Mindgeek USA Inc

General

Total Cases14

Active Cases4

Patents--

CourtsC.D. California E.D. Texas D. Delaware

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

L1

B

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
10/05/21	Relevant Holdings LLC v. Mindgeek USA Inc 2:21-CV-03174 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MINDGEEK USA INC. and MINDGEEK S.A.R.L.'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS) [57] . (lc)
10/04/21	Relevant Holdings LLC v. Mindgeek USA Inc 2:21-CV-03174 ( C.D. CA )	REPLY In Support Of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees [57] filed by Defendants MindGeek S.a.r.l., MindGeek USA Inc. . (Attachments: # [1] Declaration Sarah S. Brooks with Exhibit A)(Brooks, Sarah)
09/27/21	Relevant Holdings LLC v. Mindgeek USA Inc 2:21-CV-03174 ( C.D. CA )	OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees [57] filed by Plaintiff Relevant Holdings, LLC. (Lord, John)
09/16/21	Relevant Holdings LLC v. Mindgeek USA Inc 2:21-CV-03174 ( C.D. CA )	SEALED DOCUMENT (Exhibits B and E) re Declaration (Motion related) [59] , Order on Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal, [58] filed by Defendants MindGeek S.a.r.l., MindGeek USA Inc. . (Attachments: # [1] Unredacted Document)(Brooks, Sarah)
09/16/21	Relevant Holdings LLC v. Mindgeek USA Inc 2:21-CV-03174 ( C.D. CA )	DECLARATION of Sarah S. Brooks In Support Of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees [57] (Amended Per Order on Sept 15, 2021 [Dkt 58]) filed by Defendants MindGeek S.a.r.l., MindGeek USA Inc. . (Brooks, Sarah)
09/15/21	Relevant Holdings LLC v. Mindgeek USA Inc 2:21-CV-03174 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER RE: APPLICATION TO SEAL CERTAIN DOCUMENTS [55] : The Defendant MindGeek USA Inc's application is granted in part and denied in part. The Court authorizes only the pornographic images to be maintained under seal. The Court will not consider the documents sought to be sealed in connection with the motion for attorneys fees unless Defendant files them consistent with Local Rule 79-5.2.2(a) or submits a renewed application supported by good cause. (lc) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER RE: APPLICATION TO SEAL CERTAIN DOCUMENTS [55] : The Defendant MindGeek USA Inc's application is granted in part and denied in part. The Court authorizes only the pornographic images to be maintained under seal. The Court will not consider the documents sought to be sealed in connection with the motion for attorneys fees unless Defendant files them consistent with Local Rule 79-5.2.2(a) or submits a renewed application supported by good cause. (lc)
09/13/21	Relevant Holdings LLC v. Mindgeek USA Inc 2:21-CV-03174 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Defendants MindGeek S.a.r.l., MindGeek USA Inc. . Motion set for hearing on 10/18/21 at 09:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (Attachments: # [1] Declaration Sarah S. Brooks with Exhibits A-P, # [2] Proposed Order) (Brooks, Sarah)
09/13/21	Relevant Holdings LLC v. Mindgeek USA Inc 2:21-CV-03174 ( C.D. CA )	SEALED DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION to file document (Exhibits B-E and H-L) under seal [55] filed by Defendants MindGeek S.a.r.l., MindGeek USA Inc. . (Attachments: # [1] Unredacted Document Sealed Ex B to Brooks Declaration, # [2] Unredacted Document Sealed Ex C to Brooks Declaration, # [3] Unredacted Document Sealed Ex D to Brooks Declaration, # [4] Unredacted Document Sealed Ex E to Brooks Declaration, # [5] Unredacted Document Sealed Ex H to Brooks Declaration, # [6] Unredacted Document Sealed Ex I to Brooks Declaration, # [7] Unredacted Document Sealed Ex J to Brooks Declaration, # [8] Unredacted Document Sealed Ex K to Brooks Declaration, # [9] Unredacted Document Sealed Ex L to Brooks Declaration)(Brooks, Sarah) SEALED DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION to file document (Exhibits B-E and H-L) under seal [55] filed by Defendants MindGeek S.a.r.l., MindGeek USA Inc. . (Attachments: # [1] Unredacted Document Sealed Ex B to Brooks Declaration, # [2] Unredacted Document Sealed Ex C to Brooks Declaration, # [3] Unredacted Document Sealed Ex D to Brooks Declaration, # [4] Unredacted Document Sealed Ex E to Brooks Declaration, # [5] Unredacted Document Sealed Ex H to Brooks Declaration, # [6] Unredacted Document Sealed Ex I to Brooks Declaration, # [7] Unredacted Document Sealed Ex J to Brooks Declaration, # [8] Unredacted Document Sealed Ex K to Brooks Declaration, # [9] Unredacted Document Sealed Ex L to Brooks Declaration)(Brooks, Sarah)
09/13/21	Relevant Holdings LLC v. Mindgeek USA Inc 2:21-CV-03174 ( C.D. CA )	APPLICATION to file document (Exhibits B-E and H-L) under seal filed by Defendants MindGeek S.a.r.l., MindGeek USA Inc. . (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order, # [2] Redacted Document Ex B to Brooks Declaration, # [3] Redacted Document Ex C to Brooks Declaration, # [4] Redacted Document Ex D to Brooks Declaration, # [5] Redacted Document Ex E to Brooks Declaration, # [6] Redacted Document Ex H to Brooks Declaration, # [7] Redacted Document Ex I to Brooks Declaration, # [8] Redacted Document Ex J to Brooks Declaration, # [9] Redacted Document Ex K to Brooks Declaration, # [10] Redacted Document Ex L to Brooks Declaration)(Brooks, Sarah) APPLICATION to file document (Exhibits B-E and H-L) under seal filed by Defendants MindGeek S.a.r.l., MindGeek USA Inc. . (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order, # [2] Redacted Document Ex B to Brooks Declaration, # [3] Redacted Document Ex C to Brooks Declaration, # [4] Redacted Document Ex D to Brooks Declaration, # [5] Redacted Document Ex E to Brooks Declaration, # [6] Redacted Document Ex H to Brooks Declaration, # [7] Redacted Document Ex I to Brooks Declaration, # [8] Redacted Document Ex J to Brooks Declaration, # [9] Redacted Document Ex K to Brooks Declaration, # [10] Redacted Document Ex L to Brooks Declaration)(Brooks, Sarah)
09/13/21	Relevant Holdings LLC v. Mindgeek USA Inc 2:21-CV-03174 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES [53] by Judge Mark C. Scarsi (lc)