Kichler Lighting LLC

General

Total Cases5
Active Cases--
Patents112
TypeOperating Company
Elite Ratings
--

Ratings

Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
L1
B
PTAB
L2
C
CAFC
--
--
--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
08/04/23
Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Masco Corporation for Kichler Lighting, LLC filed by Kichler Lighting, LLC. (Gaum, R.) (Entered: 08/04/2023)
08/04/23
Answer to 7 Amended complaint, Counterclaim against SemiLED Innovations LLC filed by Kichler Lighting, LLC. (Gaum, R.) (Entered: 08/04/2023)
08/03/23
Motion for extension of time until October 6, 2023 to answer with proposed order filed by Defendant Kichler Lighting LLC. Related document(s) 1 . (Diaz, Robert) Modified text on 8/4/2023 (M,CE). (Entered: 08/03/2023)
08/03/23
Attorney Appearance by Robert J. Diaz filed by on behalf of Kichler Lighting LLC. (Diaz, Robert) (Entered: 08/03/2023)
08/03/23
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Unopposed 8 Motion for extension of time to answer. Kichler Lighting LLC answer due 10/6/2023. Judge Charles Esque Fleming on 8/3/2023. (S,SR) (Entered: 08/03/2023)
08/03/23
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Unopposed 8 Motion for extension of time to answer. Kichler Lighting LLC answer due 10/6/2023. Judge Charles Esque Fleming on 8/3/2023. (S,SR) (Entered: 08/03/2023)
07/28/23
Order [non-document] granting the parties' unopposed 12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer until August 4, 2023. Judge David A. Ruiz on 7/28/2023. (H,Z) (Entered: 07/28/2023)
07/28/23
Order [non-document] granting the parties' unopposed 12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer until August 4, 2023. Judge David A. Ruiz on 7/28/2023. (H,Z) (Entered: 07/28/2023)
07/27/23
Unopposed Motion for extension of time until August 4, 2023 to answer complaint filed by Plaintiff SemiLED Innovations LLC. Related document 1 . (Kovach, Thomas) (Entered: 07/27/2023)
07/26/23
Order: [non-document] Before the Court is Plaintiff's 6 motion for extension of time until August 30, 2023 for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. While the motion indicates it is unopposed, the record in this case does not indicate any appearance of counsel on behalf of Defendant. Given the unusual nature of the motion (Plaintiff making the request on behalf of the Defendant), especially in light of Defendant's lack of counsel of record, the motion is DENIED. The Court will allow Defendant an additional week (until August 7, 2023) to obtain counsel and file an answer/response to the complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Judge Charles Esque Fleming on 7/26/2023.(S,SR) (Entered: 07/26/2023)