Innolux Corp

General

Total Cases25
Active Cases4
Patents3,558
TypeOperating Company
Elite Ratings
--

Ratings

Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
L3
C
PTAB
L2
C
CAFC
L2
D

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
10/21/24
DOCKET CONTROL ORDER re [30] JOINT MOTION for Entry of Proposed Docket Control Order filed by Phenix Longhorn, LLC., ( Pretrial Conference set for 1/13/2026 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne., Jury Selection set for 2/17/2026 at 09:00AM before District Judge Robert W. Schroeder III., Markman Hearing set for 8/7/2025 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne.) (Motion(s) [30] terminated). Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 10/21/2024. (NKL) (Entered: 10/21/2024)
10/17/24
JOINT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Proposed Protective Order and Comply with Paragraphs 1 & 3 of the Discovery Order (Initial and Additional Disclosures) by Phenix Longhorn, LLC. (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order)(Findlay, Eric) (Entered: 10/17/2024)
10/16/24
UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Innolux Corporation. (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order)(Thompson, Gregory) (Entered: 10/16/2024)
10/11/24
JOINT MOTION for Entry of Proposed Discovery Order by Phenix Longhorn, LLC. (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order (Proposed Discovery Order))(Findlay, Eric) (Entered: 10/11/2024)
10/11/24
JOINT MOTION for Entry of Proposed Docket Control Order by Phenix Longhorn, LLC. (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order (Proposed Docket Control Order))(Findlay, Eric) (Entered: 10/11/2024)
10/04/24
NOTICE Plaintiff Phenix Longhorn LLC's Notice of Filing Regarding Amended Complaint in Response to Defendant Innolux Corporation's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. 23) by Phenix Longhorn, LLC re [28] Amended Complaint, (Findlay, Eric) (Entered: 10/04/2024)
10/04/24
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Innolux Corporation, Does 1-10, filed by Phenix Longhorn, LLC. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit A - U.S. Patent No. 7,233,305, # [2] Exhibit B - U.S. Patent No. 7,557,788, # [3] Exhibit C, # [4] Exhibit D, # [5] Exhibit E, # [6] Exhibit F, # [7] Exhibit G, # [8] Exhibit H, # [9] Exhibit I, # [10] Exhibit J, # [11] Exhibit K, # [12] Exhibit L)(Findlay, Eric) (Entered: 10/04/2024)
09/27/24
ORDER finding as moot [10] Motion for Alternative Service, in view of Dkt. 19. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 09/27/2024 (no document attached) (Payne, Roy) (Entered: 09/27/2024)
09/27/24
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Roy Payne: Scheduling Conference held on 9/27/24. Counsel for the parties appeared and were asked if they consented to a trial before the magistrate judge. The parties were then given Markman and jury selection dates. The parties were directed to meet and confer regarding any changes to the Courts proposed docket control order and discovery order, and the parties are to submit the proposed orders within fourteen days. The deadlines in the original notice setting scheduling conference will run from today, instead of the original date set. Attorney Appearances: Plaintiff - Eric Findlay; Defense - Blake Thompson. (No exhibits)(Court Reporter Not Recorded.) (bga) (Entered: 09/27/2024)
09/24/24
ORDER granting [24] UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to [23] MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Responses due by 10/10/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 9/24/2024. (NKL) (Entered: 09/24/2024)