LYFT Inc

General

Total Cases60

Active Cases12

Patents595

CourtsW.D. Texas N.D. California E.D. Texas

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

L2

B

PTAB

L5

C

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
10/29/24	Fare Technologies LLC v. Lyft Inc 3:23-CV-04935 ( N.D. CA )	CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2024) (Entered: 10/29/2024)
10/29/24	Fare Technologies LLC v. Lyft Inc 3:23-CV-04935 ( N.D. CA )	ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE UNDER RULE 41(B). Signed by Judge Rita F. Lin on 10/29/2024. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2024) (Entered: 10/29/2024)
10/28/24	Fare Technologies LLC v. Lyft Inc 3:23-CV-04935 ( N.D. CA )	STATUS REPORT by Fare Technologies LLC. (Kalra, Susan) (Filed on 10/28/2024) (Entered: 10/28/2024)
10/21/24	Fare Technologies LLC v. Lyft Inc 3:23-CV-04935 ( N.D. CA )	ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. New plaintiff's counsel was ordered to enter a notice of appearance by 10/20/24 but has not done so. If no notice of appearance is entered by 10/28/2024, and no status report is provided by that date, the Court will dismiss this case without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b). Signed by Judge Rita F. Lin on October 21, 2024. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rfllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2024) (Entered: 10/21/2024) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. New plaintiff's counsel was ordered to enter a notice of appearance by 10/20/24 but has not done so. If no notice of appearance is entered by 10/28/2024, and no status report is provided by that date, the Court will dismiss this case without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b). Signed by Judge Rita F. Lin on October 21, 2024. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rfllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2024) (Entered: 10/21/2024)
10/01/24	Wirelesswerx IP LLC v. Lyft Inc 5:24-CV-01144 ( N.D. CA )	ORDER re [61] September 30, 2024 Status Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 10/1/2024. (vkdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2024) (Entered: 10/01/2024)
09/30/24	Wirelesswerx IP LLC v. Lyft Inc 5:24-CV-01144 ( N.D. CA )	STATUS REPORT Parties' Joint Status Update by Lyft, Inc.. (Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 9/30/2024) (Entered: 09/30/2024)
09/23/24	Fare Technologies LLC v. Lyft Inc 3:23-CV-04935 ( N.D. CA )	ORDER. In view of the [97] Status Report, the deadline for new plaintiff's counsel to enter a notice of appearance is extended by 30 days to 10/20/24. No further extensions shall be granted absent exceptional circumstances. If by that point the case cannot move forward, the Court cautions that the case may be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute.Moreover, the Court cannot consider Fare Technologies LLC's request for a determination that the case is non-frivolous and non-exceptional because the motion cannot be made without an attorney and is thus not properly before the Court. Signed by Judge Rita F. Lin on September 23, 2024. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rfllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2024) (Entered: 09/23/2024) ORDER. In view of the [97] Status Report, the deadline for new plaintiff's counsel to enter a notice of appearance is extended by 30 days to 10/20/24. No further extensions shall be granted absent exceptional circumstances. If by that point the case cannot move forward, the Court cautions that the case may be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute.Moreover, the Court cannot consider Fare Technologies LLC's request for a determination that the case is non-frivolous and non-exceptional because the motion cannot be made without an attorney and is thus not properly before the Court. Signed by Judge Rita F. Lin on September 23, 2024. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rfllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2024) (Entered: 09/23/2024)
09/23/24	Wirelesswerx IP LLC v. Lyft Inc 5:24-CV-01144 ( N.D. CA )	ORDER FOR FURTHER STATUS REPORT. Status Report due by 9/30/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 9/23/2024. (vkdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2024) (Entered: 09/23/2024)
09/20/24	Fare Technologies LLC v. Lyft Inc 3:23-CV-04935 ( N.D. CA )	STATUS REPORT by Fare Technologies LLC. (Kalra, Susan) (Filed on 9/20/2024) (Entered: 09/20/2024)
08/21/24	Fare Technologies LLC v. Lyft Inc 3:23-CV-04935 ( N.D. CA )	Minute Entry for proceedings held by Zoom before Judge Rita F. Lin: Motion Hearing held on 8/21/2024 re [91] MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Fare Technologies LLC. The Court grants the [91] motion to withdraw subject to the condition set forth in Civil Local Rule 11-5(b) that documents may continue to be served on Ramey LLP for forwarding purposes, and that Ramey LLP continue to help plaintiff e-file any status reports regarding retention of counsel, unless and until the plaintiff retains new counsel. The Court set the deadline for new plaintiff's counsel to enter a notice of appearance as 9/20/2024. If no counsel has appeared for plaintiff by that date, plaintiff must file a status report by that date explaining its diligent efforts to retain new counsel and the reasons for the delay. The Court cautioned plaintiff that a corporation may only appear through counsel and that if plaintiff is unable to retain new counsel by the deadline, the case may be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b) without further notice. No case management conference was held due to plaintiff no longer being represented by counsel. Digital Recording Time: 11:02-11:11; SEALED 11:15-11:27; 11:36- 11:41. Attorney for Plaintiff: Bill Ramey. Attorney for Defendant: Jeremy Taylor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 8/21/2024) (Entered: 08/21/2024) Minute Entry for proceedings held by Zoom before Judge Rita F. Lin: Motion Hearing held on 8/21/2024 re [91] MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Fare Technologies LLC. The Court grants the [91] motion to withdraw subject to the condition set forth in Civil Local Rule 11-5(b) that documents may continue to be served on Ramey LLP for forwarding purposes, and that Ramey LLP continue to help plaintiff e-file any status reports regarding retention of counsel, unless and until the plaintiff retains new counsel. The Court set the deadline for new plaintiff's counsel to enter a notice of appearance as 9/20/2024. If no counsel has appeared for plaintiff by that date, plaintiff must file a status report by that date explaining its diligent efforts to retain new counsel and the reasons for the delay. The Court cautioned plaintiff that a corporation may only appear through counsel and that if plaintiff is unable to retain new counsel by the deadline, the case may be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b) without further notice. No case management conference was held due to plaintiff no longer being represented by counsel. Digital Recording Time: 11:02-11:11; SEALED 11:15-11:27; 11:36- 11:41. Attorney for Plaintiff: Bill Ramey. Attorney for Defendant: Jeremy Taylor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 8/21/2024) (Entered: 08/21/2024)