Invitae Corp

General

Total Cases14

Active Cases4

Patents36

CourtsN.D. California D. Delaware D. Utah

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

invitae-corporation

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
08/29/24	Invitae Corp v. Natera Inc 1:21-CV-00669 ( D. DE )	NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Yi Zhang as co-counsel.. (Farnan, Brian) (Entered: 08/29/2024)
08/29/24	Invitae Corp v. Natera Inc 1:21-CV-01635 ( D. DE )	NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Yi Zhang as co-counsel.. (Farnan, Brian) (Entered: 08/29/2024)
06/17/24	Invitae Corp v. Natera Inc 1:21-CV-00669 ( D. DE )	ORAL ORDER: When the Court issued its opinion at D.I. 268 in 21-669 and D.I. 244 in 21-1635, it ordered the parties to file proposed redactions by November 23, 2023. The parties did not do so. On May 23, the Court ordered the parties to, within fourteen (14) days, "file a proposed redacted version of any opinions the Court has issued under seal, along with a motion supported by a declaration." D.I. 287 in 21-669. The Court stated that failure to do so would result in any sealed opinions being unsealed in whole or in part. The parties have not filed any proposed redactions. Thus, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's opinion located at D.I. 268 in 21-669 and D.I. 244 in 21-1635 is UNSEALED. Ordered by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 6/17/2024. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00669-GBW, 1:21-cv-01635-GBW(lnb) (Entered: 06/17/2024) ORAL ORDER: When the Court issued its opinion at D.I. 268 in 21-669 and D.I. 244 in 21-1635, it ordered the parties to file proposed redactions by November 23, 2023. The parties did not do so. On May 23, the Court ordered the parties to, within fourteen (14) days, "file a proposed redacted version of any opinions the Court has issued under seal, along with a motion supported by a declaration." D.I. 287 in 21-669. The Court stated that failure to do so would result in any sealed opinions being unsealed in whole or in part. The parties have not filed any proposed redactions. Thus, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's opinion located at D.I. 268 in 21-669 and D.I. 244 in 21-1635 is UNSEALED. Ordered by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 6/17/2024. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00669-GBW, 1:21-cv-01635-GBW(lnb) (Entered: 06/17/2024)
06/17/24	Invitae Corp v. Natera Inc 1:21-CV-01635 ( D. DE )	ORAL ORDER: When the Court issued its opinion at D.I. 268 in 21-669 and D.I. 244 in 21-1635, it ordered the parties to file proposed redactions by November 23, 2023. The parties did not do so. On May 23, the Court ordered the parties to, within fourteen (14) days, "file a proposed redacted version of any opinions the Court has issued under seal, along with a motion supported by a declaration." D.I. 287 in 21-669. The Court stated that failure to do so would result in any sealed opinions being unsealed in whole or in part. The parties have not filed any proposed redactions. Thus, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's opinion located at D.I. 268 in 21-669 and D.I. 244 in 21-1635 is UNSEALED. Ordered by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 6/17/2024. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00669-GBW, 1:21-cv-01635-GBW(lnb) (Entered: 06/17/2024) ORAL ORDER: When the Court issued its opinion at D.I. 268 in 21-669 and D.I. 244 in 21-1635, it ordered the parties to file proposed redactions by November 23, 2023. The parties did not do so. On May 23, the Court ordered the parties to, within fourteen (14) days, "file a proposed redacted version of any opinions the Court has issued under seal, along with a motion supported by a declaration." D.I. 287 in 21-669. The Court stated that failure to do so would result in any sealed opinions being unsealed in whole or in part. The parties have not filed any proposed redactions. Thus, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's opinion located at D.I. 268 in 21-669 and D.I. 244 in 21-1635 is UNSEALED. Ordered by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 6/17/2024. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00669-GBW, 1:21-cv-01635-GBW(lnb) (Entered: 06/17/2024)
06/17/24	Invitae Corp v. Natera Inc 1:21-CV-01635 ( D. DE )	Document Unsealed (244 in 1:21-cv-01635-GBW, 268 in 1:21-cv-00669-GBW) Memorandum Order. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00669-GBW, 1:21-cv-01635-GBW(lnb) (Entered: 06/17/2024)
06/17/24	Invitae Corp v. Natera Inc 1:21-CV-00669 ( D. DE )	Document Unsealed (244 in 1:21-cv-01635-GBW, 268 in 1:21-cv-00669-GBW) Memorandum Order. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00669-GBW, 1:21-cv-01635-GBW(lnb) (Entered: 06/17/2024)
