Lancium LLC

General

Total Cases11

Active Cases2

Patents39

CourtsS.D. Texas W.D. Texas D. Delaware

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

L2

C

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
03/13/24	Bearbox LLC v. Lancium LLC 1:21-CV-00534 ( D. DE )	The following patents were Not Instituted by PTAB: Patent US10608433 in IPR2023-01407
01/09/24	Bearbox LLC v. Lancium LLC 1:21-CV-00534 ( D. DE )	MEMORANDUM ORDER re [269] MOTION for Attorney Fees and Expenses filed by Raymond E. Cline, Jr., Michael T. McNamara, Lancium LLC is DENIED. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 1/9/24. (ntl) (Entered: 01/09/2024)
09/13/23	Bearbox LLC v. Lancium LLC 1:21-CV-00534 ( D. DE )	The following PTAB cases were filed: Patent US10608433 in IPR2023-01407
08/14/23	Rosenblatt Innovations LLC v. Icc Northwest Inc 3:23-CV-02397 ( N.D. CA )	Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of remaining Defendant Niebaum-Coppola Estate Winery, L.P. filed by Rosenblatt Innovations LLC, Sonoma Cast Stone Corporation. (Stainbrook, Craig) (Filed on 8/14/2023) Modified on 8/14/2023 (bns, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 08/14/2023)
08/11/23	Rosenblatt Innovations LLC v. Icc Northwest Inc 3:23-CV-02397 ( N.D. CA )	CLERKS NOTICE FOR LATE CMC STATEMENT. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f)(2), Civil Local Rules 16-9 and 16-10(d), and Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros's Standing Order, the parties' Joint Case Management Statement was due to be filed by August 10, 2023. The parties have not yet filed a Joint Case Management Statement. Therefore, they shall file a Joint Case Management Statement by no later than 3:00 p.m. on August 14, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2023) (Entered: 08/11/2023) CLERKS NOTICE FOR LATE CMC STATEMENT. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f)(2), Civil Local Rules 16-9 and 16-10(d), and Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros's Standing Order, the parties' Joint Case Management Statement was due to be filed by August 10, 2023. The parties have not yet filed a Joint Case Management Statement. Therefore, they shall file a Joint Case Management Statement by no later than 3:00 p.m. on August 14, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2023) (Entered: 08/11/2023)
07/07/23	Obm Inc v. Lancium LLC 4:23-CV-01798 ( S.D. TX )	SEALED EXHIBITS re: 21 Reply in Support of Motion by Lancium LLC, filed. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 20, # 2 Exhibit 25) (Valenzuela, Daniel) (Entered: 07/07/2023)
07/07/23	Obm Inc v. Lancium LLC 4:23-CV-01798 ( S.D. TX )	REPLY in Support of 17 MOTION to Dismiss 1 Complaint, filed by Lancium LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix with declarations and exhibits)(Valenzuela, Daniel) (Entered: 07/07/2023)
07/05/23	Lancium LLC v. US Data Mining Group Inc 6:23-CV-00344 ( W.D. TX )	ORDER GRANTING 15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer ; U.S. Data King Mountain LLC, U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc. and U.S. Mining Infrastructure Operations, LLC answer due 10/2/2023. All other deadlines in this matter are STAYED until October 2, 2023. Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (lad) (Entered: 07/05/2023)
07/01/23	Lancium LLC v. US Data Mining Group Inc 6:23-CV-00344 ( W.D. TX )	Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, and Stay of All Other Deadlines by Lancium LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Nelson, Mark) (Entered: 07/01/2023)
06/30/23	Obm Inc v. Lancium LLC 4:23-CV-01798 ( S.D. TX )	RESPONSE in Opposition to 17 MOTION to Dismiss 1 Complaint, filed by OBM, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Affidavit, # 3 Affidavit, # 4 Exhibit 1, # 5 Exhibit 2, # 6 Exhibit 3, # 7 Exhibit 4, # 8 Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit 6, # 10 Exhibit 7, # 11 Exhibit 8, # 12 Exhibit 9, # 13 Exhibit 10, # 14 Exhibit 11, # 15 Exhibit 12, # 16 Exhibit 13, # 17 Exhibit 14)(Miller, Rodney) (Entered: 06/30/2023) RESPONSE in Opposition to 17 MOTION to Dismiss 1 Complaint, filed by OBM, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Affidavit, # 3 Affidavit, # 4 Exhibit 1, # 5 Exhibit 2, # 6 Exhibit 3, # 7 Exhibit 4, # 8 Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit 6, # 10 Exhibit 7, # 11 Exhibit 8, # 12 Exhibit 9, # 13 Exhibit 10, # 14 Exhibit 11, # 15 Exhibit 12, # 16 Exhibit 13, # 17 Exhibit 14)(Miller, Rodney) (Entered: 06/30/2023)