Hon Kathy Hochul

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases1

Patents--

CourtsN.D. New York

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
11/27/24	Weissbrod Gurvey v. Hochul 1:24-CV-00211 ( N.D. NY )	TEXT ORDER granting Plaintiff's [47] Pro Se Motion for Permission to File Electronically in ECF : The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's [47] request for permission to electronically file documents via CM/ECF. Since Plaintiff has filed a certification as directed showing that Plaintiff is in compliance with the Court's requirements, permission is granted for Plaintiff to participate in electronic case filing in this case only. Plaintiff is authorized to conduct N.D.N.Y. CM/ECF filing via a PACER account in ONLY this case. Plaintiff must not permit anyone else to utilize their PACER account. Plaintiff must comply with all N.D.N.Y. Local Rules, all Federal Rules, all General Orders of the N.D.N.Y., and all Court Orders, directives, and practices. Plaintiff must comply with all directives issued by the Clerk of Court to Plaintiff in connection with any filing on CM/ECF as to which the Clerks Office contacts Plaintiff. Plaintiff is advised and cautioned that any violation of any condition or any abuse otherwise of participation in electronic case filing will result in the immediate revocation of plaintiff participating in electronic case filing. Additionally, the court may revoke these electronic filing privileges if it determines in its sole discretion that plaintiff's use of the system is not satisfactory. The clerk will contact the pro se litigant via email with further instructions to complete the registration process. SO ORDERED. Authorized by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 11/27/2024. (Copy served via regular mail on 11/27/24)(tab) (Entered: 11/27/2024) TEXT ORDER granting Plaintiff's [47] Pro Se Motion for Permission to File Electronically in ECF : The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's [47] request for permission to electronically file documents via CM/ECF. Since Plaintiff has filed a certification as directed showing that Plaintiff is in compliance with the Court's requirements, permission is granted for Plaintiff to participate in electronic case filing in this case only. Plaintiff is authorized to conduct N.D.N.Y. CM/ECF filing via a PACER account in ONLY this case. Plaintiff must not permit anyone else to utilize their PACER account. Plaintiff must comply with all N.D.N.Y. Local Rules, all Federal Rules, all General Orders of the N.D.N.Y., and all Court Orders, directives, and practices. Plaintiff must comply with all directives issued by the Clerk of Court to Plaintiff in connection with any filing on CM/ECF as to which the Clerks Office contacts Plaintiff. Plaintiff is advised and cautioned that any violation of any condition or any abuse otherwise of participation in electronic case filing will result in the immediate revocation of plaintiff participating in electronic case filing. Additionally, the court may revoke these electronic filing privileges if it determines in its sole discretion that plaintiff's use of the system is not satisfactory. The clerk will contact the pro se litigant via email with further instructions to complete the registration process. SO ORDERED. Authorized by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 11/27/2024. (Copy served via regular mail on 11/27/24)(tab) (Entered: 11/27/2024)
11/27/24	Weissbrod Gurvey v. Hochul 1:24-CV-00211 ( N.D. NY )	TEXT ORDER: On August 21, 2024, plaintiff filed a letter motion (Dkt. No. 44) seeking, among other things, a 30-day extension of time to respond in opposition to dkt. nos. 38 and 39, to seek her own counsel, and for ECF e-filing privileges. To the extent plaintiff seeks the extension of time to respond to dkt. nos 38, 39 and file her cross-motions, and seek to retain her own counsel, the extension request is DISMISSED as moot, as plaintiff has filed her opposition and cross motions at docket number 48, and, in light of special solicitude, the Court will deem it timely, and plaintiff has been afforded time to seek to retain counsel on her own. To the extent plaintiff seeks e-filing privileges, dkt. no. 44 and in dkt. no. 47, that request is GRANTED and will be memorialized in an Order to follow. The Court will address plaintiffs motion, to the extent it seeks the appointment of pro bono counsel, in a separate order. So Ordered. Authorized by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 11/27/2024. (Copy served via regular mail on 11/27/2024)(tab) (Entered: 11/27/2024) TEXT ORDER: On August 21, 2024, plaintiff filed a letter motion (Dkt. No. 44) seeking, among other things, a 30-day extension of time