Johnson Health Tech North America Inc
General
Total Cases22
Active Cases--
Patents54
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
L2
A
PTAB
L5
E
CAFC
--
--
--
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 01/23/25 | Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), this case is closed without further order of the court. (jat) (Entered: 01/23/2025) | |
| 01/23/25 | Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), this case is closed without further order of the court. (jat) (Entered: 01/23/2025) | |
| 01/22/25 | STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by Plaintiffs Johnson Health Tech North America, Inc., Johnson Health Tech. Co., Ltd.. (Scheller, John) (Entered: 01/22/2025) | |
| 01/22/25 | STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by Plaintiffs Johnson Health Tech North America, Inc., Johnson Health Tech. Co., Ltd.. (Scheller, John) (Entered: 01/22/2025) | |
| 12/27/24 | ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **The court directed plaintiff to show cause why judgment should not be entered in defendant's favor after the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board determined that all of the asserted claims in this case are unpatentable. Dkt. 52 . Plaintiff asks the court to continue the stay until the resolution of any appeals. Dkt. [53] . Plaintiff's request is granted. The parties are directed to notify the court when the appeal process is completed, or, if plaintiff does not file an appeal, when the appeal deadline has passed. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 12/27/2024. (nln) (Entered: 12/27/2024) | |
| 12/27/24 | ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **The court directed plaintiff to show cause why judgment should not be entered in defendant's favor after the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board determined that all of the asserted claims in this case are unpatentable. Dkt. 52 . Plaintiff asks the court to continue the stay until the resolution of any appeals. Dkt. [53] . Plaintiff's request is granted. The parties are directed to notify the court when the appeal process is completed, or, if plaintiff does not file an appeal, when the appeal deadline has passed. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 12/27/2024. (nln) (Entered: 12/27/2024) | |
| 12/20/24 | Response re: 52 Text Only Order. Response to Order to Show Cause Why This Case Should Not Be Dismissed by Plaintiffs Johnson Health Tech North America, Inc., Johnson Health Tech. Co., Ltd. (Brunner, Shane) Modified on 12/23/2024. (lak) (Entered: 12/20/2024) | |
| 12/20/24 | Response re: 52 Text Only Order. Response to Order to Show Cause Why This Case Should Not Be Dismissed by Plaintiffs Johnson Health Tech North America, Inc., Johnson Health Tech. Co., Ltd. (Brunner, Shane) Modified on 12/23/2024. (lak) (Entered: 12/20/2024) | |
| 12/11/24 | ** TEXT ONLY ORDER ** Defendant has notified the court that the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board has determined that all of the asserted claims in this case are unpatentable. Dkt. [51] . Plaintiff may have until December 20 to show cause why this case should not be dismissed in light of the board's rulings. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 12/11/24. (jat) (Entered: 12/11/2024) | |
| 12/11/24 | ** TEXT ONLY ORDER ** Defendant has notified the court that the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board has determined that all of the asserted claims in this case are unpatentable. Dkt. [51] . Plaintiff may have until December 20 to show cause why this case should not be dismissed in light of the board's rulings. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 12/11/24. (jat) (Entered: 12/11/2024) |