Intermec Inc

General

Total Cases9

Active Cases--

Patents72

CourtsD. Delaware E.D. Texas N.D. Illinois

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

intermec-technologies

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

L4

C

PTAB

L5

A

CAFC

L4

D

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
07/09/24	Hand Held Products Inc v. Transcore LP 1:23-CV-00686 ( D. DE )	Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 8,919,654; US 8,141,784; US 7,710,798; US 10,452,968 ; US 6,259,408; US 6,369,711 ; US 6,286,762 ; US 6,318,636. (Attachments: # 1 Stipulation of Dismissal)(as) (Entered: 07/09/2024)
07/08/24	Hand Held Products Inc v. Transcore LP 1:23-CV-00686 ( D. DE )	SO ORDERED re 24 Stipulation of Dismissal ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 7/8/2024. (dlw) (Entered: 07/08/2024)
07/05/24	Hand Held Products Inc v. Transcore LP 1:23-CV-00686 ( D. DE )	STIPULATION of Dismissal by TransCore Holdings, Inc., TransCore, LP. (Farnan, Kelly) (Entered: 07/05/2024)
06/27/24	Hand Held Products Inc v. Transcore LP 1:23-CV-00686 ( D. DE )	ORAL ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall confer regarding proposed dates in the scheduling order and shall submit a proposed order, which is also consistent with the following guidance. The parties shall provide final contentions (i.e., final infringement and invalidity contentions, as well as final non-infringement and validity contentions) around the time that fact discovery closes (i.e., several weeks prior to or after the deadline to complete fact discovery) and at least three weeks before Plaintiffs serves their opening claim construction brief. Final contentions shall include a party's contentions under its proposed construction(s), as well as under the opposing construction(s) (if such an alternative contention exists). As such, the parties are encouraged to exchange proposed claim terms and proposed constructions early in the case but in no event later than necessary to allow the parties to include alternative contentions in their final contentions. The joint claim construction chart shall be due one week after the parties have completed their exchange of final contentions, and the joint claim construction brief must be filed at least three weeks before the claim construction hearing. The parties shall leave at least three weeks between the claim construction hearing and the opening of expert discovery. The parties are to use the Court's form scheduling order, which is posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see Chambers, Judge Noreika, Forms), and the parties must include a proposal for the length and timing of trial. If there are disputes or issues that the Court needs to address in the proposed scheduling order, the parties shall direct the Court to the paragraph numbers in which those appear in a cover letter to the Court. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/27/2024. (dlw) (Entered: 06/27/2024) ORAL ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall confer regarding proposed dates in the scheduling order and shall submit a proposed order, which is also consistent with the following guidance. The parties shall provide final contentions (i.e., final infringement and invalidity contentions, as well as final non-infringement and validity contentions) around the time that fact discovery closes (i.e., several weeks prior to or after the deadline to complete fact discovery) and at least three weeks before Plaintiffs serves their opening claim construction brief. Final contentions shall include a party's contentions under its proposed construction(s), as well as under the opposing construction(s) (if such an alternative contention exists). As such, the parties are encouraged to exchange proposed claim terms and proposed constructions early in the case but in no event later than necessary to allow the parties to include alternative contentions in their final contentions. The joint claim construction chart shall be due one week after the parties have completed their exchange of final contentions, and the joint claim construction brief must be filed at least three weeks before the claim construction hearing. The parties shall leave at least three weeks between the claim construction hearing and the opening of expert discovery. The parties are to use the Court's form scheduling order, which is posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see Chambers, Judge Noreika, Forms), and the parties must include a proposal for the length and timing of trial. If there are disputes or issues that the Court needs to address in the proposed scheduling order, the parties shall direct the Court to the paragraph numbers in which those appear in a cover letter to the Court. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/27/2024. (dlw) (Entered: 06/27/2024)
05/31/24	Hand Held Products Inc v. Transcore LP 1:23-CV-00686 ( D. DE )	The following PTAB cases were filed: Patent US10452968 in IPR2024-00982
02/06/24	Hand Held Products Inc v. Transcore LP 1:23-CV-00686 ( D. DE )	REPLY to Response to Motion re 18 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-reply in Opposition to Transcore's Partial Motion to Dismiss filed by Hand Held Products, Inc., Intermec IP Corp., Intermec Technologies Corporation, Intermec, Inc. (Silverstein, Alan) Modified on 2/6/2024 (dlw). (Entered: 02/06/2024)
02/05/24	Voxware Inc v. Honeywell Intl Inc 1:23-CV-00052 ( D. DE )	CORRECTING ENTRY: The main document at D.I. 79 has been replaced with a corrected version, NEF regenerated. (vfm) (Entered: 02/05/2024)
01/30/24	Hand Held Products Inc v. Transcore LP 1:23-CV-00686 ( D. DE )	RESPONSE to Motion re 18 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-reply in Opposition to Transcore's Partial Motion to Dismiss filed by TransCore Holdings, Inc., TransCore, LP. (Farnan, Kelly) Modified on 1/30/2024 (dlw). (Entered: 01/30/2024)
01/30/24	Voxware Inc v. Honeywell Intl Inc 1:23-CV-00052 ( D. DE )	Final Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,609,669; 7,885,419; 8,255,219; 8,914,290; 10,909,490. (vfm) (Main Document 79 replaced on 2/5/2024) (vfm). (Entered: 01/30/2024)
01/26/24	Voxware Inc v. Honeywell Intl Inc 1:23-CV-00052 ( D. DE )	ORDER, that this case is dismissed with prejudice; and it is further ORDERED that each Party shall bear its own fees and costs (copy to pltf) (CASE CLOSED). Signed by Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves on 01/26/2024. (vfm) (Entered: 01/26/2024)