Joseph Christopher Lanier

General

Total Cases2

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsC.D. California E.D. Texas

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
01/14/22	Sullstar Tech Inc v. Gary Wermuth 2:21-CV-06640 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 42 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action, including all claims, counterclaims and defenses stated therein against all parties, is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own respective attorney`s fees and costs. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) (Entered: 01/14/2022) ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 42 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action, including all claims, counterclaims and defenses stated therein against all parties, is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own respective attorney`s fees and costs. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) (Entered: 01/14/2022)
01/14/22	Sullstar Tech Inc v. Gary Wermuth 2:21-CV-06640 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 42 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action, including all claims, counterclaims and defenses stated therein against all parties, is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own respective attorney's fees and costs. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) (Entered: 01/14/2022) ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 42 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action, including all claims, counterclaims and defenses stated therein against all parties, is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own respective attorney's fees and costs. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) (Entered: 01/14/2022)
01/13/22	Sullstar Tech Inc v. Gary Wermuth 2:21-CV-06640 ( C.D. CA )	Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by plaintiff Platinum Tools, LLC, SULLSTAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Wu, Charles) (Entered: 01/13/2022)
11/18/21	Sullstar Tech Inc v. Gary Wermuth 2:21-CV-06640 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY THIS ACTION PENDING THE OUTCOME OF PLATINUM TOOLS, LLC, ET AL. V. SIMPLY45, LLC, ET AL. (CV 20-6055-TJH (PVCx) (DKT. 38) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. A stay of proceedings in this action is granted, pending the adjudication of the pending action between Plaintiffs Platinum Tools, LLC, et al., and Defendants Simply45, LLC, et al. This stay shall remain in effect until dissolved by order of the Court; provided, however, the parties shall file a joint report as to the status of the Simply45 Case on or before 3/7/2022, and shall file any updated status reports every 45 days, or within ten days of the entry of judgment in that action, whichever is earlier. re Stipulation to Stay Case 38 . (jp) (Entered: 11/18/2021) ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY THIS ACTION PENDING THE OUTCOME OF PLATINUM TOOLS, LLC, ET AL. V. SIMPLY45, LLC, ET AL. (CV 20-6055-TJH (PVCx) (DKT. 38) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. A stay of proceedings in this action is granted, pending the adjudication of the pending action between Plaintiffs Platinum Tools, LLC, et al., and Defendants Simply45, LLC, et al. This stay shall remain in effect until dissolved by order of the Court; provided, however, the parties shall file a joint report as to the status of the Simply45 Case on or before 3/7/2022, and shall file any updated status reports every 45 days, or within ten days of the entry of judgment in that action, whichever is earlier. re Stipulation to Stay Case 38 . (jp) (Entered: 11/18/2021)
10/18/21	Sullstar Tech Inc v. Gary Wermuth 2:21-CV-06640 ( C.D. CA )	RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Cliff Andrew Wade on behalf of Receiver Timothy Hassinger. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Pursuant to the District Clerk`s direction, please see the attached declaration. (lt) (Entered: 10/18/2021)
09/02/21	Sullstar Tech Inc v. Gary Wermuth 2:21-CV-06640 ( C.D. CA )	RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Michael Edwin Jones on behalf of Defendant Lanier Representation Group, Inc.. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney not appearing as counsel of record. (ak) (Entered: 09/02/2021)
09/01/21	Sullstar Tech Inc v. Gary Wermuth 2:21-CV-06640 ( C.D. CA )	Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending the outcome of Platinum Tools, LLC, et al v. Simply45, LLC et al 20 cv 06055 (TJH) (C.D. Ca) filed by Defendants Mark S. Fukuda, Joseph Christopher Lanier, Lanier Representation Group, Inc., Gary Wermuth. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order to Stay Case Pending Outcome of Platinum Tools, LLC, et al v. Simply45, LLC, et al 20 cv 06055 (TJH))(Sacks, Michael) (Entered: 09/01/2021) Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending the outcome of Platinum Tools, LLC, et al v. Simply45, LLC et al 20 cv 06055 (TJH) (C.D. Ca) filed by Defendants Mark S. Fukuda, Joseph Christopher Lanier, Lanier Representation Group, Inc., Gary Wermuth. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order to Stay Case Pending Outcome of Platinum Tools, LLC, et al v. Simply45, LLC, et al 20 cv 06055 (TJH))(Sacks, Michael) (Entered: 09/01/2021)
08/31/21	Sullstar Tech Inc v. Gary Wermuth 2:21-CV-06640 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/26/2021. (tj) (Entered: 08/31/2021)
08/25/21	Sullstar Tech Inc v. Gary Wermuth 2:21-CV-06640 ( C.D. CA )	REQUEST of Non-Resident Attorney Edward Kelly to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Mark S. Fukuda, Joseph Christopher Lanier, Lanier Representation Group, Inc., Gary Wermuth (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31874680) filed by Defendants Mark S. Fukuda, Joseph Christopher Lanier, Lanier Representation Group, Inc., Gary Wermuth. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Admit Edward Kelly Pro Hac Vice, # 2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing for Edward Kelly) (Attorney Michael Joseph Sacks added to party Mark S. Fukuda(pty:dft), Attorney Michael Joseph Sacks added to party Joseph Christopher Lanier(pty:dft), Attorney Michael Joseph Sacks added to party Lanier Representation Group, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Michael Joseph Sacks added to party Gary Wermuth(pty:dft)) (Sacks, Michael) (Entered: 08/25/2021) REQUEST of Non-Resident Attorney Edward Kelly to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Mark S. Fukuda, Joseph Christopher Lanier, Lanier Representation Group, Inc., Gary Wermuth (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31874680) filed by Defendants Mark S. Fukuda, Joseph Christopher Lanier, Lanier Representation Group, Inc., Gary Wermuth. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Admit Edward Kelly Pro Hac Vice, # 2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing for Edward Kelly) (Attorney Michael Joseph Sacks added to party Mark S. Fukuda(pty:dft), Attorney Michael Joseph Sacks added to party Joseph Christopher Lanier(pty:dft), Attorney Michael Joseph Sacks added to party Lanier Representation Group, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Michael Joseph Sacks added to party Gary Wermuth(pty:dft)) (Sacks, Michael) (Entered: 08/25/2021)
08/19/21	Sullstar Tech Inc v. Gary Wermuth 2:21-CV-06640 ( C.D. CA )	STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court`s Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (droj) (Entered: 08/19/2021) STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court`s Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (droj) (Entered: 08/19/2021)