Living Style Products Singapore Pte Ltd

General

Total Cases1
Active Cases1
Patents--
TypeOperating Company
Elite Ratings
--
--
--
--

Ratings

Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
09/01/22
JUDGMENT is entered by the Clerk and this case is dismissed in its entirety. (lgib, ) (Entered: 09/01/2022)
09/01/22
ORDER: Plaintiffs' Corrected Motion for Default Judgment, ECF No. 98 , is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' prior and since corrected (via ECF No. 98 ) Motion for Default Judgment, ECF No. 95 , is denied as moot. Signed by the Honorable Sherri A Lydon on 9/1/2022. (lgib, ) (Entered: 09/01/2022)
09/01/22
Final Civil Docket 09-01-2022
07/05/22
Amended MOTION for Default Judgment as to Global Furniture (Zhejiang) Co., LTD., INC. by James E Grove(an individual), LF Products Pte Ltd(a Singapore Limited Company), Living Style (BVI) Limited(a British Virgin Islands Company). Response to Motion due by 7/19/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Nathaniel Dilger, # 2 Exhibit A to the Declaration of Nathaniel Dilger (Invoices), # 3 Exhibit B to the Declaration of Nathaniel Dilger (Notice of Infringement), # 4 Exhibit C to the Declaration of Nathaniel Dilger (Proof of Service), # 5 Exhibit D to the Declaration of Nathaniel Dilger (Proof of Service), # 6 Exhibit E to the Declaration of Nathaniel Dilger (Proof of Service), # 7 Affidavit of Dan Tacheny, # 8 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Shaw, Scott) (Entered: 07/05/2022)
06/22/22
TEXT ORDER: The Court orders Plaintiff to correct and/or supplement its Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant Global Furniture (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd., Inc. [ECF 95 -1 through ECF 95 -4] (the "Motion") in fourteen days (no extensions will be granted absent exceptional circumstances) as follows: (1) regarding the reference on page 9 of the Motion [ECF 95 -1] and in Paragraph 4 of the Motion's attached Declaration of Dan Tacheny [ECF 95 -3] to "the '531" patent, confirm whether the reference to a '531 patent is a typographical error and was intended to reference the '553 patent and update, supplement, and/or correct the Motion and Declaration accordingly if so; (2) supplement Mr. Dilger's statement in Paragraph 15 of his Declaration [ECF 95 -2] that "[s]ince the withdrawal of Mr. Perkins, all papers in this matter have been properly served on the Chinese Defendant using the contact information provided by Mr. Perkins" by filing supporting documentation evidencing proof of service; (3) supplement the Motion and supporting Declaration of Mr. Dilger at ECF 95 -2 with invoice documentation to support the requested fees and costs amounts by clearly showing and evidencing hours worked by task and by individual (noting the individual's role and relevant dates), the associated hourly rates, the amount of fees as separated from the amount of costs, and what the requested costs are for (with supporting receipt documentation where available); (4) provide the requested amount of prejudgment interest along with the date from which Plaintiff asserts prejudgment interest should begin accruing and Plaintiff's proposed calculation supporting the requested prejudgment interest amount; and (5) submit the proposed permanent injunction referenced in Plaintiff's proposed order at ECF 95 -4. Signed by the Honorable Sherri A Lydon on 6/22/2022. (lgib, ) (Entered: 06/22/2022)
03/24/22
MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendant Global Furniture (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd., Inc. by James E Grove(an individual), LF Products Pte Ltd(a Singapore Limited Company), Living Style (BVI) Limited(a British Virgin Islands Company). Response to Motion due by 4/7/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: # 1 Memo in Support, # 2 Affidavit of Nathaniel Dilger, # 3 Affidavit of Dan Tacheny, # 4 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Shaw, Scott) (Entered: 03/24/2022)
03/14/22
ORDER: TEXT ORDER granting 91 Motion for Extension of Time. The court extends the deadline to refile the motion for default judgment to March 24, 2022. However, the court directs counsel's attention to Judge Lydon's Standard Preference 9. It states: "Motions for extension of time should not be filed on the date of the current deadline. Motions filed on the date of the current deadline will be denied barring a showing of extraordinary circumstances." The motion for extension of time in this case was filed on the date of the current deadline. The court is excusing the failure to comply with Standard Preference 9 and putting counsel on notice that any future failure to comply will result in a denial of the extension request. No additional extensions of the deadline to refile the motion for default judgment will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. Signed by the Honorable Sherri A Lydon on 3/14/2022. (lgib, ) (Entered: 03/14/2022)
03/10/22
AFFIDAVIT in Support re 91 MOTION for Extension of Time [Plaintiffs' Request for Two-Week Enlargement of Time to File Motion against Defendant Global Furniture (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd) (Declaration of Scott Shaw) Response filed by Living Style (BVI) Limited, James E Grove, LF Products Pte Ltd. (Shaw, Scott) (Entered: 03/10/2022)
03/10/22
MOTION for Extension of Time [Plaintiffs' Request for Two-Week Enlargement of Time to File Motion against Defendant Global Furniture (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd) by James E Grove, LF Products Pte Ltd, Living Style (BVI) Limited. Response to Motion due by 3/24/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Shaw, Scott) (Entered: 03/10/2022)
02/24/22
ORDER: In accordance with the foregoing analysis, Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment, ECF No. 88 , is DENIED without prejudice to refile within 14 days of the date of this Order. If Plaintiffs fail to refile the Motion or the refiled Motion fails to comport with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Local Civil Rules of this court, the court will dismiss the remaining claims against the Chinese Defendant for failure to prosecute and comply with a court order in accordance with Rule 41(b), FRCP. Signed by the Honorable Sherri A Lydon on 2/24/2022. (lgib, ) (Entered: 02/24/2022)