Lysse Partners LLC

General

Total Cases2

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsS.D. New York

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
06/07/24	Lysse Partners LLC v. Cavern Club LLC 1:24-CV-00274 ( S.D. NY )	STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL: Plaintiff Lysse Partners LLC, and defendant Cavern Club LLC (d/b/a Liverpool Jeans, Liverpool Division of Cavern Club), by and through their respective counsel of record, and pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action, together with any and all claims and defenses, with prejudice. The parties further stipulate that each party shall bear or pay its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 6/6/2024) (ks) (Entered: 06/07/2024) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL: Plaintiff Lysse Partners LLC, and defendant Cavern Club LLC (d/b/a Liverpool Jeans, Liverpool Division of Cavern Club), by and through their respective counsel of record, and pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action, together with any and all claims and defenses, with prejudice. The parties further stipulate that each party shall bear or pay its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 6/6/2024) (ks) (Entered: 06/07/2024)
06/05/24	Lysse Partners LLC v. Cavern Club LLC 1:24-CV-00274 ( S.D. NY )	STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Cavern Club, LLC. Document filed by Lysse Partners LLC. Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff...(Ederer, Louis) (Entered: 06/05/2024)
05/21/24	Lysse Partners LLC v. Cavern Club LLC 1:24-CV-00274 ( S.D. NY )	AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 5/21/24 in a court action filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (yv) (Main Document 36 replaced on 5/22/2024) (yv). (Entered: 05/21/2024) AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 5/21/24 in a court action filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (yv) (Main Document 36 replaced on 5/22/2024) (yv). (Entered: 05/21/2024)
05/21/24	Lysse Partners LLC v. Cavern Club LLC 1:24-CV-00274 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER OF DISMISSAL... It is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby DISMISSED and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within sixty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed by the aforementioned deadline; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, requests to extend the deadline to reopen are unlikely to be granted. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to reopen to be "so ordered" by the Court. Per Paragraph 5.B of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 34, and to close the case.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 5/21/24) (yv) (Entered: 05/21/2024) ORDER OF DISMISSAL... It is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby DISMISSED and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within sixty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed by the aforementioned deadline; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, requests to extend the deadline to reopen are unlikely to be granted. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to reopen to be "so ordered" by the Court. Per Paragraph 5.B of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 34, and to close the case.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 5/21/24) (yv) (Entered: 05/21/2024)
05/21/24	Lysse Partners LLC v. Cavern Club LLC 1:24-CV-00274 ( S.D. NY )	JOINT LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference (Initial Pretrial Conference) addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Louis S. Ederer dated May 21, 2024. Document filed by Lysse Partners LLC..(Ederer, Louis) (Entered: 05/21/2024)
05/20/24	Lysse Partners LLC v. Cavern Club LLC 1:24-CV-00274 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER. Counsel are reminded that, per the Court's earlier Scheduling Order, they must submit their proposed case management plan and joint letter by the Thursday prior to the upcoming conference. The parties should indicate in their joint letter whether they can do without a conference altogether. If so, the Court may enter a case management plan and scheduling order and the parties need not appear. If not (or if the Court concludes that, the parties' views notwithstanding, a conference should be held), the Court will hold the initial conference by telephone, albeit perhaps at a different time. To that end, counsel should indicate in their joint letter dates and times during the week of the conference that they would be available for a telephone conference. Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, however, the conference will proceed - and will do so on the date and time previously set. In the event a conference is held, the parties should join it by calling the Court's dedicated conference line at (888) 363-4749 and using access code 542-1540, followed by the pound (#) key. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 5/20/24) (yv) (Entered: 05/20/2024) ORDER. Counsel are reminded that, per the Court's earlier Scheduling Order, they must submit their proposed case management plan and joint letter by the Thursday prior to the upcoming conference. The parties should indicate in their joint letter whether they can do without a conference altogether. If so, the Court may enter a case management plan and scheduling order and the parties need not appear. If not (or if the Court concludes that, the parties' views notwithstanding, a conference should be held), the Court will hold the initial conference by telephone, albeit perhaps at a different time. To that end, counsel should indicate in their joint letter dates and times during the week of the conference that they would be available for a telephone conference. Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, however, the conference will proceed - and will do so on the date and time previously set. In the event a conference is held, the parties should join it by calling the Court's dedicated conference line at (888) 363-4749 and using access code 542-1540, followed by the pound (#) key. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 5/20/24) (yv) (Entered: 05/20/2024)
04/26/24	Lysse Partners LLC v. Cavern Club LLC 1:24-CV-00274 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER granting [31] Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Application GRANTED. The initial pretrial conference currently scheduled for May 8, 2024 is hereby RESCHEDULED to May 29, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. The call-in instructions remain the same. See ECF No. 10. The Clerk is directed to terminate ECF No. 31. SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 5/29/2024 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesse M. Furman. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/26/2024) (mml) (Entered: 04/26/2024) ORDER granting [31] Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Application GRANTED. The initial pretrial conference currently scheduled for May 8, 2024 is hereby RESCHEDULED to May 29, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. The call-in instructions remain the same. See ECF No. 10. The Clerk is directed to terminate ECF No. 31. SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 5/29/2024 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesse M. Furman. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/26/2024) (mml) (Entered: 04/26/2024)
04/26/24	Lysse Partners LLC v. Cavern Club LLC 1:24-CV-00274 ( S.D. NY )	JOINT LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference (Initial Pretrial Conference) addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Louis S. Ederer dated April 26, 2024. Document filed by Lysse Partners LLC..(Ederer, Louis) (Entered: 04/26/2024)
04/16/24	Lysse Partners LLC v. Cavern Club LLC 1:24-CV-00274 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER denying as moot [21] Motion to Dismiss. In light of Defendant's Answer to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, see ECF Nos. 28, 29, Defendant's earlier motion to dismiss filed at ECF No. 21 is hereby DENIED as moot. The initial pretrial conference that the Court previously adjourned sine die, see ECF No. 25, is hereby RESCHEDULED to May 8, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. The parties should consult ECF No. 10 for the call-in information and instructions regarding the joint letter and proposed Civil Case Management Plan due prior to the conference. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket No. 21. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/16/2024) (ate) (Entered: 04/16/2024) ORDER denying as moot [21] Motion to Dismiss. In light of Defendant's Answer to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, see ECF Nos. 28, 29, Defendant's earlier motion to dismiss filed at ECF No. 21 is hereby DENIED as moot. The initial pretrial conference that the Court previously adjourned sine die, see ECF No. 25, is hereby RESCHEDULED to May 8, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. The parties should consult ECF No. 10 for the call-in information and instructions regarding the joint letter and proposed Civil Case Management Plan due prior to the conference. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket No. 21. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/16/2024) (ate) (Entered: 04/16/2024)
04/16/24	Lysse Partners LLC v. Cavern Club LLC 1:24-CV-00274 ( S.D. NY )	Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Conference set for 5/8/2024 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesse M. Furman. (ate) (Entered: 04/16/2024)