Total Cases7
Active Cases--
Patents82
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
L3
A
PTAB
L5
D
CAFC
L3
D
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 07/01/24 | SO ORDERED, re 295 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to [See Stipulation for Details] re 282 Oral Order and 294 Joint Status Report filed by Sensormatic Electronics, LLC. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 7/1/24. (jaa) (Entered: 07/01/2024) | |
| 06/28/24 | STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to [See Stipulation for Details] re 282 Oral Order and 294 Joint Status Report - filed by Sensormatic Electronics, LLC. (Wilson, Samantha) (Entered: 06/28/2024) | |
| 06/28/24 | Joint STATUS REPORT re 282 Oral Order and 292 Joint Status Report by Sensormatic Electronics, LLC. (Wilson, Samantha) (Entered: 06/28/2024) | |
| 06/12/24 | SO ORDERED, re 293 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME re 282 Oral Order, 287 Joint Status Report and 292 Joint Status Report to June 28, 2024 filed by Sensormatic Electronics, LLC. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 6/12/24. (jaa) (Entered: 06/12/2024) | |
| 06/10/24 | STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME [See Stipulation for Details] re 282 Oral Order, 287 Joint Status Report and 292 Joint Status Report to June 28, 2024 - filed by Sensormatic Electronics, LLC. (Gaza, Anne) (Entered: 06/10/2024) | |
| 06/10/24 | STATUS REPORT re 282 Oral Order and 287 Joint Status Report by Sensormatic Electronics, LLC. (Gaza, Anne) (Entered: 06/10/2024) | |
| 06/07/24 | Document Unsealed re: 276 Memorandum Order. (lnb) (Entered: 06/07/2024) | |
| 06/06/24 | Letter to The Honorable Gregory B. Williams from Anne Shea Gaza regarding No Requested Redactions to the Memorandum Order - re 276 Memorandum and Order,. (Gaza, Anne) (Entered: 06/06/2024) | |
| 05/30/24 | Clerk's Taxation of Costs in amount of $ 55,225.23 against Sensormatic Electronics, LLC. Request for Costs 273 is GRANTED in favor of Genetec (USA) Inc. and Genetec, Inc.. (dmp, ) (Entered: 05/30/2024) | |
| 05/23/24 | ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall file a proposed redacted version of any opinions the Court has issued under seal, along with a motion supported by a declaration that contains a clear, factually detailed explanation as to why disclosure of any proposed redacted material would "work a clearly defined and serious injury to the party seeking closure." See In re Avandia Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig., 924 F.3d 662, 672 (3d Cr. 2019) (internal quotations omitted). If the parties do not file a proposed redacted version and corresponding motion by the deadline, or if the court determines the motion lacks a meritorious basis, the opinion[s] will be unsealed in whole or in part. Ordered by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 5/22/2024. (lnb) (Entered: 05/23/2024) |