Matao Cao
General
Total Cases1
Active Cases--
Patents--
--
--
--
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 09/30/21 | Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Final Order. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (mla) | |
| 09/30/21 | Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Final Order. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (mla) (Entered: 09/30/2021) | |
| 09/30/21 | Civil Case Terminated per 110 Stipulation of Dismissal. The clerk will prepare the final Report to the Patent/Trademark or Copyright Office. (mla) (Entered: 09/30/2021) | |
| 09/01/21 | Civil Case Terminated per [110] Stipulation of Dismissal. The clerk will prepare the final Report to the Patent/Trademark or Copyright Office. (mla) | |
| 09/01/21 | Joint STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co Ltd, Shenzhen Uni-Sun Electronic Co Ltd, Unicorn Global Inc. (Wang, Timothy) | |
| 09/01/21 | Joint STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co Ltd, Shenzhen Uni-Sun Electronic Co Ltd, Unicorn Global Inc. (Wang, Timothy) (Entered: 09/01/2021) | |
| 07/27/21 | ORDER granting [77] Motion to Compel. Because there is a valid arbitration agreement between Amazon and Golabs that applies to the dispute, the Court grants the motion to compel arbitration and stays the litigation against Amazon pending arbitration. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 7/27/2021) (mla) | |
| 07/27/21 | ORDER granting 77 Motion to Compel. Because there is a valid arbitration agreement between Amazon and Golabs that applies to the dispute, the Court grants the motion to compel arbitration and stays the litigation against Amazon pending arbitration. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 7/27/2021) (mla) (Entered: 07/27/2021) | |
| 07/14/21 | ORDER: The Court finds that Plaintiffs have failed to state a claim against Matao Cao. As such, the Court grants Cao`s 50 motion to dismiss. Because Plaintiffs have not requested leave to amend, the Court dismisses Plaintiffs` claims against Cao with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 7/14/2021) (mla) (Entered: 07/14/2021) | |
| 07/14/21 | ORDER: The Court finds that Plaintiffs have failed to state a claim against Matao Cao. As such, the Court grants Cao's [50] motion to dismiss. Because Plaintiffs have not requested leave to amend, the Court dismisses Plaintiffs' claims against Cao with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 7/14/2021) (mla) |