05/23/24	Invitae Corp v. Natera Inc 1:21-CV-00669 ( D. DE )	ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall file a proposed redacted version of any opinions the Court has issued under seal, along with a motion supported by a declaration that contains a clear, factually detailed explanation as to why disclosure of any proposed redacted material would "work a clearly defined and serious injury to the party seeking closure." See In re Avandia Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig., 924 F.3d 662, 672 (3d Cr. 2019) (internal quotations omitted). If the parties do not file a proposed redacted version and corresponding motion by the deadline, or if the court determines the motion lacks a meritorious basis, the opinion[s] will be unsealed in whole or in part. Ordered by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 5/22/2024. (lnb) (Entered: 05/23/2024) ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall file a proposed redacted version of any opinions the Court has issued under seal, along with a motion supported by a declaration that contains a clear, factually detailed explanation as to why disclosure of any proposed redacted material would "work a clearly defined and serious injury to the party seeking closure." See In re Avandia Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig., 924 F.3d 662, 672 (3d Cr. 2019) (internal quotations omitted). If the parties do not file a proposed redacted version and corresponding motion by the deadline, or if the court determines the motion lacks a meritorious basis, the opinion[s] will be unsealed in whole or in part. Ordered by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 5/22/2024. (lnb) (Entered: 05/23/2024)
05/23/24	Invitae Corp v. Natera Inc 1:21-CV-01635 ( D. DE )	ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall file a proposed redacted version of any opinions the Court has issued under seal, along with a motion supported by a declaration that contains a clear, factually detailed explanation as to why disclosure of any proposed redacted material would "work a clearly defined and serious injury to the party seeking closure." See In re Avandia Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig., 924 F.3d 662, 672 (3d Cr. 2019) (internal quotations omitted). If the parties do not file a proposed redacted version and corresponding motion by the deadline, or if the court determines the motion lacks a meritorious basis, the opinion[s] will be unsealed in whole or in part. Ordered by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 5/22/2024. (lnb) (Entered: 05/23/2024) ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall file a proposed redacted version of any opinions the Court has issued under seal, along with a motion supported by a declaration that contains a clear, factually detailed explanation as to why disclosure of any proposed redacted material would "work a clearly defined and serious injury to the party seeking closure." See In re Avandia Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig., 924 F.3d 662, 672 (3d Cr. 2019) (internal quotations omitted). If the parties do not file a proposed redacted version and corresponding motion by the deadline, or if the court determines the motion lacks a meritorious basis, the opinion[s] will be unsealed in whole or in part. Ordered by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 5/22/2024. (lnb) (Entered: 05/23/2024)
05/09/24	Tecan Genomics Inc v. Invitae Corp 1:23-CV-01114 ( D. DE )	ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, not later than twenty (21) days from the date of this Order, the parties (with the exception of the Invitae Defendants to which these proceedings are stayed) shall meet and confer and file a joint proposed Scheduling Order in this action consistent with the applicable form Scheduling Order of Judge Williams, which is posted at http://www/ded/uscourts.gov (See Chambers, Judge Williams, Forms), along with a cover letter requesting the Court to enter the joint proposed Scheduling Order (if there are no disputes or other issues concerning scheduling that the Court needs to address) or to schedule the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference. If there are disputes or other issues the Court needs to address in the joint proposed Scheduling Order, in the cover letter, the parties shall direct the Court to the paragraph numbers in the joint proposed Scheduling Order which those appear. ORDERED by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 5/9/2024. (lnb) Modified on 5/9/2024 (lnb). (Entered: 05/09/2024) ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, not later than twenty (21) days from the date of this Order, the parties (with the exception of the Invitae Defendants to which these proceedings are stayed) shall meet and confer and file a joint proposed Scheduling Order in this action consistent with the applicable form Scheduling Order of Judge Williams, which is posted at http://www/ded/uscourts.gov (See Chambers, Judge Williams, Forms), along with a cover letter requesting the Court to enter the joint proposed Scheduling Order (if there are no disputes or other issues concerning scheduling that the Court needs to address) or to schedule the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference. If there are disputes or other issues the Court needs to address in the joint proposed Scheduling Order, in the cover letter, the parties shall direct the Court to the paragraph numbers in the joint proposed Scheduling Order which those appear. ORDERED by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 5/9/2024. (lnb) Modified on 5/9/2024 (lnb). (Entered: 05/09/2024)
05/08/24	Tecan Genomics Inc v. Invitae Corp 1:23-CV-01114 ( D. DE )	Letter to The Honorable Gregory B. Williams from Jeremy A. Tigan regarding request for a Rule 26(f) conference and a Rule 16 scheduling conference. (Tigan, Jeremy) (Entered: 05/08/2024)