Maygoziy

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases1

Patents--

Courts--

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
06/24/24	Tan Grow Inc v. Entities Individuals 1:23-CV-13878 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff has filed a revised proposed case schedule that the Court is prepared to accept, but the report does not indicate whether Plaintiff conferred with Defendant Maygoziy before filing the suggested modifications. Unless Defendant files an objection by June 27, 2024, the Court will enter the schedule as proposed. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 06/24/2024) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff has filed a revised proposed case schedule that the Court is prepared to accept, but the report does not indicate whether Plaintiff conferred with Defendant Maygoziy before filing the suggested modifications. Unless Defendant files an objection by June 27, 2024, the Court will enter the schedule as proposed. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 06/24/2024)
06/24/24	Tan Grow Inc v. Entities Individuals 1:23-CV-13878 ( N.D. IL )	STATUS Report by Tan Grow Inc (Lei, Ge) (Entered: 06/24/2024)
06/24/24	Tan Grow Inc v. Entities Individuals 1:23-CV-13878 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: Upon further confidential settlement communication with the parties, the magistrate judge has determined that a settlement conference would not be fruitful at this time. The referral is terminated. Judge Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes no longer referred to the case. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 06/24/2024)
06/14/24	Tan Grow Inc v. Entities Individuals 1:23-CV-13878 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: The Court appreciates plaintiff calling to the Court's attention its mediation statement, sent on 6/4/24 to the Court but apparently inadvertently deleted. The Court has reviewed as well as the defendants' 6/12/24 mediation statement. Unfortunately, neither of these statements was sent to opposing counsel, but only to the Court. Accordingly, the Court's 6/13/24 order (doc. # 65 ) is modified so that plaintiff is ordered to send its mediation statement to defendant forthwith, and defendant's response mediation statement (containing a counterproposal to the settlement proposal in the plaintiff's statement) must be sent to plaintiff (and the Court's settlement correspondence box) on or before the close of business on 6/21/24. All other dates in the 6/13/24 order are vacated. The parties kindly are reminded to read the Court's Standing Order for Settlement conferences, as recently modified, but still requiring mediation statements to be exchanged, not sent only to the Court. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 06/14/2024) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: The Court appreciates plaintiff calling to the Court's attention its mediation statement, sent on 6/4/24 to the Court but apparently inadvertently deleted. The Court has reviewed as well as the defendants' 6/12/24 mediation statement. Unfortunately, neither of these statements was sent to opposing counsel, but only to the Court. Accordingly, the Court's 6/13/24 order (doc. # 65 ) is modified so that plaintiff is ordered to send its mediation statement to defendant forthwith, and defendant's response mediation statement (containing a counterproposal to the settlement proposal in the plaintiff's statement) must be sent to plaintiff (and the Court's settlement correspondence box) on or before the close of business on 6/21/24. All other dates in the 6/13/24 order are vacated. The parties kindly are reminded to read the Court's Standing Order for Settlement conferences, as recently modified, but still requiring mediation statements to be exchanged, not sent only to the Court. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 06/14/2024)
06/13/24	Tan Grow Inc v. Entities Individuals 1:23-CV-13878 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: On this referral for settlement (doc. # 59 ), the mediator ordered that the parties submit confidential settlement statements on 6/7/24 (by plaintiff) and 6/14/24 (by defendant) (doc. # 62 ). The Court ordered these statements as a part of its process to determine the parties' degree of commitment to settlement and compromise before setting aside public time for a settlement conference. The Court also previously ordered the parties to review the Court's Standing Order for Settlement Conferences (doc. # 61 ), available on the Court's website, and specifically directing that the audience for mediation statements are the opposing parties, and not the mediator (who still receives the statements), and directing that the mediation statements must contain concrete monetary and non-monetary proposals to resolve the matter. Unfortunately, no mediation statement at all was received from plaintiff, as far as the mediator is aware. Then, on 6/12/24, the mediator received a mediation statement from the defense, directed only at the mediator, and not containing any concrete settlement proposal but rather a statement of what judicial relief defendant would like to receive in the case, although, in fairness, if there was no opening proposal, the defense had nothing to which it might have responded. Rather than terminate the referral, the Court will give the parties a second opportunity at mediation and to show that they are serious about mediation and settling the matter. First, the parties must actually take the time to read the Standing Order for Settlement Conferences. Second, their mediation statements must comply with that order. Third, to give the parties another opportunity, mediation statements are now due from plaintiff on 6/28/24 and from defendant on 7/12/24. The Court will enter an appropriate order upon review of these statements, if they are submitted. Alternatively, if the parties are not willing to comply with this order, they need not do so, and they may inform the Court by confidential status report due by 6/28/24 that they are not interested in a settlement conference after all, and the referral will be terminated. