NLB Corp
General
Total Cases11
Active Cases1
Patents25
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
L1
B
PTAB
L1
C
CAFC
--
--
--
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 07/10/23 | ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 37 Motion to Stay ( 37 Motion to Stay filed by NLB Corp terminated.) The stay in this case is extended an additional 14 days for settlement. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 7/10/2023) (chmb) (Entered: 07/10/2023) | |
| 07/07/23 | Joint MOTION to Stay Pending Settlement filed by NLB Corp with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Olds, Theodore) (Entered: 07/07/2023) | |
| 06/14/23 | DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of the plaintiff, Motion Pro, Inc. and against the defendant, Vevor, Inc. by Clerk on 6/14/23. (jdyne) (Entered: 06/14/2023) | |
| 06/14/23 | ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 29 Motion for Default Judgment; 30 Motion for Costs; 31 Motion for Attorney Fees. Entered by Senior Judge Christine M. Arguello on 06/14/2022.(msmot) (Entered: 06/14/2023) | |
| 06/09/23 | BRIEF in Support of 31 Renewed MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Plaintiff Motion Pro, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Kevin M. Pasquinelli)(Pasquinelli, Kevin) (Entered: 06/09/2023) | |
| 05/26/23 | ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 35 Motion to Stay. This case is stayed for thirty days for possible settlement. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 5/26/2023) (chmb) (Entered: 05/26/2023) | |
| 05/26/23 | ORDER: Plaintiff Motion Pro, Inc. shall file supplemental evidence related to requested attorney fees. The Court notes that the Affidavit filed with 31 Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Attorney Fees does not provide sufficient information for the Court to evaluate the reasonableness of counsel's rates. See Ramos v. Lamm, 713 F.2d 546, 555-56 (10th Cir. 1983), overruled on other grounds by Pennsylvania v. Del. Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711, 725 (1987). For example, there is no evidence related to lead counsel's level of experience or any information regarding the identities, positions, and levels of experience of the other three individuals who appear in the provided accounting. Shaw v. AAA Engineering & Drafting, Inc., 213 F.3d 538, 542 (10th Cir. 2000) (citing Ramos, 713 F.2d at 55354). Supplemental evidence regarding these and any other facts necessary to determine the reasonableness of Plaintiff's requested attorney fees is due on or before 6/9/2023. SO ORDERED by Senior Judge Christine M. Arguello on 5/26/2023. Text Only Entry (cmasec) (Entered: 05/26/2023) | |
| 05/23/23 | Joint MOTION to Stay for Thirty Day Stay Pending Settlement filed by NLB Corp (Olds, Theodore) (Entered: 05/23/2023) | |
| 05/09/23 | Renewed MOTION for Attorney Fees by Plaintiff Motion Pro, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Kevin M. Pasquinelli, # 2 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Pasquinelli, Kevin) (Entered: 05/09/2023) | |
| 05/09/23 | Renewed MOTION for Costs by Plaintiff Motion Pro, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Kevin M. Pasquinelli, # 2 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Pasquinelli, Kevin) (Entered: 05/09/2023) |