Metrasens Inc

General

Total Cases2

Active Cases1

Patents17

CourtsN.D. Ohio

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

L2

B

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
02/03/25	Kopp Development Inc v. Metrasens Inc 1:21-CV-01216 ( N.D. OH )	Memorandum Opinion and Order: For all the reasons set forth in this Order, the Court finds that it cannot determine, as a matter of law, that the challenged statement in the Intertek Summary is literally false, or that Metrasens' conduct amounts to willful deception. These issues will need to be decided by the jury. It follows, then, that the Court cannot determine as a matter of law that KDI is entitled to the presumption of damages. The applicability of that presumption will depend upon the jury's findings as to literal falsity and willful deception. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 2/3/2025. (P,K) (Entered: 02/03/2025) Memorandum Opinion and Order: For all the reasons set forth in this Order, the Court finds that it cannot determine, as a matter of law, that the challenged statement in the Intertek Summary is literally false, or that Metrasens' conduct amounts to willful deception. These issues will need to be decided by the jury. It follows, then, that the Court cannot determine as a matter of law that KDI is entitled to the presumption of damages. The applicability of that presumption will depend upon the jury's findings as to literal falsity and willful deception. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 2/3/2025. (P,K) (Entered: 02/03/2025)
01/31/25	Kopp Development Inc v. Metrasens Inc 1:21-CV-01216 ( N.D. OH )	Motion in limine and Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine to Preclude Introduction of Evidence Relating to Plaintiff's Damages Claims That Are Not Associated with Lost Sales to UPMC filed by Defendant Metrasens, Inc.. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit 1 - 2022-02-18 KDI's Responses to Metrasens' 1st Set of ROGs, # [2] Exhibit 2 - 2022-12-13 KDI's Responses to Metrasens' 2nd Set of ROGs, # [3] Exhibit 3 - Chart Reflecting KDI - UPMC Sales, # [4] Exhibit 4 - Metrasens' Sales Data to UPMC Facilities, # [5] Exhibit 5 - 2024-12-20 Email from B. Terbrack to M. Smith)(Smith, Michael) (Entered: 01/31/2025) Motion in limine and Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine to Preclude Introduction of Evidence Relating to Plaintiff's Damages Claims That Are Not Associated with Lost Sales to UPMC filed by Defendant Metrasens, Inc.. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit 1 - 2022-02-18 KDI's Responses to Metrasens' 1st Set of ROGs, # [2] Exhibit 2 - 2022-12-13 KDI's Responses to Metrasens' 2nd Set of ROGs, # [3] Exhibit 3 - Chart Reflecting KDI - UPMC Sales, # [4] Exhibit 4 - Metrasens' Sales Data to UPMC Facilities, # [5] Exhibit 5 - 2024-12-20 Email from B. Terbrack to M. Smith)(Smith, Michael) (Entered: 01/31/2025)
01/30/25	Kopp Development Inc v. Metrasens Inc 1:21-CV-01216 ( N.D. OH )	Motion in limine and Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine Regarding Plaintiff's Newly Disclosed Damages Claims filed by Defendant Metrasens, Inc.. