Laforst Shoes, Inc.

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsC.D. California

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

laforstshoes.com

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
10/27/23	Skechers USA Inc v. Laforst Shoes Inc 2:23-CV-06783 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing). (Attachments: # 1 Judgment) (jp) (Entered: 10/27/2023)
10/27/23	Skechers USA Inc v. Laforst Shoes Inc 2:23-CV-06783 ( C.D. CA )	JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton is hereby entered in favor of Skechers and against Laforst on each one of Skechers five claims that Laforst infringed each one of the following five United States design patents owned by Skechers. Skechers and Laforst shall each bear their respective costs and attorney fees. The Court ORDERS as follows: Laforst and its officers, agents, employees, representatives, assigns, and attorneys and those in active concert or participation with Laforst who receive actual notice of this order, are enjoined. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). See document for further information. (jp) (Entered: 10/27/2023) JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton is hereby entered in favor of Skechers and against Laforst on each one of Skechers five claims that Laforst infringed each one of the following five United States design patents owned by Skechers. Skechers and Laforst shall each bear their respective costs and attorney fees. The Court ORDERS as follows: Laforst and its officers, agents, employees, representatives, assigns, and attorneys and those in active concert or participation with Laforst who receive actual notice of this order, are enjoined. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). See document for further information. (jp) (Entered: 10/27/2023)
10/19/23	Skechers USA Inc v. Laforst Shoes Inc 2:23-CV-06783 ( C.D. CA )	STIPULATION for Judgment as to Entry of Judgment and Injunction against defendant Laforst Shoes, Inc. filed by plaintiff Skechers U.S.A. Inc., Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Ex. 1 - Proposed Judgment and Injunction)(Mattes, Bradford) (Entered: 10/19/2023)
09/27/23	Skechers USA Inc v. Laforst Shoes Inc 2:23-CV-06783 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton, as follows: Skechers shall have thirty (30) days to either (1) finalize its settlement with Defendant Laforst Shoes and file a stipulated judgment and injunction, or (2) to file for a default judgment if a settlement has not been finalized by then and the complaint still has not been responded to by Defendant Laforst Shoes. Failure to do so shall result in the immediate dismissal of this case without further notice. (jp) (Entered: 09/27/2023) ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton, as follows: Skechers shall have thirty (30) days to either (1) finalize its settlement with Defendant Laforst Shoes and file a stipulated judgment and injunction, or (2) to file for a default judgment if a settlement has not been finalized by then and the complaint still has not been responded to by Defendant Laforst Shoes. Failure to do so shall result in the immediate dismissal of this case without further notice. (jp) (Entered: 09/27/2023)
09/26/23	Skechers USA Inc v. Laforst Shoes Inc 2:23-CV-06783 ( C.D. CA )	TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Counsel and/or the parties are advised that the Court has updated its procedures in civil cases, including procedures encouraging consent to the magistrate judge in ordinary civil cases; setting forth presumptive schedules for class certification motion briefing; simplifying the requirements for substituting named defendants for Doe defendants; clarifying requirements for submission of mandatory chambers copies of voluminous exhibits; substituting compliance with the Local Rule regarding limitations on the number of words in the parties briefing for the Courts previous page limitations on briefing; imposing further limitations on the number of words in reply briefs; updating the Courts procedures in the case of settlement, including procedures for orders imposing stays of proceedings, orders of dismissal, and retention of jurisdiction by the Court; imposing limitations on both the number of and the content of motions in limine; and clarifying trial exhibit preparation, including the requirement to prepare a separate binder of exhibits for each witness. These updates are found on the Courts procedures page, and/or the Courts Initial Standing Order and Civil Trial Order, attached thereto. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cbr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 09/26/2023) TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Counsel and/or the parties are advised that the Court has updated its procedures in civil cases, including procedures encouraging consent to the magistrate judge in ordinary civil cases; setting forth presumptive schedules for class certification motion briefing; simplifying the requirements for substituting named defendants for Doe defendants; clarifying requirements for submission of mandatory chambers copies of voluminous exhibits; substituting compliance with the Local Rule regarding limitations on the number of words in the parties briefing for the Courts previous page limitations on briefing; imposing further limitations on the number of words in reply briefs; updating the Courts procedures in the case of settlement, including procedures for orders imposing stays of proceedings, orders of dismissal, and retention of jurisdiction by the Court; imposing limitations on both the number of and the content of motions in limine; and clarifying trial exhibit preparation, including the requirement to prepare a separate binder of exhibits for each witness. These updates are found on the Courts procedures page, and/or the Courts Initial Standing Order and Civil Trial Order, attached thereto. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cbr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 09/26/2023)
09/18/23	Skechers USA Inc v. Laforst Shoes Inc 2:23-CV-06783 ( C.D. CA )	RESPONSE filed by Plaintiffs Skechers U.S.A. Inc., Skechers U.S.A., Inc. IIto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings, 12 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Mattes, Bradford) (Entered: 09/18/2023)
09/13/23	Skechers USA Inc v. Laforst Shoes Inc 2:23-CV-06783 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Josephine L. Staton: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff, to show cause in writing no later than September 20, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiffs, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Answer to the Complaint; Request for Entry of Default; or Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (F.R.Civ.P. 41). The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiffs is due. (lc) (Entered: 09/13/2023) MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Josephine L. Staton: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff, to show cause in writing no later than September 20, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiffs, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Answer to the Complaint; Request for Entry of Default; or Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (F.R.Civ.P. 41). The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiffs is due. (lc) (Entered: 09/13/2023)
08/24/23	Skechers USA Inc v. Laforst Shoes Inc 2:23-CV-06783 ( C.D. CA )	PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Skechers U.S.A. Inc., Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II, upon Defendant Laforst Shoes, Inc. served on 8/18/2023, answer due 9/8/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Patrick Chow, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy (Lerner, Marshall) (Entered: 08/24/2023) PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Skechers U.S.A. Inc., Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II, upon Defendant Laforst Shoes, Inc. served on 8/18/2023, answer due 9/8/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Patrick Chow, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy (Lerner, Marshall) (Entered: 08/24/2023)
08/24/23	Skechers USA Inc v. Laforst Shoes Inc 2:23-CV-06783 ( C.D. CA )	INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (gga) (Entered: 08/24/2023)
08/18/23	Skechers USA Inc v. Laforst Shoes Inc 2:23-CV-06783 ( C.D. CA )	21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 as to Defendant Laforst Shoes, Inc. (ghap) (Entered: 08/18/2023)