Geomatrix Systems LLC

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases1

Patents--

CourtsD. Connecticut

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
07/16/24	Geomatrix Systems LLC v. Eljen Corp 3:20-CV-01900 ( D. CT )	ORDER granting 194 Motion for Extension of Time. By July 29, 2024, the parties shall file concurrent briefing as to the meaning of the word "interconnected" within the context of the '863 Patent's disputed claims. See ECF No. 193. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 7/16/2024. (Parfenoff, I) (Entered: 07/16/2024)
07/15/24	Geomatrix Systems LLC v. Eljen Corp 3:20-CV-01900 ( D. CT )	Joint MOTION for Extension of Time until July 29, 2024 to Respond to Briefing Order 193 Order,,, by Geomatrix Systems, LLC. (Taggart, Leigh) (Entered: 07/15/2024)
07/12/24	Geomatrix Systems LLC v. Eljen Corp 3:20-CV-01900 ( D. CT )	ORDER. As the Court informed the parties prior to argument on the cross-motions for summary judgment, the Court has identified that the parties continue to dispute the plain and ordinary meaning of certain terms in the '863 Patent, notably the word "interconnected." ECF No. 189. "When the parties raise an actual dispute regarding the proper scope of... claims, the court, not the jury, must resolve that dispute." O2 Micro Int'l Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Tech. Co., 521 F.3d 1351, 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2008). Where "[a] determination that a claim term 'needs no construction' or has the 'plain and ordinary meaning'" is "inadequate" and "does not resolve the parties' dispute[,]" then "claim construction requires the court to determine what claim scope is appropriate in the context of the patents-in-suit." Id. at 1361. While the Court need not construe every claim in a patent, "[w]hen the parties present a fundamental dispute regarding the scope of a claim term, it is the court's duty to resolve it." Id. at 1362.The parties fundamentally dispute the meaning of the word "interconnected" in the context of the '863 Patent. Accordingly, by July 22, 2024, the parties shall file concurrent briefing as to the meaning of the word "interconnected" within the context of the '863 Patent's disputed claims. The parties should primarily refer to the intrinsic record, but may reference the extrinsic record to the extent it is necessary. The briefing shall be no more than 20 pages. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 7/12/2024. (Parfenoff, I) (Entered: 07/12/2024) ORDER. As the Court informed the parties prior to argument on the cross-motions for summary judgment, the Court has identified that the parties continue to dispute the plain and ordinary meaning of certain terms in the '863 Patent, notably the word "interconnected." ECF No. 189. "When the parties raise an actual dispute regarding the proper scope of... claims, the court, not the jury, must resolve that dispute." O2 Micro Int'l Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Tech. Co., 521 F.3d 1351, 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2008). Where "[a] determination that a claim term 'needs no construction' or has the 'plain and ordinary meaning'" is "inadequate" and "does not resolve the parties' dispute[,]" then "claim construction requires the court to determine what claim scope is appropriate in the context of the patents-in-suit." Id. at 1361. While the Court need not construe every claim in a patent, "[w]hen the parties present a fundamental dispute regarding the scope of a claim term, it is the court's duty to resolve it." Id. at 1362.The parties fundamentally dispute the meaning of the word "interconnected" in the context of the '863 Patent. Accordingly, by July 22, 2024, the parties shall file concurrent briefing as to the meaning of the word "interconnected" within the context of the '863 Patent's disputed claims. The parties should primarily refer to the intrinsic record, but may reference the extrinsic record to the extent it is necessary. The briefing shall be no more than 20 pages. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 7/12/2024. (Parfenoff, I) (Entered: 07/12/2024)
06/06/24	Geomatrix Systems LLC v. Eljen Corp 3:20-CV-01900 ( D. CT )	TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings: Type of Hearing: Motion Hearing held on May 9, 2024 before Judge Sarala Nagala. Court Reporter: Denae Hovland. IMPORTANT NOTICE - REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: To remove personal identifier information from the transcript, a party must electronically file a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction with the Clerk's Office within seven (7) calendar days of this date. If no such Notice is filed, the court will assume redaction of personal identifiers is not necessary and the transcript will be made available through PACER without redaction 90 days from today's date. The transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. The policy governing the redaction of personal information is located on the court website at www.ctd.uscourts.gov. Redaction Request due 6/27/2024. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/7/2024. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/4/2024. (Hovland, Denae) (Entered: 06/06/2024) TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings: Type of Hearing: Motion Hearing held on May 9, 2024 before Judge Sarala Nagala. Court Reporter: Denae Hovland. IMPORTANT NOTICE - REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: To remove personal identifier information from the transcript, a party must electronically file a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction with the Clerk's Office within seven (7) calendar days of this date. If no such Notice is filed, the court will assume redaction of personal identifiers is not necessary and the transcript will be made available through PACER without redaction 90 days from today's date. The transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. The policy governing the redaction of personal information is located on the court website at www.ctd.uscourts.gov. Redaction Request due 6/27/2024. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/7/2024. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/4/2024. (Hovland, Denae) (Entered: 06/06/2024)
05/15/24	Geomatrix Systems LLC v. Eljen Corp 3:20-CV-01900 ( D. CT )	Marked Exhibit List from 5/9/24 Motion Hearing.(Bozek, M) (Entered: 05/15/2024)
05/15/24	Geomatrix Systems LLC v. Eljen Corp 3:20-CV-01900 ( D. CT )	Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge Sarala V. Nagala: taking under advisement 167 Motion for Summary Judgment; taking under advisement 169 Motion for Summary Judgment; Motion Hearing held on 5/9/2024 re 167 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Eljen Corporation, 169 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Geomatrix Systems, LLC. Total Time: 3 hours and 41 minutes(Court Reporter Denae Hovland.) (Bozek, M) (Entered: 05/15/2024) Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge Sarala V. Nagala: taking under advisement 167 Motion for Summary Judgment; taking under advisement 169 Motion for Summary Judgment; Motion Hearing held on 5/9/2024 re 167 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Eljen Corporation, 169 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Geomatrix Systems, LLC. Total Time: 3 hours and 41 minutes(Court Reporter Denae Hovland.) (Bozek, M) (Entered: 05/15/2024)
05/07/24	Geomatrix Systems LLC v. Eljen Corp 3:20-CV-01900 ( D. CT )	ORDER. As the parties continue to dispute the plain and ordinary meaning of certain terms in the '863 Patent, including "interconnected," and "area," the Court intends to consider the parties' arguments in their Markman briefing concerning the proper meaning of those terms. See O2 Micro Int'l Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Tech. Co., 521 F.3d 1351, 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2008); Eon Corp. IP Holdings v. Silver Spring Networks, 815 F.3d 1314, 1318-20 (Fed. Cir. 2016). The parties are free to include comments about their Markman arguments at the oral argument on May 9. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 5/7/2024. (Parfenoff, I) (Entered: 05/07/2024) ORDER. As the parties continue to dispute the plain and ordinary meaning of certain terms in the '863 Patent, including "interconnected," and "area," the Court intends to consider the parties' arguments in their Markman briefing concerning the proper meaning of those terms. See O2 Micro Int'l Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Tech. Co., 521 F.3d 1351, 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2008); Eon Corp. IP Holdings v. Silver Spring Networks, 815 F.3d 1314, 1318-20 (Fed. Cir. 2016). The parties are free to include comments about their Markman arguments at the oral argument on May 9. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 5/7/2024. (Parfenoff, I) (Entered: 05/07/2024)
04/29/24	Geomatrix Systems LLC v. Eljen Corp 3:20-CV-01900 ( D. CT )	NOTICE by Geomatrix Systems, LLC re 169 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Notice of Supplemental Authority) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Virtek Vision v. Assembly Guidance, # 2 Exhibit B - Tesla v. Charge Fusion)(Taggart, Leigh) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
03/18/24	Geomatrix Systems LLC v. Eljen Corp 3:20-CV-01900 ( D. CT )	Calendar Entry re: 167 MOTION for Summary Judgment and 169 MOTION for Summary Judgment . THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE. ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE COURTHOUSE MUST PRESENT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION. Motion Hearing set for 5/9/2024 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom One, 450 Main St., Hartford, CT before Judge Sarala V. Nagala. (Bozek, M) (Entered: 03/18/2024)
01/29/24	Geomatrix Systems LLC v. Eljen Corp 3:20-CV-01900 ( D. CT )	REPLY to Response to 167 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Eljen Corporation. (Bradley, Trevor) (Entered: 01/29/2024)