Jinanyingfengshangmaoxiaoshouyouxianzerengongsi

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsN.D. Illinois

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
12/09/22	Dyson Technology Ltd v. City Daily Makeup Store 1:21-CV-06567 ( N.D. IL )	FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order 56 in the amount of The Judgment Amount as to certain defendant (Christensen, Jake) (Entered: 12/09/2022)
07/15/22	Dyson Technology Ltd v. City Daily Makeup Store 1:21-CV-06567 ( N.D. IL )	FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order 56 in the amount of the Judgment Amount as to certain defendants (Christensen, Jake) (Entered: 07/15/2022)
04/14/22	Dyson Technology Ltd v. City Daily Makeup Store 1:21-CV-06567 ( N.D. IL )	RETURN of U.S. Post Office Receipt, article no. 7019 2280 0000 0962 5919 (exr, ) (Entered: 04/14/2022)
04/04/22	Dyson Technology Ltd v. City Daily Makeup Store 1:21-CV-06567 ( N.D. IL )	FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order 56 in the amount of the Judgment Amount as to certain defendants (Christensen, Jake) (Entered: 04/04/2022)
04/04/22	Dyson Technology Ltd v. City Daily Makeup Store 1:21-CV-06567 ( N.D. IL )	MAILED original ten-thousand-dollar ($10,000) surety bond posted by Dyson Technology Limited to plaintiff's counsel, Justin R. Gaudio, Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd., 300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500, Chicago, IL 60606 via certified mail # 7019 2280 0000 09620 5919. (exr, ) (Entered: 04/04/2022)
03/21/22	Dyson Technology Ltd v. City Daily Makeup Store 1:21-CV-06567 ( N.D. IL )	FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order 56 in the amount of the Judgment Amount as to certain defendant (Christensen, Jake) (Entered: 03/21/2022)
03/18/22	Dyson Technology Ltd v. City Daily Makeup Store 1:21-CV-06567 ( N.D. IL )	DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 3/18/2022. Mailed notice. (exr, ) (Entered: 03/18/2022)
03/18/22	Dyson Technology Ltd v. City Daily Makeup Store 1:21-CV-06567 ( N.D. IL )	ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the Schedule A complaint to remove defendant Boutique-US 51 is granted. Additionally, in the court's 2/11/2022 minute entry 44, it gave all defendants until 2/24/2022 to object to plaintiff's motion for entry of default and default judgment 41 . The court grants plaintiff's motion 41 for entry of default and default judgment against all defendants identified on Schedule A attached to the court's order. Based on the evidence submitted in support of the temporary restraining order and the motion for entry of default and default judgment, and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiff has established that the infringement was willful, that damages should be awarded as set forth in the Final Judgment Order, and that a permanent injunction should be entered. Plaintiff has shown that the infringement of its design patent causes it irreparable harm in the form of consumer confusion, loss of customers' goodwill, and reputational harm; that monetary damages are inadequate to address these harms; and that the public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction. No defendants have appeared to argue otherwise; thus, the court also finds that the balance of the hardships favors an injunction. The ten thousand dollar ($10,000) surety bond posted by plaintiff is hereby released to plaintiff's counsel. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return the $10,000 surety bond previously deposited with the Clerk of the Court to plaintiff's counsel, Justin R. Gaudio, Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500, Chicago, IL 60606, via certified mail. Enter Default Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 3/18/2022. Mailed notice. (exr, ) (Entered: 03/18/2022) ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the Schedule A complaint to remove defendant Boutique-US 51 is granted. Additionally, in the court's 2/11/2022 minute entry 44, it gave all defendants until 2/24/2022 to object to plaintiff's motion for entry of default and default judgment 41 . The court grants plaintiff's motion 41 for entry of default and default judgment against all defendants identified on Schedule A attached to the court's order. Based on the evidence submitted in support of the temporary restraining order and the motion for entry of default and default judgment, and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiff has established that the infringement was willful, that damages should be awarded as set forth in the Final Judgment Order, and that a permanent injunction should be entered. Plaintiff has shown that the infringement of its design patent causes it irreparable harm in the form of consumer confusion, loss of customers' goodwill, and reputational harm; that monetary damages are inadequate to address these harms; and that the public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction. No defendants have appeared to argue otherwise; thus, the court also finds that the balance of the hardships favors an injunction. The ten thousand dollar ($10,000) surety bond posted by plaintiff is hereby released to plaintiff's counsel. