Ningbo Hitorhike Outdoor Co., Ltd.

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsS.D. New York

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
08/22/22	IP Power Holdings Ltd v. Ningbo Hitorhike Outdoor Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06640 ( S.D. NY )	AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 8/22/22 in a court action filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (yv) (Entered: 08/22/2022) AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 8/22/22 in a court action filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (yv) (Entered: 08/22/2022)
08/22/22	IP Power Holdings Ltd v. Ningbo Hitorhike Outdoor Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06640 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER OF DISMISSAL... The Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 8/22/22) (yv) (Entered: 08/22/2022)
08/11/22	IP Power Holdings Ltd v. Ningbo Hitorhike Outdoor Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06640 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. It is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff communicate with the Court, in writing, as to why Plaintiff has failed thus far to serve the summons and Complaint, or, if Plaintiff believes that the Defendant has been served, when and in what manner such service was made. If additional time to effectuate service under the Hague Convention is necessary, Plaintiff may request a nunc pro tunc extension of its service deadline. If the Court does not receive any communication from Plaintiff by August 18, 2022, showing good cause why such service was not made by the August 9, 2022 deadline, the Court will dismiss the case without further notice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 8/11/22) (yv) (Entered: 08/11/2022) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. It is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff communicate with the Court, in writing, as to why Plaintiff has failed thus far to serve the summons and Complaint, or, if Plaintiff believes that the Defendant has been served, when and in what manner such service was made. If additional time to effectuate service under the Hague Convention is necessary, Plaintiff may request a nunc pro tunc extension of its service deadline. If the Court does not receive any communication from Plaintiff by August 18, 2022, showing good cause why such service was not made by the August 9, 2022 deadline, the Court will dismiss the case without further notice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 8/11/22) (yv) (Entered: 08/11/2022)
11/09/21	IP Power Holdings Ltd v. Ningbo Hitorhike Outdoor Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06640 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER granting 9 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Application GRANTED. The deadline to serve Defendant Hitorhike is hereby extended to August 9, 2022. The initial pretrial conference currently scheduled for January 12, 2022, is hereby ADJOURNED to October 5, 2022, at 3:00 p.m. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 9. SO ORDERED. Service due by 8/9/2022. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 11/9/2021) (vfr) (Entered: 11/09/2021) ORDER granting 9 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Application GRANTED. The deadline to serve Defendant Hitorhike is hereby extended to August 9, 2022. The initial pretrial conference currently scheduled for January 12, 2022, is hereby ADJOURNED to October 5, 2022, at 3:00 p.m. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 9. SO ORDERED. Service due by 8/9/2022. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 11/9/2021) (vfr) (Entered: 11/09/2021)
11/09/21	IP Power Holdings Ltd v. Ningbo Hitorhike Outdoor Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06640 ( S.D. NY )	Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Conference set for 10/5/2022 at 03:00 PM before Judge Jesse M. Furman. (vfr) (Entered: 11/09/2021)
11/08/21	IP Power Holdings Ltd v. Ningbo Hitorhike Outdoor Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06640 ( S.D. NY )	FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to serve summons and complaint addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Lucian C. Chen dated November 8, 2021. Document filed by IP Power Holdings Limited..(Chen, Lucian) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
11/08/21	IP Power Holdings Ltd v. Ningbo Hitorhike Outdoor Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06640 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff communicate with the Court, in writing, as to why Plaintiff has failed to serve the summons and Complaint within the 90 days prescribed by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or, if Plaintiff believes that the Defendants have been served, when and in what manner such service was made. If the Court does not receive any communication from Plaintiff by November 22, 2021, showing good cause why such service was not made within the 90 days, the Court will dismiss the case without further notice. Additionally, the initial pretrial conference currently scheduled for November 10, 2021, is ADJOURNED to January 12, 2022, at 3:00 p.m. Finally, Plaintiff is directed (1) to notify Defendant's attorneys in this action by serving upon each of them a copy of this Order and (2) to file proof of such notice with the Court by November 15, 2021. If unaware of the identity of counsel for Defendant, counsel receiving this order must forthwith send a copy of this Order to that party personally. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 11/8/2021) (js) (Entered: 11/08/2021) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff communicate with the Court, in writing, as to why Plaintiff has failed to serve the summons and Complaint within the 90 days prescribed by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or, if Plaintiff believes that the Defendants have been served, when and in what manner such service was made. If the Court does not receive any communication from Plaintiff by November 22, 2021, showing good cause why such service was not made within the 90 days, the Court will dismiss the case without further notice. Additionally, the initial pretrial conference currently scheduled for November 10, 2021, is ADJOURNED to January 12, 2022, at 3:00 p.m. Finally, Plaintiff is directed (1) to notify Defendant's attorneys in this action by serving upon each of them a copy of this Order and (2) to file proof of such notice with the Court by November 15, 2021. If unaware of the identity of counsel for Defendant, counsel receiving this order must forthwith send a copy of this Order to that party personally. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 11/8/2021) (js) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
11/08/21	IP Power Holdings Ltd v. Ningbo Hitorhike Outdoor Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06640 ( S.D. NY )	Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Conference set for 1/12/2022 at 03:00 PM before Judge Jesse M. Furman. (js) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
11/01/21	IP Power Holdings Ltd v. Ningbo Hitorhike Outdoor Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06640 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER: In light of the COVID-19 situation, the Court will not hold the upcoming conference in this case in person. Counsel should submit their proposed case management plan and joint letter by the Thursday prior to the conference, as directed in the Court's earlier Scheduling Order. In their joint letter, the parties should also indicate whether they can do without a conference altogether. If so, the Court may enter a case management plan and scheduling order and the parties need not appear. If not, the Court will hold the initial conference by telephone, albeit perhaps at a different time. To that end, counsel should indicate in their joint letter dates and times during the week of the conference that they would be available for a telephone conference. In either case, counsel should review and comply with the procedures for telephone conferences set forth in the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jesse-m-furman. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 11/1/2021) (ate) (Entered: 11/01/2021) ORDER: In light of the COVID-19 situation, the Court will not hold the upcoming conference in this case in person. Counsel should submit their proposed case management plan and joint letter by the Thursday prior to the conference, as directed in the Court's earlier Scheduling Order. In their joint letter, the parties should also indicate whether they can do without a conference altogether. If so, the Court may enter a case management plan and scheduling order and the parties need not appear. If not, the Court will hold the initial conference by telephone, albeit perhaps at a different time. To that end, counsel should indicate in their joint letter dates and times during the week of the conference that they would be available for a telephone conference. In either case, counsel should review and comply with the procedures for telephone conferences set forth in the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jesse-m-furman. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 11/1/2021) (ate) (Entered: 11/01/2021)
09/03/21	IP Power Holdings Ltd v. Ningbo Hitorhike Outdoor Co Ltd 1:21-CV-06640 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER terminating 16 Letter Motion for Conference re: 16 LETTER MOTION for Conference addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Joseph M. Drayton dated August 26, 2021. The Court has reviewed the parties' submissions regarding Defendant's anticipated motion to dismiss and transfer. (Dkt. #16, 20). After reviewing these pre-motion letters, the Court wishes to convene a conference prior to setting a briefing schedule for Defendant's anticipated motion. Accordingly, the initial pretrial conference currently scheduled for October 1, 2021, at 3:30 p.m. (see Dkt. #14), shall be converted into a pre-motion conference to discuss Defendant's desired motion. The conference will be held telephonically, with the following dial-in information: At 3:30 p.m., the parties are to call (888) 363-4749 and enter access code 5123533. Please note, the conference line will not be available prior to 3:30 p.m. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 16. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 9/3/2021) (ate) (Entered: 09/03/2021) ORDER terminating 16 Letter Motion for Conference re: 16 LETTER MOTION for Conference addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Joseph M. Drayton dated August 26, 2021. The Court has reviewed the parties' submissions regarding Defendant's anticipated motion to dismiss and transfer. (Dkt. #16, 20). After reviewing these pre-motion letters, the Court wishes to convene a conference prior to setting a briefing schedule for Defendant's anticipated motion. Accordingly, the initial pretrial conference currently scheduled for October 1, 2021, at 3:30 p.m. (see Dkt. #14), shall be converted into a pre-motion conference to discuss Defendant's desired motion. The conference will be held telephonically, with the following dial-in information: At 3:30 p.m., the parties are to call (888) 363-4749 and enter access code 5123533. Please note, the conference line will not be available prior to 3:30 p.m. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 16. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 9/3/2021) (ate) (Entered: 09/03/2021)