Iot Innovations LLC

General

Total Cases25

Active Cases11

Patents45

CourtsE.D. Texas D. Massachusetts S.D. Florida

TypeNPE

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
01/15/25	Iot Innovations LLC v. Fibar Group SA 2:25-CV-00033 ( E.D. TX )	SUMMONS Issued as to Fibar Group S.A., Nice S.p.A.. (Attachments: # [1] Additional Attachment(s))(NKL) (Entered: 01/15/2025)
01/15/25	Iot Innovations LLC v. Fibar Group SA 2:25-CV-00033 ( E.D. TX )	NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kenneth Andrew Matuszewski on behalf of IOT Innovations LLC (Matuszewski, Kenneth) (Entered: 01/15/2025)
01/15/25	Iot Innovations LLC v. Fibar Group SA 2:25-CV-00033 ( E.D. TX )	NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by James Francis McDonough, III on behalf of IOT Innovations LLC (McDonough, James) (Entered: 01/15/2025)
01/15/25	Iot Innovations LLC v. Fibar Group SA 2:25-CV-00033 ( E.D. TX )	NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan Lloyd Hardt on behalf of IOT Innovations LLC (Hardt, Jonathan) (Entered: 01/15/2025)
01/15/25	Iot Innovations LLC v. Fibar Group SA 2:25-CV-00033 ( E.D. TX )	Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rozier, Carey) (Entered: 01/15/2025)
01/15/25	Iot Innovations LLC v. Fibar Group SA 2:25-CV-00033 ( E.D. TX )	Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by IOT Innovations LLC (Rozier, Carey) (Entered: 01/15/2025)
01/15/25	Iot Innovations LLC v. Fibar Group SA 2:25-CV-00033 ( E.D. TX )	Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (NKL) (Entered: 01/15/2025)
01/15/25	Iot Innovations LLC v. Fibar Group SA 2:25-CV-00033 ( E.D. TX )	In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form [Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge] is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (NKL) (Entered: 01/15/2025) In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form [Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge] is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (NKL) (Entered: 01/15/2025)
01/15/25	Iot Innovations LLC v. Fibar Group SA 2:25-CV-00033 ( E.D. TX )	COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10620007.), filed by IOT Innovations LLC. (Attachments: # [1] Civil Cover Sheet, # [2] Additional Attachment(s) Proposed Summons: Fibar Group S.A., # [3] Additional Attachment(s) Proposed Summons: Nice S.p.A.)(Rozier, Carey) (Entered: 01/15/2025)
12/30/24	Iot Innovations LLC v. Generac Power Systems Inc 2:24-CV-01178 ( E.D. WI )	TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 12/30/2024 re [16] Joint Motion to Stay All Deadlines and Notice of Settlement. The parties indicate that they have reached a settlement in principal "that should resolve the Parties' claims raised in this case" and they request a stay of all deadlines for 30 days to allow them to finalize negotiations and file a stipulated dismissal. Dkt. No. 16 at 1. The court ORDERS that this case is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pending the filing of dismissal documents. Any party may move to reopen the case if necessary. The court further ORDERS that when dismissal documents are filed, the court will convert the closure to the resolution required by the pleading. The court ORDERS that the current case deadlines are VACATED. If the settlement negotiations are not successful and the case is reopened, the court will work with the parties to set any necessary deadlines. Note: there is no document linked to this text only order. (cc: all counsel)(cb) TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 12/30/2024 re [16] Joint Motion to Stay All Deadlines and Notice of Settlement. The parties indicate that they have reached a settlement in principal "that should resolve the Parties' claims raised in this case" and they request a stay of all deadlines for 30 days to allow them to finalize negotiations and file a stipulated dismissal. Dkt. No. 16 at 1. The court ORDERS that this case is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pending the filing of dismissal documents. Any party may move to reopen the case if necessary. The court further ORDERS that when dismissal documents are filed, the court will convert the closure to the resolution required by the pleading. The court ORDERS that the current case deadlines are VACATED. If the settlement negotiations are not successful and the case is reopened, the court will work with the parties to set any necessary deadlines. Note: there is no document linked to this text only order. (cc: all counsel)(cb)