Inteliquent, Inc.

General

Total Cases4
Active Cases--
Patents3
TypeOperating Company
Elite Ratings
--

Ratings

Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
03/09/23
FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order 46 in the amount of the Judgment Amount as to certain defendant (Christensen, Jake) (Entered: 03/09/2023)
12/22/22
FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order 46 in the amount of the Judgment Amount as to certain defendant (Christensen, Jake) (Entered: 12/22/2022)
10/03/22
Report on the Determination [Closing] of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120). (Attachments: # 1 Order)(W,Na) (Entered: 10/03/2022)
09/07/22
Marginal Order of Case Dismissal. Judge Charles Esque Fleming on 9/7/2022. Related document 8 . (S,SR) (Entered: 09/07/2022)
09/07/22
Notice of Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1) with Prejudice filed by Coretek Licensing LLC. (Curfman, Andrew) (Entered: 09/07/2022)
08/19/22
Motion to stay All Deadlines and Notice of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Coretek Licensing LLC. (Curfman, Andrew) (Entered: 08/19/2022)
08/19/22
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion to stay. Notice of Dismissal shall be filed on or before October 17, 2022 (Related Doc # 7 ). Judge Charles Esque Fleming on 8/19/2022. (S,SR) Modified on 8/19/2022 (S,SR). (Entered: 08/19/2022)
08/19/22
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion to stay. Notice of Dismissal shall be filed on or before October 17, 2022 (Related Doc # 7 ). Judge Charles Esque Fleming on 8/19/2022. (S,SR) Modified on 8/19/2022 (S,SR). (Entered: 08/19/2022)
08/15/22
Report on the Determination [Closing] of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120). (Attachments: # 1 Transfer Order)(W,Na) (Entered: 08/15/2022)
08/03/22
Order: [non-document] Before the Court is Plaintiff's 6 motion for extension of time until September 14, 2022 for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. While the motion indicates it is unopposed, the record in this case does not indicate any appearance of counsel on behalf of Defendant. Given the unusual nature of the motion (Plaintiff making the request on behalf of the Defendant), especially in light of Defendant's lack of counsel, the motion is DENIED. The Court will allow Defendant an additional week (until August 22, 2022) to obtain counsel and file an answer/response to the complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Judge Charles Esque Fleming on 8/3/2022. (S,SR) (Entered: 08/03/2022)