Koji IP LLC

General

Total Cases6

Active Cases1

Patents2

CourtsN.D. California C.D. California D. Colorado

TypeNPE

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
10/11/24	Koji IP LLC v. Guru Wireless Inc 2:24-CV-03713 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (bm) (Entered: 10/11/2024)
10/02/24	Koji IP LLC v. Guru Wireless Inc 2:24-CV-03713 ( C.D. CA )	Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case filed by Plaintiff/Counter Defendant Koji IP, LLC.(Kalra, Susan) (Entered: 10/02/2024)
10/02/24	Koji IP LLC v. Guru Wireless Inc 2:24-CV-03713 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT filed by Plaintiff Koji IP, LLC. (Kalra, Susan) (Entered: 10/02/2024)
09/30/24	Koji IP LLC v. Guru Wireless Inc 2:24-CV-03713 ( C.D. CA )	TEXT ONLY ENTRY (In Chambers) by Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Mircheff for settlement. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) confer with each other and set a date and time for a settlement conference, after clearing the date with Magistrate Judge Mircheff's clerk, Christianna Howard at BFM_Chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. The date selected must be soon enough to comply with any deadlines imposed by the District Judge, BUT NOT BEFORE THE PARTIES HAVE ENGAGED IN SUFFICIENT DISCUSSIONS TO MAKE A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE MEANINGFUL. In general, the parties should contact the court clerk at least 30 days prior to the date on which they wish to hold the settlement conference. Please note that settlement conferences are usually conducted on Thursdays and begin at 10:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. [29] THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ch) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 09/30/2024) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (In Chambers) by Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Mircheff for settlement. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) confer with each other and set a date and time for a settlement conference, after clearing the date with Magistrate Judge Mircheff's clerk, Christianna Howard at BFM_Chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. The date selected must be soon enough to comply with any deadlines imposed by the District Judge, BUT NOT BEFORE THE PARTIES HAVE ENGAGED IN SUFFICIENT DISCUSSIONS TO MAKE A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE MEANINGFUL. In general, the parties should contact the court clerk at least 30 days prior to the date on which they wish to hold the settlement conference. Please note that settlement conferences are usually conducted on Thursdays and begin at 10:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. [29] THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ch) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 09/30/2024)
09/30/24	Koji IP LLC v. Guru Wireless Inc 2:24-CV-03713 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES OF Mandatory Scheduling Conference (Held and completed) held before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Case called and appearances made. On September 18, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why its claims should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution, after Defendant failed to timely answer and Plaintiff failed to seek entry of default. Dkt. No. 19. Defendant filed its answer soon after. In response to the order to show cause (OSC), Plaintiff stated that it chose not to pursue action against Defendant due to ongoing settlement discussions. Dkt. No. 28. The Court discharges the OSC but admonishes the parties that future violations of the Court's orders may result in sanctions. Should the Court issue an OSC in these proceedings in the future, the parties are required to disclose the Court's verbal admonishment. The Court heard from the parties about the contents of their joint Rule 26(f) report. A case management order will be issued separately. The Court sets a status conference for October 4, 2024, at 8:30 a.m. The parties shall meet and confer promptly to discuss their understanding of whether Defendant has commercially marketed or sold any allegedly infringing products. By 9:00 a.m. on October 3, the parties shall submit a joint report on the status of potential resolution in this matter. (see document for further details) Court Reporter: CourtSmart. (bm) (Entered: 09/30/2024) MINUTES OF Mandatory Scheduling Conference (Held and completed) held before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Case called and appearances made. On September 18, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why its claims should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution, after Defendant failed to timely answer and Plaintiff failed to seek entry of default. Dkt. No. 19. Defendant filed its answer soon after. In response to the order to show cause (OSC), Plaintiff stated that it chose not to pursue action against Defendant due to ongoing settlement discussions. Dkt. No. 28. The Court discharges the OSC but admonishes the parties that future violations of the Court's orders may result in sanctions. Should the Court issue an OSC in these proceedings in the future, the parties are required to disclose the Court's verbal admonishment. The Court heard from the parties about the contents of their joint Rule 26(f) report. A case management order will be issued separately. The Court sets a status conference for October 4, 2024, at 8:30 a.m. The parties shall meet and confer promptly to discuss their understanding of whether Defendant has commercially marketed or sold any allegedly infringing products. By 9:00 a.m. on October 3, the parties shall submit a joint report on the status of potential resolution in this matter. (see document for further details) Court Reporter: CourtSmart. (bm) (Entered: 09/30/2024)
09/27/24	Koji IP LLC v. Guru Wireless Inc 2:24-CV-03713 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (lfa) (Entered: 09/27/2024)
09/27/24	Koji IP LLC v. Guru Wireless Inc 2:24-CV-03713 ( C.D. CA )	PRETRIAL AND TRIAL ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (lfa) (Entered: 09/27/2024)
09/27/24	Koji IP LLC v. Guru Wireless Inc 2:24-CV-03713 ( C.D. CA )	CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. Amended Pleadings due by 11/29/2024. Discovery cut-off 2/21/2025. Motions due by 2/28/2025. Last date to conduct settlement conference is 3/14/2025. Jury Trial set for 5/5/2025 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Pretrial Conference set for 4/25/2025 09:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Status Conference set for 3/28/2025 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm) (Entered: 09/27/2024) CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. Amended Pleadings due by 11/29/2024. Discovery cut-off 2/21/2025. Motions due by 2/28/2025. Last date to conduct settlement conference is 3/14/2025. Jury Trial set for 5/5/2025 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Pretrial Conference set for 4/25/2025 09:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Status Conference set for 3/28/2025 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm) (Entered: 09/27/2024)
09/25/24	Koji IP LLC v. Guru Wireless Inc 2:24-CV-03713 ( C.D. CA )	RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Koji IP, LLCto Text Only Scheduling Notice,,, 27 Response to Order to Show Cause (Kalra, Susan) (Entered: 09/25/2024)
09/23/24	Koji IP LLC v. Guru Wireless Inc 2:24-CV-03713 ( C.D. CA )	(In Chambers) Order by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The parties failed to file a joint Rule 26(f) report, as ordered, in advance of the mandatory scheduling conference (MSC). The Court issued another order requiring the parties to file the overdue report and directing Plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The parties filed a noncompliant report, requiring the Court to issue yet another order. Now, Plaintiff's counsel has requested to appear remotely at the MSC because of transportation issues. The Court intends to address the parties in person, and plaintiff's counsel has not demonstrated that she is unable to find another form of transportation to attend the MSC in person. The Court therefore denies the request for lack of good cause. At the MSC, the parties also should be prepared to address their failure to comply with court orders. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lfa) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 09/23/2024) (In Chambers) Order by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The parties failed to file a joint Rule 26(f) report, as ordered, in advance of the mandatory scheduling conference (MSC). The Court issued another order requiring the parties to file the overdue report and directing Plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The parties filed a noncompliant report, requiring the Court to issue yet another order. Now, Plaintiff's counsel has requested to appear remotely at the MSC because of transportation issues. The Court intends to address the parties in person, and plaintiff's counsel has not demonstrated that she is unable to find another form of transportation to attend the MSC in person. The Court therefore denies the request for lack of good cause. At the MSC, the parties also should be prepared to address their failure to comply with court orders. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lfa) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 09/23/2024)