Luis Felipe Salazar

General

Total Cases1
Active Cases--
Patents--
TypeOperating Company
Elite Ratings
--
--
--
--

Ratings

Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
03/02/22
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 4/30/2022. (yl) (Entered: 03/02/2022)
03/01/22
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 4/30/2022. (yl)
03/01/22
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment, DENIES Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment of validity, and GRANTS Defendants' motion to stay by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of Validity, and GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Stay Case Pending Ex Parte Reexamination. The case is administratively closed. Any party may file a motion to reopen the case after the conclusion of the ex parte reexamination. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl)
03/01/22
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants` motion for partial summary judgment, DENIES Plaintiffs` motion for summary judgment of validity, and GRANTS Defendants` motion to stay by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants` Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, DENIES Plaintiffs` Motion for Summary Judgment of Validity, and GRANTS Defendants` Motion to Stay Case Pending Ex Parte Reexamination. The case is administratively closed. Any party may file a motion to reopen the case after the conclusion of the ex parte reexamination. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl) (Entered: 03/01/2022)
03/01/22
Final Civil Docket 03-01-2022
02/27/22
REQUEST for ADR Procedure No. 2 filed. Parties request to appear before a neutral selected from the court`s Mediation Panel for mediation. Filed by Plaintiffs B and T Industries, LLC, B-5, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Parties` Stipulation Regarding Selection of Panel Mediator (Docket Entry 82))(Pfister, Charles) (Entered: 02/27/2022)
02/27/22
REQUEST for ADR Procedure No. 2 filed. Parties request to appear before a neutral selected from the court's Mediation Panel for mediation. Filed by Plaintiffs B and T Industries, LLC, B-5 Inc. (Attachments: # [1] Parties' Stipulation Regarding Selection of Panel Mediator (Docket Entry 82))(Pfister, Charles)
02/25/22
TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Please be advised the jury trial date [24] is reset to 04/21/22 at 9am. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (wm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
02/25/22
TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Please be advised the jury trial date 24 is reset to 04/21/22 at 9am. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (wm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 02/25/2022)
02/24/22
STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Mr. Lester Savit may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. All parties and the Panel Mediator have agreed that the mediation will be held on 3/7/2022 and counsel will submit mediation statements seven (7) calendar days before the session. Filed by Plaintiffs B and T Industries, LLC, B-5 Inc. (Pfister, Charles)