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return the $10,000 surety bond previously deposited with the Clerk of the Court to plaintiff's counsel, Justin R. Gaudio, Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500, Chicago, IL 60606, via certified mail. Enter Default Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 3/18/2022. Mailed notice. (exr, ) (Entered: 03/18/2022)
03/18/22	Dyson Technology Ltd v. City Daily Makeup Store 1:21-CV-06567 ( N.D. IL )	ORDER: Plaintiff`s motion for leave to amend the Schedule A complaint to remove defendant Boutique-US 51 is granted. Additionally, in the court`s 2/11/2022 minute entry 44 , it gave all defendants until 2/24/2022 to object to plaintiff`s motion for entry of default and default judgment 41 . The court grants plaintiff`s motion 41 for entry of default and default judgment against all defendants identified on Schedule A attached to the court`s order. Based on the evidence submitted in support of the temporary restraining order and the motion for entry of default and default judgment, and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiff has established that the infringement was willful, that damages should be awarded as set forth in the Final Judgment Order, and that a permanent injunction should be entered. Plaintiff has shown that the infringement of its design patent causes it irreparable harm in the form of consumer confusion, loss of customers` goodwill, and reputational harm; that monetary damages are inadequate to address these harms; and that the public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction. No defendants have appeared to argue otherwise; thus, the court also finds that the balance of the hardships favors an injunction. The ten thousand dollar ($10,000) surety bond posted by plaintiff is hereby released to plaintiff`s counsel. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return the $10,000 surety bond previously deposited with the Clerk of the Court to plaintiff`s counsel, Justin R. Gaudio, Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500, Chicago, IL 60606, via certified mail. Enter Default Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 3/18/2022. Mailed notice. (exr, ) (Entered: 03/18/2022) ORDER: Plaintiff`s motion for leave to amend the Schedule A complaint to remove defendant Boutique-US 51 is granted. Additionally, in the court`s 2/11/2022 minute entry 44 , it gave all defendants until 2/24/2022 to object to plaintiff`s motion for entry of default and default judgment 41 . The court grants plaintiff`s motion 41 for entry of default and default judgment against all defendants identified on Schedule A attached to the court`s order. Based on the evidence submitted in support of the temporary restraining order and the motion for entry of default and default judgment, and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiff has established that the infringement was willful, that damages should be awarded as set forth in the Final Judgment Order, and that a permanent injunction should be entered. Plaintiff has shown that the infringement of its design patent causes it irreparable harm in the form of consumer confusion, loss of customers` goodwill, and reputational harm; that monetary damages are inadequate to address these harms; and that the public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction. No defendants have appeared to argue otherwise; thus, the court also finds that the balance of the hardships favors an injunction. The ten thousand dollar ($10,000) surety bond posted by plaintiff is hereby released to plaintiff`s counsel. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return the $10,000 surety bond previously deposited with the Clerk of the Court to plaintiff`s counsel, Justin R. Gaudio, Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500, Chicago, IL 60606, via certified mail. Enter Default Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 3/18/2022. Mailed notice. (exr, ) (Entered: 03/18/2022)
03/17/22	Dyson Technology Ltd v. City Daily Makeup Store 1:21-CV-06567 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff`s motion to withdraw the appearance of Abby M. Neu as counsel of record 53 is granted. Attorney Abby Marie Neu terminated. (rao, ) (Entered: 03/17/2022)