Nelson Yen

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsC.D. California

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
08/17/21	Cathay Bank v. Nelson Yen 2:21-CV-03909 ( C.D. CA )	Receipt of Acknowledgment of documents by Superior Court of CA for the County of Los Angeles, case no. 21PSCV00276. (lom) (Entered: 08/17/2021)
07/28/21	Cathay Bank v. Nelson Yen 2:21-CV-03909 ( C.D. CA )	TRANSMITTAL of documents to Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court, East District. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court, East District. (gk) (Entered: 07/28/2021)
07/28/21	Cathay Bank v. Nelson Yen 2:21-CV-03909 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Minutes of 7/27/2021) (gk) (Entered: 07/28/2021)
07/28/21	Cathay Bank v. Nelson Yen 2:21-CV-03909 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REMANDING CASE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Defendant was ordered to show cause why this matter should not be remanded to state court 46 . The Court is not persuaded that there is subject matter jurisdiction.Defendant has offered no persuasive authority or explanation showing that this case implicates the Courts jurisdiction over patent cases. Rather, the claims that served as the bases for removal arise under state statutes and turn solely on questions of state law. For these reasons, the Court appears to lack subject matter jurisdiction and so the case is REMANDED to Los Angeles Superior Court, Case Number 21PSCV00276. See document for further details. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6 ) Court Reporter: N/A. (gk) (Entered: 07/28/2021) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REMANDING CASE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Defendant was ordered to show cause why this matter should not be remanded to state court 46 . The Court is not persuaded that there is subject matter jurisdiction.Defendant has offered no persuasive authority or explanation showing that this case implicates the Courts jurisdiction over patent cases. Rather, the claims that served as the bases for removal arise under state statutes and turn solely on questions of state law. For these reasons, the Court appears to lack subject matter jurisdiction and so the case is REMANDED to Los Angeles Superior Court, Case Number 21PSCV00276. See document for further details. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6 ) Court Reporter: N/A. (gk) (Entered: 07/28/2021)
07/26/21	Cathay Bank v. Nelson Yen 2:21-CV-03909 ( C.D. CA )	SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The Court VACATES the hearing in re the MOTION to Dismiss the First, Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth Claims for Relief in the First Amended Counterclaim filed by Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Cathay Bank. Dkt. No. 31, set for hearing on 7/30/2021. If the Court determines that a hearing is necessary, one will be reset at a later date. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vcr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 07/26/2021) SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The Court VACATES the hearing in re the MOTION to Dismiss the First, Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth Claims for Relief in the First Amended Counterclaim filed by Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Cathay Bank. Dkt. No. 31, set for hearing on 7/30/2021. If the Court determines that a hearing is necessary, one will be reset at a later date. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vcr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 07/26/2021)
07/16/21	Cathay Bank v. Nelson Yen 2:21-CV-03909 ( C.D. CA )	RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Cathay Bankto Response, 49 RESPONSE filed by Gryphon Mobile Electronics, LLC (August, Marshall) (Entered: 07/16/2021)
07/09/21	Cathay Bank v. Nelson Yen 2:21-CV-03909 ( C.D. CA )	RESPONSE filed by Counter Claimant Gryphon Mobile Electronics, LLC, Defendant Gryphon Mobile Electronics, LLCto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Motion Hearing and R&R Deadlines,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings,, 46 (Stone, Elliott) (Entered: 07/09/2021)
06/29/21	Cathay Bank v. Nelson Yen 2:21-CV-03909 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE PLAINTIFF AND COUNTER-DEFENDANTS APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ATTACHMENT (Dkt. 14 ) by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: The hearing is hereby vacated because Yen has filed for bankruptcy, triggering an automatic stay of the proceedings as to Defendant Nelson Yen. (Dkt. 22.) Vacating the hearing date also is appropriate in view of the Order to Show Cause re Remand issued by the District Court on June 28, 2021. (Dkt. 46.) [See document for details.] (es) (Entered: 06/29/2021) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE PLAINTIFF AND COUNTER-DEFENDANTS APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ATTACHMENT (Dkt. 14 ) by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: The hearing is hereby vacated because Yen has filed for bankruptcy, triggering an automatic stay of the proceedings as to Defendant Nelson Yen. (Dkt. 22.) Vacating the hearing date also is appropriate in view of the Order to Show Cause re Remand issued by the District Court on June 28, 2021. (Dkt. 46.) [See document for details.] (es) (Entered: 06/29/2021)
06/29/21	Cathay Bank v. Nelson Yen 2:21-CV-03909 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTE ORDER [In Chambers] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: REMAND by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. For these reasons, Defendant is ORDERED to show cause at a hearing on July 30, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. why this matter should not be remanded to state court. Defendant should submit a filing, no longer than 7 pages, by July 9, 2021 addressing this issue. Plaintiff may file a response, no longer than 7 pages, by July 16, 2021. Alternatively, the parties may file a stipulation to remand if they do not have reasonable legal grounds to assert jurisdiction, and the OSC hearing will be taken off calendar. Given the need to resolve the Courts subject matter jurisdiction before reaching the merits of the parties claims, the Court also CONTINUES the hearings for the pending motions to dismiss and the mandatory scheduling conference to July 30, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. (lom) (Entered: 06/29/2021) MINUTE ORDER [In Chambers] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: REMAND by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. For these reasons, Defendant is ORDERED to show cause at a hearing on July 30, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. why this matter should not be remanded to state court. Defendant should submit a filing, no longer than 7 pages, by July 9, 2021 addressing this issue. Plaintiff may file a response, no longer than 7 pages, by July 16, 2021. Alternatively, the parties may file a stipulation to remand if they do not have reasonable legal grounds to assert jurisdiction, and the OSC hearing will be taken off calendar. Given the need to resolve the Courts subject matter jurisdiction before reaching the merits of the parties claims, the Court also CONTINUES the hearings for the pending motions to dismiss and the mandatory scheduling conference to July 30, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. (lom) (Entered: 06/29/2021)
06/25/21	Cathay Bank v. Nelson Yen 2:21-CV-03909 ( C.D. CA )	REPLY In Support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaints Third, Fourth and Fifth Claims 11 filed by Counter Claimant Gryphon Mobile Electronics, LLC, Defendant Gryphon Mobile Electronics, LLC. (Stone, Elliott) (Entered: 06/25/2021)