Greentank Technologies Corp

General

Total Cases2

Active Cases1

Patents6

CourtsC.D. California

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

greentanktech.com

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
12/23/24	Shenzhen Smoore Technology Co Ltd v. Greentank Technologies Corp 2:22-CV-07638 ( C.D. CA )	STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Parties have executed a settlement agreement filed by Plaintiff Shenzhen Smoore Technology Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order)(Chandler, Theodore) (Entered: 12/23/2024)
10/22/24	Shenzhen Smoore Technology Co Ltd v. Greentank Technologies Corp 2:22-CV-07638 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES [In Chambers] Order Appointing Special Master by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm) (Entered: 10/22/2024)
10/22/24	Shenzhen Smoore Technology Co Ltd v. Greentank Technologies Corp 2:22-CV-07638 ( C.D. CA )	SPECIAL MASTER AFFIDAVIT filed by Special Master Nancy M Olson. (rolm) (Entered: 10/22/2024)
10/17/24	Shenzhen Smoore Technology Co Ltd v. Greentank Technologies Corp 2:22-CV-07638 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to the Court's Notice of Intent to Appoint Special Master [DOC 46] filed by Plaintiff Shenzhen Smoore Technology Co., Ltd.. (Wang, Chao) (Entered: 10/17/2024)
10/11/24	Shenzhen Smoore Technology Co Ltd v. Greentank Technologies Corp 2:22-CV-07638 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTE ORDER [In Chambers] Order Regarding Local Patent Rules and Scheduling by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Further to the September 27, 2024 Scheduling Conference, the Court APPROVES the parties' joint request to adopt the United Stated District Court for the Northern District of California's Patent Local Rules, except with respect to damages contentions, with the following patent related deadlines set: Serve Infringement Contentions 10/11/2024; Serve Invalidity Contentions 11/25/2024; Claim Construction (Markman) Hearing 4/18/2025. A further schedule will be set at a later date. IT IS SO ORDERED. (bm) (Entered: 10/11/2024) MINUTE ORDER [In Chambers] Order Regarding Local Patent Rules and Scheduling by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Further to the September 27, 2024 Scheduling Conference, the Court APPROVES the parties' joint request to adopt the United Stated District Court for the Northern District of California's Patent Local Rules, except with respect to damages contentions, with the following patent related deadlines set: Serve Infringement Contentions 10/11/2024; Serve Invalidity Contentions 11/25/2024; Claim Construction (Markman) Hearing 4/18/2025. A further schedule will be set at a later date. IT IS SO ORDERED. (bm) (Entered: 10/11/2024)
10/11/24	Shenzhen Smoore Technology Co Ltd v. Greentank Technologies Corp 2:22-CV-07638 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTE ORDER [In Chambers] Order Advising Parties of Intent to Appoint Special Master by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court finds that, the limited expense of an efficient master imposed on the parties is far outweighed by the cost savings to the parties that will result from streamlining future disputes and reducing the need for protracted litigation. The appointment will assist with the expeditious resolution of the case, as opposed to causing any delay. "Before appointing a master, the Court must give the parties notice and an opportunity to be heard." Fed. R. Civ. P. 53(b)(1). Accordingly, in addition to the preliminary views shared at the scheduling conference, the Court shares its detailed views in this Order and provides that, within seven days of receipt of this order, any party may FILE a statement concerning the Court's intention to appoint a special master, not to exceed 3 pages, sharing any views that party wishes the Court to consider. (see document for further details) (bm) (Entered: 10/11/2024) MINUTE ORDER [In Chambers] Order Advising Parties of Intent to Appoint Special Master by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court finds that, the limited expense of an efficient master imposed on the parties is far outweighed by the cost savings to the parties that will result from streamlining future disputes and reducing the need for protracted litigation. The appointment will assist with the expeditious resolution of the case, as opposed to causing any delay. "Before appointing a master, the Court must give the parties notice and an opportunity to be heard." Fed. R. Civ. P. 53(b)(1). Accordingly, in addition to the preliminary views shared at the scheduling conference, the Court shares its detailed views in this Order and provides that, within seven days of receipt of this order, any party may FILE a statement concerning the Court's intention to appoint a special master, not to exceed 3 pages, sharing any views that party wishes the Court to consider. (see document for further details) (bm) (Entered: 10/11/2024)
10/02/24	Shenzhen Smoore Technology Co Ltd v. Greentank Technologies Corp 2:22-CV-07638 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The request to consolidate trials is DENIED, at this time. The Court orders the parties to file, within the next fourteen days a stipulation to stay. The conference is adjourned. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (es) (Entered: 10/02/2024)
09/20/24	Shenzhen Smoore Technology Co Ltd v. Greentank Technologies Corp 2:22-CV-07638 ( C.D. CA )	(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr: The Court has reviewed the Stipulations to Consolidate and the Stipulations to Continue Scheduling Conference and Modify Briefing Schedule filed in the Shenzhen Smoore Technology, Ltd., related cases, Case Nos. 2:22-cv-07646-AB-AGR, 2:22-cv-07638-AB-AGR, and 2:22-cv-08014-AB-AGR.The Court CONTINUES the hearings on Smoores Motions (2:22-cv-07646-AB-AGR Dkt. No. 54, and 2:22-cv-08014-AB-AGR Dkt. No. 49) from October 11, 2024, to November 1, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. Oppositions are due October 3, 2024, and replies are due October 19, 2024.The Scheduling Conference set for September 27, 2024 will remain on calendar. The Court advises the parties that they should be prepared to discuss whether simply coordinating these cases for pretrial purposes makes better sense than formally consolidating them. The Court may wish to discuss other case management issues as well. The Court may defer entering a scheduling order until a later date. Counsel are welcome to appear via Zoom instead of in person if they prefer.SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dta) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 09/20/2024) (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr: The Court has reviewed the Stipulations to Consolidate and the Stipulations to Continue Scheduling Conference and Modify Briefing Schedule filed in the Shenzhen Smoore Technology, Ltd., related cases, Case Nos. 2:22-cv-07646-AB-AGR, 2:22-cv-07638-AB-AGR, and 2:22-cv-08014-AB-AGR.The Court CONTINUES the hearings on Smoores Motions (2:22-cv-07646-AB-AGR Dkt. No. 54, and 2:22-cv-08014-AB-AGR Dkt. No. 49) from October 11, 2024, to November 1, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. Oppositions are due October 3, 2024, and replies are due October 19, 2024.The Scheduling Conference set for September 27, 2024 will remain on calendar. The Court advises the parties that they should be prepared to discuss whether simply coordinating these cases for pretrial purposes makes better sense than formally consolidating them. The Court may wish to discuss other case management issues as well. The Court may defer entering a scheduling order until a later date. Counsel are welcome to appear via Zoom instead of in person if they prefer.SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dta) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 09/20/2024)
09/16/24	Shenzhen Smoore Technology Co Ltd v. Greentank Technologies Corp 2:22-CV-07638 ( C.D. CA )	Joint STIPULATION to Reschedule Scheduling Conference, Modify Briefing Schedule, and Set Contention Deadlines filed by Plaintiff Shenzhen Smoore Technology Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order)(Chandler, Theodore) (Entered: 09/16/2024)
09/13/24	Shenzhen Smoore Technology Co Ltd v. Greentank Technologies Corp 2:22-CV-07638 ( C.D. CA )	JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4-5 days, filed by Plaintiff Shenzhen Smoore Technology Co., Ltd... (Chandler, Theodore) (Entered: 09/13/2024)