MG Premium Ltd
General
Total Cases6
Active Cases5
Patents--
--
--
--
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
L1
B
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 07/02/24 | REPLY BRIEF re 106 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court filed by Plaintiffs DISH Technologies L.L.C., Sling TV L.L.C.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7)(Hatch, Brent) (Entered: 07/02/2024) | |
| 06/25/24 | RESPONSE re 106 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court, filed by MG Billing Ltd, MG Premium Ltd, Yellow Production s.r.o.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Dennis McMahon, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Christiansen, Erik) (Entered: 06/25/2024) | |
| 06/11/24 | DOCKET TEXT ORDER. Defendant shall file a response to 106 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision no later than June 25, 2024. Plaintiffs may file a reply in support of the objection no later than July 2, 2024. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. on 06/11/2024. No attached document. (tpk) (Entered: 06/11/2024) | |
| 06/07/24 | OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court by DISH Technologies L.L.C., Sling TV L.L.C. re 101 Order on Motion to Stay, Order on Motion to Expedite, Memorandum Decision (Hatch, Brent) (Entered: 06/07/2024) | |
| 05/30/24 | REPLY BRIEF re 104 Notice (Other), Objection to Plaintiffs' Notice of Withdrawal filed by Defendants MG Billing Ltd, MG Premium Ltd. (Christiansen, Erik) (Entered: 05/30/2024) | |
| 05/28/24 | NOTICE of Withdrawal of Motion for Preliminary Injunction as to Defendants Sonesta Technologies, S.R.O., Sonesta Media, S.R.O., and Yellow Production, S.R.O., and for Certain Patents by DISH Technologies L.L.C., Sling TV L.L.C. re 19 Plaintiff's MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum in Support (Hatch, Brent) (Entered: 05/28/2024) | |
| 05/28/24 | DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting 41 Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document. Defendants seek to seal portions of Exhibit 2 and the entirety of Exhibit 4 to their 40 Response to 19 Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Where the case is now stayed pending inter partes review, (see Doc. No. 101 ), the public interest in access is lessened and is outweighed by the confidentiality interests articulated in the motion to seal. Therefore, Exhibit 4 and the unredacted version of Exhibit 2 (filed under seal at Doc. No. 43) shall remain sealed until otherwise ordered. This ruling may be revisited if the exhibits are later used to determine the parties' substantive legal rights. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 5/28/2024. No attached document. (med) (Entered: 05/28/2024) | |
| 05/28/24 | DOCKET TEXT ORDER denying without prejudice 45 Plaintiffs' Motion for Expedited Discovery Re: Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Where the case is now stayed pending inter partes review, (see Doc. No. 101 ), this motion is denied without prejudice. The motion may be refiled, if appropriate, after the stay is lifted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 5/28/2024. No attached document. (med) (Entered: 05/28/2024) | |
| 05/24/24 | MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 79 Defendants' Expedited Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 5/24/24. (dle) (Entered: 05/24/2024) | |
| 05/24/24 | DOCKET TEXT ORDER denying 99 Motion for Leave to File Response. The response Defendants seek is not necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 5/24/2024. No attached document. (gdr) (Entered: 05/24/2024) |