National Presto Industries Inc

General

Total Cases2
Active Cases--
Patents143
TypeOperating Company
Elite Ratings
--

Ratings

Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
04/12/23
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff National Presto Industries, Inc.. Dismissal is With Prejudice. (Finkelstein, Mark) (Entered: 04/12/2023)
04/05/23
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge John W. Holcomb. In the present case, it appears that Plaintiff served the summons and complaint on one or more Defendants more than 21 days ago ( 60 days if the Defendant is the United States), but such Defendant(s) did not file an answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before April 12, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed, with respect to each Defendant who has not filed an answer or otherwise responded to the complaint. (lom) (Entered: 04/05/2023)
03/07/23
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 30 by Judge John W. Holcomb. After full consideration of Plaintiff National Presto Industries, Inc. and Defendant Konwin, Inc. Joint Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Respond to Complaint, the Court finds good cause and hereby ORDERS as follows: The Parties' request to extend the deadline for Defendant to Respond to the Complaint is APPROVED. Defendant shall have up to and including April 3, 2023, to Respond to the Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) (Entered: 03/07/2023)
03/03/23
STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to April 3, 2023 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by Defendant Konwin, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Wang, Chao) (Entered: 03/03/2023)
02/09/23
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 28 by Judge John W. Holcomb. The Court Orders that Defendant shall have through and including March 3, 2023, to respond to the Complaint. The Court hereby discharges the OSC re dismissal (dkt. no. 27). (lom) (Entered: 02/09/2023)
02/08/23
STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to National Presto Industries, Inc. answer now due 3/3/2023, filed by Plaintiff National Presto Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Finkelstein, Mark) (Entered: 02/08/2023)
02/07/23
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge John W. Holcomb. In the present case, it appears that Plaintiff served the summons and complaint on one or more Defendants more than 21 days ago (60 days if the Defendant is the United States), but such Defendant(s) did not file an answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before February 14, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed, with respect to each Defendant who has not filed an answer or otherwise responded to the complaint. (lom) (Entered: 02/07/2023)
01/04/23
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Judge John W. Holcomb 25 . The Parties' request to extend the deadline for Defendant to Respond to the Complaint is APPROVED. Defendant shall have up to and including February 1, 2023, to Respond to the Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) (Entered: 01/04/2023)
01/03/23
Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to February 1, 2023 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by Defendant Konwin, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Wang, Chao) (Entered: 01/03/2023)
12/06/22
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Judge John W. Holcomb. The Parties' request to extend the deadline for Defendant to Respond to the Complaint is APPROVED. Defendant shall have up to and including January 2, 2023, to respond to the Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) (Entered: 12/06/2022)