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit 1 - 2021-10-14 KDI's Initial Disclosures, # [2] Exhibit 2 - 2022-12-13 KDI's Supplemental Responses to Metrasens' 1st Set of ROGs, # [3] Exhibit 3 - 2022-12-13 KDI's Responses to Metrasens' 2nd Set of ROGs, # [4] Exhibit 4 - 2024-12-06 Email from M. Smith to B. Terbrack, # [5] Exhibit 5 - 2024-12-18 Email from B. Terbrack to M. Smith, # [6] Exhibit 6 - 2025-01-03 Email from M. Smith to B. Terbrack, # [7] Exhibit 7 - 2025-01-03 Email from B. Terbrack to M. Smith, # [8] Exhibit 8 - 2025-01-07 Email from B. Terbrack to M. Smith, # [9] Exhibit 9 - 2025-01-08 Email from B. Terbrack to M. Smith, # [10] Exhibit 10 - 2025-01-10 Email from B. Terbrack to M. Smith, # [11] Exhibit 11 - 2025-01-24 Email from B. Terbrack to M. Smith, # [12] Exhibit 12 - 2025-01-28 Email from B. Terbrack to M. Smith)(Smith, Michael) (Entered: 01/30/2025) Motion in limine and Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine Regarding Plaintiff's Newly Disclosed Damages Claims filed by Defendant Metrasens, Inc.. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit 1 - 2021-10-14 KDI's Initial Disclosures, # [2] Exhibit 2 - 2022-12-13 KDI's Supplemental Responses to Metrasens' 1st Set of ROGs, # [3] Exhibit 3 - 2022-12-13 KDI's Responses to Metrasens' 2nd Set of ROGs, # [4] Exhibit 4 - 2024-12-06 Email from M. Smith to B. Terbrack, # [5] Exhibit 5 - 2024-12-18 Email from B. Terbrack to M. Smith, # [6] Exhibit 6 - 2025-01-03 Email from M. Smith to B. Terbrack, # [7] Exhibit 7 - 2025-01-03 Email from B. Terbrack to M. Smith, # [8] Exhibit 8 - 2025-01-07 Email from B. Terbrack to M. Smith, # [9] Exhibit 9 - 2025-01-08 Email from B. Terbrack to M. Smith, # [10] Exhibit 10 - 2025-01-10 Email from B. Terbrack to M. Smith, # [11] Exhibit 11 - 2025-01-24 Email from B. Terbrack to M. Smith, # [12] Exhibit 12 - 2025-01-28 Email from B. Terbrack to M. Smith)(Smith, Michael) (Entered: 01/30/2025)
01/28/25	Kopp Development Inc v. Metrasens Inc 1:21-CV-01216 ( N.D. OH )	Order [non-document]granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney David E. Goddard for Metrasens, Inc. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc # [57] .) Judge Pamela A. Barker on 1/28/2025.(P,K) (Entered: 01/28/2025) Order [non-document]granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney David E. Goddard for Metrasens, Inc. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc # [57] .) Judge Pamela A. Barker on 1/28/2025.(P,K) (Entered: 01/28/2025)
01/24/25	Kopp Development Inc v. Metrasens Inc 1:21-CV-01216 ( N.D. OH )	Responsive Brief re: Presumption of Damages and Related Issues filed by Metrasens, Inc.. Related document(s) [54] . (Smith, Michael) (Entered: 01/24/2025)
01/24/25	Kopp Development Inc v. Metrasens Inc 1:21-CV-01216 ( N.D. OH )	Response Brief on Presumption of Damages filed by Kopp Development Inc.. Related document(s) [55] . (Terbrack, Robert) (Entered: 01/24/2025)
01/24/25	Kopp Development Inc v. Metrasens Inc 1:21-CV-01216 ( N.D. OH )	Motion for attorney David E. Goddard to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number BOHNDC-12926363, filed by Defendant Metrasens, Inc.. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit - Certificate of Good Standing)(Wagoner, Edmund) (Entered: 01/24/2025)
01/23/25	Kopp Development Inc v. Metrasens Inc 1:21-CV-01216 ( N.D. OH )	Attorney Appearance by Edmund L. Wagoner, III filed by on behalf of Metrasens, Inc.. (Wagoner, Edmund) (Entered: 01/23/2025)
01/10/25	Kopp Development Inc v. Metrasens Inc 1:21-CV-01216 ( N.D. OH )	Brief Regarding Presumption of Damages and Related Issues filed by Metrasens, Inc.. Related document(s) [53] . (Smith, Michael) (Entered: 01/10/2025)
01/10/25	Kopp Development Inc v. Metrasens Inc 1:21-CV-01216 ( N.D. OH )	Brief on Lanham Act Presumptions filed by Kopp Development Inc.. (Terbrack, Robert) (Entered: 01/10/2025)