Ivanti Inc

General

Total Cases8

Active Cases--

Patents331

CourtsW.D. Texas D. Colorado D. Delaware

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

DCT

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

L4

B

PTAB

L5

E

CAFC

L3

D

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
05/02/23	Ivanti Inc v. Patch MY LLC 1:22-CV-00643 ( D. CO )	Civil Case Terminated pursuant to the Minute Order 53 filed in this case on 5/2/2023. Text Only Entry. (trvo, ) (Entered: 05/02/2023)
05/02/23	Ivanti Inc v. Patch MY LLC 1:22-CV-00643 ( D. CO )	MINUTE ORDER: This matter is before the Court on the 52 Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice, which is a self-effectuating stipulation of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff's claims were dismissed with prejudice as of the filing of the Stipulation. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this case accordingly. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 05/02/2023. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, ) (Entered: 05/02/2023) MINUTE ORDER: This matter is before the Court on the 52 Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice, which is a self-effectuating stipulation of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff's claims were dismissed with prejudice as of the filing of the Stipulation. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this case accordingly. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 05/02/2023. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, ) (Entered: 05/02/2023)
05/01/23	Ivanti Inc v. Patch MY LLC 1:22-CV-00643 ( D. CO )	STIPULATION of Dismissal of Case With Prejudice by Plaintiff Ivanti, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Bullwinkel, Robert) (Entered: 05/01/2023)
04/21/23	Ivanti Inc v. Patch MY LLC 1:22-CV-00643 ( D. CO )	MINUTE ORDER: Though styled as a response to the Court's Order to Show Cause, Plaintiff's 50 Response is, in essence, a motion seeking reconsideration of a Court order and to amend its pleading. The Response is STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, which require that "[b]efore filing a motion, counsel for the moving party or an unrepresented party shall confer or make reasonable, good faith efforts to confer with any opposing counsel or unrepresented party to resolve any disputed matter. The moving party shall describe in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts to fulfill this duty." D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a). Should Plaintiff seek reconsideration of the Court's order and/or to amend its Complaint, it may file an appropriate motion, after conferring with opposing counsel, on or before 4/28/2023. The Court notes that a motion for reconsideration is appropriate only "when the court has made a mistake not of reasoning but of apprehension" or "if there has been a significant change or development in the law or facts," Rosenthal v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 945 F.Supp. 1412, 1420 (D. Colo. 1996), but "is not appropriate to revisit issues already addressed or advance arguments that could have been raised in prior briefing." Servants of the Paraclete v. Does, 204 F.3d 1005, 1012 (10th Cir. 2000). By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 04/21/2023. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, ) (Entered: 04/21/2023) MINUTE ORDER: Though styled as a response to the Court's Order to Show Cause, Plaintiff's 50 Response is, in essence, a motion seeking reconsideration of a Court order and to amend its pleading. The Response is STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, which require that "[b]efore filing a motion, counsel for the moving party or an unrepresented party shall confer or make reasonable, good faith efforts to confer with any opposing counsel or unrepresented party to resolve any disputed matter. The moving party shall describe in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts to fulfill this duty." D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a). Should Plaintiff seek reconsideration of the Court's order and/or to amend its Complaint, it may file an appropriate motion, after conferring with opposing counsel, on or before 4/28/2023. The Court notes that a motion for reconsideration is appropriate only "when the court has made a mistake not of reasoning but of apprehension" or "if there has been a significant change or development in the law or facts," Rosenthal v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 945 F.Supp. 1412, 1420 (D. Colo. 1996), but "is not appropriate to revisit issues already addressed or advance arguments that could have been raised in prior briefing." Servants of the Paraclete v. Does, 204 F.3d 1005, 1012 (10th Cir. 2000). By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 04/21/2023. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, ) (Entered: 04/21/2023)
04/20/23	Ivanti Inc v. Patch MY LLC 1:22-CV-00643 ( D. CO )	STRICKEN RESPONSE to 47 Order on Motion to Dismiss, to Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff Ivanti, Inc.. (Bullwinkel, Robert) Modified on 4/24/2023 to strike pursuant to 51 Order (trvo, ). (Entered: 04/20/2023)
04/17/23	Ivanti Inc v. Patch MY LLC 1:22-CV-00643 ( D. CO )	MINUTE ORDER: In light of the Court's Order on the Motion to Dismiss 47, IT IS ORDERED that: the Joint Motion for Determination of Claim Construction 45 is DENIED as moot and the Unopposed Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order 46 is DENIED without prejudice. To the extent Plaintiff is able to discharge the Order to Show Cause as set forth in the Order, this Court will re-institute the Joint Motion for Determination of Claim Construction and refer this action to the Honorable S. Kato Crews for further scheduling, by Judge Nina Y. Wang on 4/17/2023. Text Only Entry (ebuch) (Entered: 04/17/2023) MINUTE ORDER: In light of the Court's Order on the Motion to Dismiss 47, IT IS ORDERED that: the Joint Motion for Determination of Claim Construction 45 is DENIED as moot and the Unopposed Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order 46 is DENIED without prejudice. To the extent Plaintiff is able to discharge the Order to Show Cause as set forth in the Order, this Court will re-institute the Joint Motion for Determination of Claim Construction and refer this action to the Honorable S. Kato Crews for further scheduling, by Judge Nina Y. Wang on 4/17/2023. Text Only Entry (ebuch) (Entered: 04/17/2023)
04/13/23	Ivanti Inc v. Patch MY LLC 1:22-CV-00643 ( D. CO )	MEMORANDUM regarding 46 Interim MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify 31 Scheduling Order,, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings,, filed by Patch My PC, LLC. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 4/13/2023. Text Only Entry (nywlc3, ) (Entered: 04/13/2023)
04/13/23	Ivanti Inc v. Patch MY LLC 1:22-CV-00643 ( D. CO )	ORDER granting 18 Defendant Patch My PC, LLC's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff Ivanti, Inc. shall show cause no later than April 20, 2023 as to why this case should not be dismissed in its entirety. The claim construction hearing currently set for April 19, 2023 is vacated, by Judge Nina Y. Wang on 4/13/2023. (ebuch) (Entered: 04/13/2023)
04/13/23	Ivanti Inc v. Patch MY LLC 1:22-CV-00643 ( D. CO )	Interim MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify 31 Scheduling Order,, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings,, by Defendant Patch My PC, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Fletcher, Ryan) (Entered: 04/13/2023)
04/05/23	Attestwave LLC v. Ivanti Inc 6:22-CV-01110 ( W.D. TX )	Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (bot1) (Entered: 04/05/2023)