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 06/13/2024) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: On this referral for settlement (doc. # 59 ), the mediator ordered that the parties submit confidential settlement statements on 6/7/24 (by plaintiff) and 6/14/24 (by defendant) (doc. # 62 ). The Court ordered these statements as a part of its process to determine the parties' degree of commitment to settlement and compromise before setting aside public time for a settlement conference. The Court also previously ordered the parties to review the Court's Standing Order for Settlement Conferences (doc. # 61 ), available on the Court's website, and specifically directing that the audience for mediation statements are the opposing parties, and not the mediator (who still receives the statements), and directing that the mediation statements must contain concrete monetary and non-monetary proposals to resolve the matter. Unfortunately, no mediation statement at all was received from plaintiff, as far as the mediator is aware. Then, on 6/12/24, the mediator received a mediation statement from the defense, directed only at the mediator, and not containing any concrete settlement proposal but rather a statement of what judicial relief defendant would like to receive in the case, although, in fairness, if there was no opening proposal, the defense had nothing to which it might have responded. Rather than terminate the referral, the Court will give the parties a second opportunity at mediation and to show that they are serious about mediation and settling the matter. First, the parties must actually take the time to read the Standing Order for Settlement Conferences. Second, their mediation statements must comply with that order. Third, to give the parties another opportunity, mediation statements are now due from plaintiff on 6/28/24 and from defendant on 7/12/24. The Court will enter an appropriate order upon review of these statements, if they are submitted. Alternatively, if the parties are not willing to comply with this order, they need not do so, and they may inform the Court by confidential status report due by 6/28/24 that they are not interested in a settlement conference after all, and the referral will be terminated. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 06/13/2024)
06/03/24	Tan Grow Inc v. Entities Individuals 1:23-CV-13878 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: In light of the status report 63 the motion for injunction bond damages 54 is denied without prejudice. The parties appear to have resolved this aspect of their dispute and the Court, in its discretion, declines to award damages under the circumstances. The parties are encouraged to earnestly continue their settlement efforts, and their status report as to the close of fact discovery remains due by December 9, 2024. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 06/03/2024) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: In light of the status report 63 the motion for injunction bond damages 54 is denied without prejudice. The parties appear to have resolved this aspect of their dispute and the Court, in its discretion, declines to award damages under the circumstances. The parties are encouraged to earnestly continue their settlement efforts, and their status report as to the close of fact discovery remains due by December 9, 2024. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 06/03/2024)
05/31/24	Tan Grow Inc v. Entities Individuals 1:23-CV-13878 ( N.D. IL )	STATUS Report Joint by Tan Grow Inc Presented before District Judge (Lei, Ge) (Entered: 05/31/2024)
05/24/24	Tan Grow Inc v. Entities Individuals 1:23-CV-13878 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: Pre-settlement telephonic conference held. The parties discussed the state of their preparedness for a settlement conference. The mediator directed the parties to submit confidential mediation statements, with concrete terms and a monetary proposal to resolve the case, to the Court's Settlement Correspondence email box, at Settlement_Correspondence_Fuentes@ilnd.uscourts.gov, with plaintiff's due by 5 p.m. on 6/7/24 and defendant's due by 5 p.m. on 6/14/24. The Court will review those statements and decide then on next steps. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 05/24/2024) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: Pre-settlement telephonic conference held. The parties discussed the state of their preparedness for a settlement conference. The mediator directed the parties to submit confidential mediation statements, with concrete terms and a monetary proposal to resolve the case, to the Court's Settlement Correspondence email box, at Settlement_Correspondence_Fuentes@ilnd.uscourts.gov, with plaintiff's due by 5 p.m. on 6/7/24 and defendant's due by 5 p.m. on 6/14/24. The Court will review those statements and decide then on next steps. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 05/24/2024)
05/20/24	Tan Grow Inc v. Entities Individuals 1:23-CV-13878 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: This matter coming before the magistrate judge on referral for a settlement conference (doc. # 59 ), a pre-settlement telephonic conference with counsel is set for 1 p.m. on 5/24/24 to discuss format and scheduling of a settlement conference. Counsel should contact the magistrate judge jointly at the time of the pre-settlement conference on the number to be provided to them by the courtroom deputy. Counsel are further directed to review the Court's Standing Order for Settlement Conferences and Top Ten Ways to Defeat Settlement, both available on the Court's website. Further, the parties are invited, if they wish, to communicate their pronouns for counsel or clients to the courtroom deputy, Lauren Knight, at 312-818-6514. The judge's pronouns are he/him/his. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 05/20/2024) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: This matter coming before the magistrate judge on referral for a settlement conference (doc. # 59 ), a pre-settlement telephonic conference with counsel is set for 1 p.m. on 5/24/24 to discuss format and scheduling of a settlement conference. Counsel should contact the magistrate judge jointly at the time of the pre-settlement conference on the number to be provided to them by the courtroom deputy. Counsel are further directed to review the Court's Standing Order for Settlement Conferences and Top Ten Ways to Defeat Settlement, both available on the Court's website. Further, the parties are invited, if they wish, to communicate their pronouns for counsel or clients to the courtroom deputy, Lauren Knight, at 312-818-6514. The judge's pronouns are he/him/his. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 05/20/2024)
05/17/24	Tan Grow Inc v. Entities Individuals 1:23-CV-13878 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Executive Committee: Case referred to the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes for a Settlement Conference. Mailed notice. (Attachments: # 1 Request for Referral) (jj, ) (Entered: 05/17/2024)