to respond in opposition to dkt. nos. 38 and 39, to seek her own counsel, and for ECF e-filing privileges. To the extent plaintiff seeks the extension of time to respond to dkt. nos 38, 39 and file her cross-motions, and seek to retain her own counsel, the extension request is DISMISSED as moot, as plaintiff has filed her opposition and cross motions at docket number 48, and, in light of special solicitude, the Court will deem it timely, and plaintiff has been afforded time to seek to retain counsel on her own. To the extent plaintiff seeks e-filing privileges, dkt. no. 44 and in dkt. no. 47, that request is GRANTED and will be memorialized in an Order to follow. The Court will address plaintiffs motion, to the extent it seeks the appointment of pro bono counsel, in a separate order. So Ordered. Authorized by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 11/27/2024. (Copy served via regular mail on 11/27/2024)(tab) (Entered: 11/27/2024)
11/26/24	Weissbrod Gurvey v. Hochul 1:24-CV-00211 ( N.D. NY )	DECISION & ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED, that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel, Dkt. No. [44] , is DENIED without prejudice to renew should this matter survive dispositive motion practice and be calendared as trial ready. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on November 26, 2024. (Copy served via regular mail)(ztc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/27/2024: # [1] Unpublished Cases, # [2] Unpublished Cases 2) (ztc, ). (Entered: 11/26/2024) DECISION & ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED, that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel, Dkt. No. [44] , is DENIED without prejudice to renew should this matter survive dispositive motion practice and be calendared as trial ready. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on November 26, 2024. (Copy served via regular mail)(ztc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/27/2024: # [1] Unpublished Cases, # [2] Unpublished Cases 2) (ztc, ). (Entered: 11/26/2024)
10/11/24	Weissbrod Gurvey v. Hochul 1:24-CV-00211 ( N.D. NY )	STATUS REPORT notifying Court of plaintiff's failure to serve Chief Judge Swain by Laura Taylor Swain. (Folster Lesperance, Karen) (Entered: 10/11/2024)
09/30/24	Weissbrod Gurvey v. Hochul 1:24-CV-00211 ( N.D. NY )	CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Kevin O'Toole re [52] Reply to Response to Motion (Hodgkinson, Brian) (Entered: 09/30/2024)
09/30/24	Weissbrod Gurvey v. Hochul 1:24-CV-00211 ( N.D. NY )	REPLY to Response to Motion re [39] Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, filed by Kevin O'Toole. (Attachments: # [1] Unreported Cases, # [2] Proof of Service)(Hodgkinson, Brian) (Entered: 09/30/2024)
09/30/24	Weissbrod Gurvey v. Hochul 1:24-CV-00211 ( N.D. NY )	CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Frank Hoare, Kathy Hochul, Letitia James, Brian O'Dwyer, State of New York, Joseph A. Zayas re [50] Memorandum of Law,, (Engelhart, Noah) (Entered: 09/30/2024)
09/27/24	Weissbrod Gurvey v. Hochul 1:24-CV-00211 ( N.D. NY )	MEMORANDUM OF LAW re [48] Motion to Amend/Correct, [38] Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,,,,, Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction,,,, State Defendants' Reply on motion to dismiss and Opposition to Plaintiff's motion to amend and for other various relief filed by Frank Hoare, Kathy Hochul, Letitia James, Brian O'Dwyer, State of New York, Joseph A. Zayas. (Attachments: # [1] Appendix Supplemental Appendix of Unreported Cases)(Engelhart, Noah) (Entered: 09/27/2024) MEMORANDUM OF LAW re [48] Motion to Amend/Correct, [38] Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,,,,, Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction,,,, State Defendants' Reply on motion to dismiss and Opposition to Plaintiff's motion to amend and for other various relief filed by Frank Hoare, Kathy Hochul, Letitia James, Brian O'Dwyer, State of New York, Joseph A. Zayas. (Attachments: # [1] Appendix Supplemental Appendix of Unreported Cases)(Engelhart, Noah) (Entered: 09/27/2024)
09/25/24	Weissbrod Gurvey v. Hochul 1:24-CV-00211 ( N.D. NY )	ADDENDUM to [48] RESPONSE in Opposition and CROSS MOTION filed by Plaintiff Amy R. Weissbrod Gurvey. {Filed via MFT on September 25, 2024} (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit)(ztc) (Entered: 09/25/2024)
09/24/24	Weissbrod Gurvey v. Hochul 1:24-CV-00211 ( N.D. NY )	RESPONSE in Opposition re [38] Motion to Dismiss and [39] Motion to Dismiss and CROSS MOTION to Amend Complaint and to Disqualify the Attorney General from Appearing for State Defendants filed by Amy R. Weissbrod Gurvey. {Filed via MFT on September 23, 2024} (ztc) (Entered: 09/24/2024)