Koninklijke KPN NV
General
Total Cases67
Active Cases4
Patents263
--
--
--
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
L2
C
PTAB
L5
A
CAFC
L2
C
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 01/03/25 | Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Sean Pak, Jared W. Newton, and Kevin Hardy. ( re [7] MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Sean Pak, Jared W. Newton, and Kevin Hardy )( Payment of $ 150, receipt number ADEDC-4582419).(Smith, Rodger) (Entered: 01/03/2025) | |
| 01/03/25 | MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Sean Pak, Jared W. Newton, and Kevin Hardy - filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc.. (Smith, Rodger) (Entered: 01/03/2025) | |
| 01/03/25 | Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Sean Pak, Jared W. Newton, and Kevin Hardy. ( re [6] MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Sean Pak, Jared W. Newton, and Kevin Hardy )( Payment of $ 150, receipt number ADEDC-4582415).(Smith, Rodger) (Entered: 01/03/2025) | |
| 01/03/25 | MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Sean Pak, Jared W. Newton, and Kevin Hardy - filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc.. (Smith, Rodger) (Entered: 01/03/2025) | |
| 01/02/25 | ORAL ORDER. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file its Complaint under seal (D.I. [1] ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED insofar as it seeks to file the Complaint under seal. It is DENIED insofar as it seeks permission to file Exhibit A as the redacted public version of the Complaint. The only thing in paragraph 14 of the Complaint for which good cause exists for keeping it from the public is the amount of the payment (i.e., two words). No good cause exists to maintain under seal anything in paragraphs 15, 16, 20, 21, 25, 50, 57, 63, 69, 74, 80, 86, 92, and 98 of the Complaint. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file no later than January 9, 2025 a redacted version of the Complaint consistent with this ORAL ORDER. (Setting Deadlines: Notice of Compliance deadline set for 1/9/2025.) Ordered by Unassigned Judge on 1/2/2025. (kmd) (Entered: 01/02/2025) | |
| 01/02/25 | Remark: Case submitted for routine judicial assignment. (cdd) (Entered: 01/02/2025) | |
| 01/02/25 | ORAL ORDER. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file its Complaint under seal (D.I. [1] ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED insofar as it seeks to file the Complaint under seal. It is DENIED insofar as it seeks permission to file Exhibit A as the redacted public version of the Complaint. The only thing in paragraph 13 of the Complaint for which good cause exists for keeping it from the public is the amount of the payment (i.e., two words). No good cause exists to maintain under seal anything in paragraphs 14, 15, 20, 22, 24, 27, 50, 56, 62, 68, 74, 80, 86, and 92 of the Complaint. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file no later than January 9, 2025 a redacted version of the Complaint consistent with this ORAL ORDER. (Setting Deadlines: Notice of Compliance deadline set for 1/9/2025.) Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/2/2025. (kmd) (Entered: 01/02/2025) | |
| 01/02/25 | Remark: Case submitted for routine judicial assignment. (jfm) (Entered: 01/02/2025) | |
| 01/02/25 | Summons Issued as to Koninklijke KPN N.V. and Nederlandse Organisatie voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek TNO on 1/1/2025. (Attachments: # [1] Summons Issued, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek TNO)(jfm) (Entered: 01/02/2025) | |
| 01/02/25 | Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. for Samsung Electronics America, Inc. filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (jfm) (Entered: 01/02/2025) |