Healeon Medical Inc

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsS.D. New York

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

healeonmedical.com

healeon-medical

healeon-medical

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
09/14/20	Regenlab USA LLC v. Estar Tech Ltd 1:16-CV-08771 ( S.D. NY )	AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 9/7/2020 in a court action filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(rj) (Entered: 09/14/2020) AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 9/7/2020 in a court action filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(rj) (Entered: 09/14/2020)
09/14/20	Regenlab USA LLC v. Estar Tech Ltd 1:16-CV-08771 ( S.D. NY )	AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 9/7/2020 in a court action filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(rj) (Entered: 09/14/2020) AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 9/7/2020 in a court action filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(rj) (Entered: 09/14/2020)
09/06/20	Regenlab USA LLC v. Estar Tech Ltd 1:16-CV-08771 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER re: 206 Order to Show Cause,, (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr) (Text Only Order) (Carter, Andrew) This case is dismissed for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. (Entered: 09/06/2020)
09/06/20	Regenlab USA LLC v. Estar Tech Ltd 1:16-CV-08771 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER re: 206 Order to Show Cause,, (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr) (Text Only Order) (Carter, Andrew) This case is dismissed for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. (Entered: 09/06/2020)
07/14/20	Regenlab USA LLC v. Estar Tech Ltd 1:16-CV-08771 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See LeSane v. Hall's Sec. Analyst, Inc., 239 F.3d 206, 209 (2d Cir. 2001) ("[I]t is unquestioned that Rule 41(b) also gives the district court authority to dismiss a plaintiff's case sua sponte for failure to prosecute..."). Such showing should be made by Plaintiffs attorney filing an appearance within 30 days. Any failure by Plaintiff to make this showing will result in a dismissal of this case without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Additionally, the Court's July 1, 2020 order for status report is VACATED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 7/13/2020) (rj) (Entered: 07/14/2020) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See LeSane v. Hall's Sec. Analyst, Inc., 239 F.3d 206, 209 (2d Cir. 2001) ("[I]t is unquestioned that Rule 41(b) also gives the district court authority to dismiss a plaintiff's case sua sponte for failure to prosecute..."). Such showing should be made by Plaintiffs attorney filing an appearance within 30 days. Any failure by Plaintiff to make this showing will result in a dismissal of this case without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Additionally, the Court's July 1, 2020 order for status report is VACATED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 7/13/2020) (rj) (Entered: 07/14/2020)
07/14/20	Regenlab USA LLC v. Estar Tech Ltd 1:16-CV-08771 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See LeSane v. Hall's Sec. Analyst, Inc., 239 F.3d 206, 209 (2d Cir. 2001) ("[I]t is unquestioned that Rule 41(b) also gives the district court authority to dismiss a plaintiff's case sua sponte for failure to prosecute..."). Such showing should be made by Plaintiffs attorney filing an appearance within 30 days. Any failure by Plaintiff to make this showing will result in a dismissal of this case without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Additionally, the Court's July 1, 2020 order for status report is VACATED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 7/13/2020) (rj) (Entered: 07/14/2020) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See LeSane v. Hall's Sec. Analyst, Inc., 239 F.3d 206, 209 (2d Cir. 2001) ("[I]t is unquestioned that Rule 41(b) also gives the district court authority to dismiss a plaintiff's case sua sponte for failure to prosecute..."). Such showing should be made by Plaintiffs attorney filing an appearance within 30 days. Any failure by Plaintiff to make this showing will result in a dismissal of this case without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Additionally, the Court's July 1, 2020 order for status report is VACATED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 7/13/2020) (rj) (Entered: 07/14/2020)
07/02/20	Regenlab USA LLC v. Estar Tech Ltd 1:16-CV-08771 ( S.D. NY )	LETTER addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from Daniel J. Melman dated July 2, 2020 re: Guidance on Submission of Joint Status Report. Document filed by Eclipse MedCorp, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1).(Melman, Daniel) (Entered: 07/02/2020)
07/02/20	Regenlab USA LLC v. Estar Tech Ltd 1:16-CV-08771 ( S.D. NY )	LETTER addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from Daniel J. Melman dated July 2, 2020 re: Guidance on Submission of Joint Status Report. Document filed by Eclipse MedCorp, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1).(Melman, Daniel) (Entered: 07/02/2020)
07/01/20	Regenlab USA LLC v. Estar Tech Ltd 1:16-CV-08771 ( S.D. NY )	Vacated as per Judge's Order dated 7/13/2020, Doc. # 206 ORDER: The parties should submit a joint status report by July 15, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 7/1/2020) (kv) Modified on 7/14/2020 (rj). (Entered: 07/01/2020)
07/01/20	Regenlab USA LLC v. Estar Tech Ltd 1:16-CV-08771 ( S.D. NY )	Vacated as per Judge's Order dated 7/13/2020, Doc. # 206 ORDER: The parties should submit a joint status report by July 15, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 7/1/2020) (kv) Modified on 7/14/2020 (rj). (Entered: 07/01/2020)