Lam Research Corp

General

Total Cases17

Active Cases3

Patents3,194

CourtsN.D. California D. Delaware E.D. Texas

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

PTAB

lamresearch.com

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

L2

C

PTAB

L4

B

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
10/10/24	Inpria Corp v. Lam Research Corp 1:22-CV-01359 ( D. DE )	PROPOSED ORDER Supplemental ESI Discovery Order by Inpria Corporation. (Poff, Adam) (Entered: 10/10/2024)
10/10/24	Inpria Corp v. Lam Research Corp 1:22-CV-01359 ( D. DE )	ORAL ORDER: The Court has reviewed Defendant’s motion for leave to file an amended Answer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (D.I. [149] (“motion to amend the Answer to the FAC”)) It has also reviewed the parties’ recent letters regarding the currently-scheduled October 15 hearing on the motion to amend the Answer to the FAC, as well as regarding events that have occurred subsequent to the scheduling of that October 15 hearing, including: (1) Plaintiff’s filing of a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), (D.I. [169] ); (2) Defendant’s filing of an Answer to the SAC, (D.I. [174] ); and (3) Plaintiff’s filing of a motion to strike portions of Defendant’s Answer to the SAC (“motion to strike”), (D.I. [184] ). (D.I. [187] ; D.I. [188] ) In light of these subsequent events, the Court hereby DENIES as MOOT the motion to amend the Answer to the FAC, as that motion sought to amend an Answer that is no longer operative (an Answer to a complaint that is itself no longer operative). The Court thus also ORDERS that the October 15, 2024 hearing is CANCELED. Any ongoing disputes with regard to Defendant’s ability to include certain defenses and counterclaims in its now-operative Answer shall be addressed when the Court resolves Plaintiff’s motion to strike, which has not yet finished briefing. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/10/2024. (smg) (Entered: 10/10/2024) ORAL ORDER: The Court has reviewed Defendant’s motion for leave to file an amended Answer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (D.I. [149] (“motion to amend the Answer to the FAC”)) It has also reviewed the parties’ recent letters regarding the currently-scheduled October 15 hearing on the motion to amend the Answer to the FAC, as well as regarding events that have occurred subsequent to the scheduling of that October 15 hearing, including: (1) Plaintiff’s filing of a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), (D.I. [169] ); (2) Defendant’s filing of an Answer to the SAC, (D.I. [174] ); and (3) Plaintiff’s filing of a motion to strike portions of Defendant’s Answer to the SAC (“motion to strike”), (D.I. [184] ). (D.I. [187] ; D.I. [188] ) In light of these subsequent events, the Court hereby DENIES as MOOT the motion to amend the Answer to the FAC, as that motion sought to amend an Answer that is no longer operative (an Answer to a complaint that is itself no longer operative). The Court thus also ORDERS that the October 15, 2024 hearing is CANCELED. Any ongoing disputes with regard to Defendant’s ability to include certain defenses and counterclaims in its now-operative Answer shall be addressed when the Court resolves Plaintiff’s motion to strike, which has not yet finished briefing. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/10/2024. (smg) (Entered: 10/10/2024)
10/09/24	Inpria Corp v. Lam Research Corp 1:22-CV-01359 ( D. DE )	Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Adam W. Poff regarding October 15, 2024 oral hearing. (Poff, Adam) (Entered: 10/09/2024)
10/09/24	Inpria Corp v. Lam Research Corp 1:22-CV-01359 ( D. DE )	Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from John V. Gorman regarding notifying the Court of events relating to Defendant's pending motion for leave to file an amended answer - re 167 Oral Order & [149] MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Answer to Inpria Corp.'s Complaint and New Counterclaims. (Gorman, John) Modified on 10/9/2024 (smg). (Entered: 10/09/2024)
10/08/24	Inpria Corp v. Lam Research Corp 1:22-CV-01359 ( D. DE )	DECLARATION re [184] MOTION to Strike, or Dismiss, Defendant's New Counterclaims and Defenses re [174] Answer to Amended Complaint,, Counterclaim, of Chetan R. Bansal by Inpria Corporation. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit A - G)(Vrana, Robert) (Entered: 10/08/2024)
10/08/24	Inpria Corp v. Lam Research Corp 1:22-CV-01359 ( D. DE )	[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re [184] MOTION to Strike, or Dismiss, Defendant's New Counterclaims and Defenses re [174] Answer to Amended Complaint,, Counterclaim, filed by Inpria Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 10/22/2024. (Vrana, Robert) (Entered: 10/08/2024)
10/08/24	Inpria Corp v. Lam Research Corp 1:22-CV-01359 ( D. DE )	MOTION to Strike, or Dismiss, Defendant's New Counterclaims and Defenses re [174] Answer to Amended Complaint,, Counterclaim, - filed by Inpria Corporation. (Attachments: # [1] Text of Proposed Order)(Vrana, Robert) (Entered: 10/08/2024)
10/07/24	Inpria Corp v. Lam Research Corp 1:22-CV-01359 ( D. DE )	NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's First Supplemental Objections and Responses to Defendant's Second Set of Interrogatories to Inpria (Nos. 8-14). filed by Inpria Corporation.(Vrana, Robert) (Entered: 10/07/2024)
10/07/24	Inpria Corp v. Lam Research Corp 1:22-CV-01359 ( D. DE )	Pro Hac Vice Attorney Sachiko Taniguchi, Joshua M. Bennett for Inpria Corporation added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (cdd) (Entered: 10/07/2024)
10/04/24	Inpria Corp v. Lam Research Corp 1:22-CV-01359 ( D. DE )	Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Joshua M. Bennett and Sachiko Taniguchi. ( re [181] MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Joshua M. Bennett and Sachiko Taniguchi )( Payment of $ 100, receipt number ADEDC-4516223).(Mackrides, Daniel) (Entered: 10/04/2024)