Nuvasive Inc
General
Total Cases53
Active Cases3
Patents743
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
L3
D
PTAB
L5
E
CAFC
L3
D
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 11/13/24 | RESPONSE to [389] MOTION to Stay to Stay Enforcement of the Judgment and Memorandum in Support, filed by NuVasive, Inc.. (Silver, Daniel) Modified on 11/13/2024 (nms). (Entered: 11/13/2024) | |
| 11/07/24 | SO ORDERED Granting [390] STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Amending Post-Trial Schedule. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 11/7/2024. (nms) (Entered: 11/07/2024) | |
| 11/07/24 | STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Amending Post-Trial Schedule - filed by Roger P. Jackson, M.D.. (Kraftschik, Stephen) Modified on 11/7/2024 (nms). (Entered: 11/07/2024) | |
| 10/31/24 | Set Answering Brief Deadline re [389] MOTION to Stay to Stay Enforcement of the Judgment and Memorandum in Support. Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 11/13/2024. (nms) (Entered: 10/31/2024) | |
| 10/30/24 | MOTION to Stay Enforcement of the Judgment and Memorandum in Support - filed by Roger P. Jackson, M.D.. (Kraftschik, Stephen) Modified on 10/30/2024 (nms). (Entered: 10/30/2024) | |
| 10/16/24 | OPENING BRIEF in Support re [383] MOTION to Alter or Amend the Judgment and/or for a New Trial Under Rule 59 filed by NuVasive, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 10/30/2024. (Joyce, Alexandra) (Entered: 10/16/2024) | |
| 10/16/24 | OPENING BRIEF in Support re [382] RENEWED Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law filed by Roger P. Jackson, M.D..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 10/30/2024. (Kraftschik, Stephen) (Entered: 10/16/2024) | |
| 10/03/24 | Remark: Case Reopened as it was closed in error. (nms) (Entered: 10/03/2024) | |
| 10/02/24 | ORAL ORDER: The motion to preclude (D.I. [347] ) was denied during trial (D.I. [376] at 606-07) and, to the extent it was not ruled upon, is now dismissed as moot. The motion for judgment as a matter of law (D.I. [361] ) was taken under advisement (D.I. [377] at 1012) and is now denied. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/2/2024. (nms) (Entered: 10/02/2024) | |
| 10/01/24 | FINAL JUDGMENT: NuVasive is not liable for Dr. Jacksons claim of fraudulent inducement. Dr. Jackson breached the covenant not to sue in the parties Amended and Restated Development and License Agreement (the 2014 Agreement) by bringing claims against licensed BOT Implant products sold by NuVasive. Pursuant to the parties stipulation (D.I. [355] ), damages are awarded to NuVasive in the amount of $337,500. Dr. Jackson is not liable for NuVasives counterclaims for (i) breaching the 2014Agreement by asserting patents that meet the definition of Helical Flange, (ii) breaching the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, or (iii) unjust enrichment (CASE CLOSED). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/1/2024. (nms) (Entered: 10/01/2024) |